Suppr超能文献

美托洛尔与沙库巴曲缬沙坦在中国心力衰竭患者中的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparison of Metoprolol and Sacubitril/Valsartan in Chinese Patients With Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Huang Yali, Lan Qianni, Liu Yuan

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Baoji Maternal and Child Health Hospital, China.

出版信息

Dose Response. 2025 May 21;23(2):15593258251344992. doi: 10.1177/15593258251344992. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacubitril/valsartan is recommended for patients with New York Heart Association class II to III heart failure (class 1 recommendation). The objectives of the study were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of metoprolol against sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS

In retrospective study, patients aged ≥18 years with heart failure and less than 40% of left ventricular ejection fraction received 25 mg metoprolol once daily (ML cohort, n = 117) or 50 mg sacubitril/valsartan twice daily (SV cohort, n = 128) for 6-months.

RESULTS

Systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rates, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide values, and left ventricular ejection fraction values improved across both cohorts, especially in the ML cohort after treatments for 6-months as compared to before treatments ( < .05 for all). Death was higher in the SV cohort than in the ML cohort over 15 months (10 (8%) vs. 2 (2%), = .0362). Fatigue, depression, shortness of breath, and wheezing have been reported in patients in the ML cohort. Dizziness, hyperkalemia, fatigue, abdominal or stomach pain, and blurred vision have been reported in patients in the SV cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Metoprolol may offer superior safety with comparable efficacy.

摘要

背景

沙库巴曲缬沙坦被推荐用于纽约心脏病协会II至III级心力衰竭患者(I类推荐)。本研究的目的是评估美托洛尔与沙库巴曲缬沙坦相比,在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中的有效性和安全性。

方法

在一项回顾性研究中,年龄≥18岁、患有心力衰竭且左心室射血分数低于40%的患者,每天接受一次25mg美托洛尔治疗(ML队列,n = 117)或每天两次50mg沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗(SV队列,n = 128),为期6个月。

结果

两个队列的收缩压和舒张压、心率、N末端脑钠肽前体值以及左心室射血分数值均有所改善,尤其是ML队列在治疗6个月后与治疗前相比(所有指标P <.05)。在15个月期间,SV队列的死亡率高于ML队列(10例(8%)对2例(2%),P = 0.0362)。ML队列的患者报告有疲劳、抑郁、呼吸急促和喘息。SV队列的患者报告有头晕、高钾血症、疲劳、腹痛或胃痛以及视力模糊。

结论

美托洛尔可能在安全性方面更具优势,且疗效相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/468e/12099163/9a17ab6b2cd3/10.1177_15593258251344992-img01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验