• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生成式人工智能在医疗保健专业领域的角色蔓延:对公开可用的定制健康相关生成式预训练变换器模型的横断面评估

Generative AI's healthcare professional role creep: a cross-sectional evaluation of publicly accessible, customised health-related GPTs.

作者信息

Chu Bianca, Modi Natansh D, Menz Bradley D, Bacchi Stephen, Kichenadasse Ganessan, Paterson Catherine, Kovoor Joshua G, Ramsey Imogen, Logan Jessica M, Wiese Michael D, McKinnon Ross A, Rowland Andrew, Sorich Michael J, Hopkins Ashley M

机构信息

Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Department of Neurology and the Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 May 9;13:1584348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1584348. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1584348
PMID:40416675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12098394/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is advancing rapidly; an important consideration is the public's increasing ability to customise foundational AI models to create publicly accessible applications tailored for specific tasks. This study aims to evaluate the accessibility and functionality descriptions of customised GPTs on the OpenAI GPT store that provide health-related information or assistance to patients and healthcare professionals.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional observational study of the OpenAI GPT store from September 2 to 6, 2024, to identify publicly accessible customised GPTs with health-related functions. We searched across general medicine, psychology, oncology, cardiology, and immunology applications. Identified GPTs were assessed for their name, description, intended audience, and usage. Regulatory status was checked across the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Union Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR), and Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) databases.

RESULTS

A total of 1,055 customised, health-related GPTs targeting patients and healthcare professionals were identified, which had collectively been used in over 360,000 conversations. Of these, 587 were psychology-related, 247 were in general medicine, 105 in oncology, 52 in cardiology, 30 in immunology, and 34 in other health specialties. Notably, 624 of the identified GPTs included healthcare professional titles (e.g., doctor, nurse, psychiatrist, oncologist) in their names and/or descriptions, suggesting they were taking on such roles. None of the customised GPTs identified were FDA, EU MDR, or TGA-approved.

DISCUSSION

This study highlights the rapid emergence of publicly accessible, customised, health-related GPTs. The findings raise important questions about whether current AI medical device regulations are keeping pace with rapid technological advancements. The results also highlight the potential "role creep" in AI chatbots, where publicly accessible applications begin to perform - or claim to perform - functions traditionally reserved for licensed professionals, underscoring potential safety concerns.

摘要

引言

生成式人工智能(AI)正在迅速发展;一个重要的考虑因素是公众越来越有能力定制基础AI模型,以创建针对特定任务的公开可用应用程序。本研究旨在评估OpenAI GPT商店中为患者和医疗保健专业人员提供健康相关信息或帮助的定制GPT的可访问性和功能描述。

方法

我们于2024年9月2日至6日对OpenAI GPT商店进行了一项横断面观察研究,以识别具有健康相关功能的公开可用定制GPT。我们在普通医学、心理学、肿瘤学、心脏病学和免疫学应用中进行了搜索。对识别出的GPT进行了名称、描述、目标受众和用途的评估。在美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)、欧盟医疗器械法规(EU MDR)和澳大利亚治疗用品管理局(TGA)数据库中检查了监管状态。

结果

共识别出1055个针对患者和医疗保健专业人员的定制健康相关GPT,它们总共被用于超过360,000次对话。其中,587个与心理学相关,247个属于普通医学,105个在肿瘤学领域,52个在心脏病学领域,30个在免疫学领域,34个在其他健康专业领域。值得注意的是,在识别出的GPT中,有624个在其名称和/或描述中包含医疗保健专业头衔(如医生、护士、精神科医生、肿瘤学家),这表明它们在扮演此类角色。所识别的定制GPT均未获得FDA、EU MDR或TGA的批准。

讨论

本研究突出了公开可用的、定制的、健康相关GPT的迅速出现。这些发现引发了关于当前AI医疗器械法规是否跟上快速技术进步步伐的重要问题。结果还突出了AI聊天机器人中潜在的“角色 creep”,即公开可用的应用程序开始执行——或声称执行——传统上由持牌专业人员保留的功能,这凸显了潜在的安全问题。

相似文献

1
Generative AI's healthcare professional role creep: a cross-sectional evaluation of publicly accessible, customised health-related GPTs.生成式人工智能在医疗保健专业领域的角色蔓延:对公开可用的定制健康相关生成式预训练变换器模型的横断面评估
Front Public Health. 2025 May 9;13:1584348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1584348. eCollection 2025.
2
Rapid molecular tests for tuberculosis and tuberculosis drug resistance: a qualitative evidence synthesis of recipient and provider views.快速分子检测结核分枝杆菌和结核分枝杆菌耐药性:受检者和提供者观点的定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD014877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014877.pub2.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Impact of AI-Assisted Diagnosis on American Patients' Trust in and Intention to Seek Help From Health Care Professionals: Randomized, Web-Based Survey Experiment.人工智能辅助诊断对美国患者对医疗保健专业人员的信任及寻求帮助意愿的影响:基于网络的随机调查实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 18;27:e66083. doi: 10.2196/66083.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
7
Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis.多利益相关方对人工智能在医疗保健中的应用的偏好:系统评价和主题分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116357. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
8
Safety and User Experience of a Generative Artificial Intelligence Digital Mental Health Intervention: Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.生成式人工智能数字心理健康干预的安全性与用户体验:探索性随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 23;27:e67365. doi: 10.2196/67365.
9
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing Effective Frameworks for Large Language Model-Based Medical Chatbots: Insights From Radiotherapy Education With ChatGPT.为基于大语言模型的医学聊天机器人开发有效框架:放疗教育中使用ChatGPT的见解
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Feb 18;11:e66633. doi: 10.2196/66633.
2
Generative AI chatbots for reliable cancer information: Evaluating web-search, multilingual, and reference capabilities of emerging large language models.用于提供可靠癌症信息的生成式人工智能聊天机器人:评估新兴大语言模型的网络搜索、多语言和参考能力。
Eur J Cancer. 2025 Mar 11;218:115274. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115274. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
3
FDA Perspective on the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care and Biomedicine.美国食品药品监督管理局对医疗保健和生物医学领域人工智能监管的看法。
JAMA. 2025 Jan 21;333(3):241-247. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.21451.
4
Testing and Evaluation of Health Care Applications of Large Language Models: A Systematic Review.大语言模型在医疗保健应用中的测试与评估:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2025 Jan 28;333(4):319-328. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.21700.
5
A scoping review of reporting gaps in FDA-approved AI medical devices.对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的人工智能医疗设备报告漏洞的范围审查。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Oct 3;7(1):273. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01270-x.
6
A framework for human evaluation of large language models in healthcare derived from literature review.一个源自文献综述的用于医疗保健领域大语言模型人工评估的框架。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Sep 28;7(1):258. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01258-7.
7
Ethical Considerations in Human-Centered AI: Advancing Oncology Chatbots Through Large Language Models.以人类为中心的人工智能中的伦理考量:通过大语言模型推进肿瘤学聊天机器人
JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2024 Nov 6;5:e64406. doi: 10.2196/64406.
8
Gender Representation of Health Care Professionals in Large Language Model-Generated Stories.大型语言模型生成故事中的医疗保健专业人员的性别代表性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2434997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34997.
9
Generative artificial intelligence in primary care: an online survey of UK general practitioners.初级保健中的生成式人工智能:英国全科医生的在线调查。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Sep 17;31(1):e101102. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101102.
10
A future role for health applications of large language models depends on regulators enforcing safety standards.大语言模型在健康应用方面的未来作用取决于监管机构执行安全标准。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Sep;6(9):e662-e672. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00124-9.