Damuzzo Vera, Gasperoni Lorenzo, Del Bono Luna, Ossato Andrea, Inno Alessandro, Messori Andrea
Hospital Pharmacy, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, AULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Vittorio Veneto, Italy.
Italian Society of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (SIFaCT), Turin, Italy.
Front Oncol. 2025 May 9;15:1566816. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1566816. eCollection 2025.
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors (ALKi) are the standard treatment for metastatic, ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Second- and third-generation ALKi, including alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib, envonalkib, and lorlatinib, have shown better efficacy than crizotinib. However, due to the lack of direct head-to-head comparisons among these agents, the optimal treatment for metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC remains unclear.
This study used the IPDfromKM (Individual Patient Data from Kaplan-Meier) method to reconstruct patient-level data from Kaplan-Meier curves of seven randomized phase III trials, involving a total of 3,850 patients. Crizotinib arms were pooled as the common comparator. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint, assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and restricted mean survival time (RMST). Subgroup analyses focused on patients with baseline central nervous system (CNS) metastases.
All ALKi significantly improved PFS compared to crizotinib. Lorlatinib showed the most meaningful improvement, with the greatest benefit in both overall PFS (HR=0.28; 95% CI 0.21-0.38) and CNS PFS (HR=0.09; 95% CI 0.04-0.2). In direct comparisons, lorlatinib outperformed brigatinib (HR=0.59; 95% CI 0.39-0.87) and envonalkib (HR=0.52; 95% CI 0.35-0.77) in terms of PFS. While lorlatinib also showed improved PFS compared to alectinib (HR=0.72; 95% CI 0.50-1.04) and ensartinib (HR=0.73; 95% CI 0.48-1.10), these differences were not statistically significant. Lorlatinib demonstrated the greatest benefit in PFS among patients with baseline CNS metastases.
In this indirect comparison using reconstructed patient data, lorlatinib emerged as the most effective ALKi, showed the most favorable HR for PFS compared to the other ALKi, although it did not reach statistical significance versus alectinib and ensartinib. Additionally, lorlatinib showed the highest efficacy in the control of CNS progression.
间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)抑制剂(ALKi)是转移性ALK阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗方法。第二代和第三代ALKi,包括阿来替尼、布加替尼、恩扎替尼、恩沃利替尼和洛拉替尼,已显示出比克唑替尼更好的疗效。然而,由于这些药物之间缺乏直接的头对头比较,转移性ALK阳性NSCLC的最佳治疗方法仍不明确。
本研究采用来自Kaplan-Meier曲线的个体患者数据(IPDfromKM)方法,从7项随机III期试验的Kaplan-Meier曲线中重建患者水平的数据,共涉及3850例患者。将克唑替尼组作为共同对照。无进展生存期(PFS)是主要终点,使用Cox比例风险模型和受限平均生存时间(RMST)进行评估。亚组分析集中于基线有中枢神经系统(CNS)转移的患者。
与克唑替尼相比,所有ALKi均显著改善了PFS。洛拉替尼显示出最有意义的改善,在总体PFS(HR=0.28;95%CI 0.21-0.38)和CNS PFS(HR=0.09;95%CI 0.04-0.2)方面获益最大。在直接比较中,洛拉替尼在PFS方面优于布加替尼(HR=0.59;95%CI 0.39-0.87)和恩沃利替尼(HR=0.52;95%CI 0.35-0.77)。虽然洛拉替尼与阿来替尼(HR=0.72;95%CI 0.50-1.04)和恩扎替尼(HR=0.73;95%CI 0.48-1.10)相比PFS也有所改善,但这些差异无统计学意义。洛拉替尼在基线有CNS转移的患者中PFS获益最大。
在这项使用重建患者数据的间接比较中,洛拉替尼成为最有效的ALKi,与其他ALKi相比,其PFS的HR最有利,尽管与阿来替尼和恩扎替尼相比未达到统计学意义。此外,洛拉替尼在控制CNS进展方面显示出最高疗效。