Lotfy Khaled, Shome-Vasanthan Epsita, Silver Samuel A, Glavinovic Tamara
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Center, Western University, ON, Canada.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2025 May 22;12:20543581251323947. doi: 10.1177/20543581251323947. eCollection 2025.
Quality improvement (QI) initiatives use a team-based approach to problem-solving clinical and health system issues. All QI initiatives require the coordinated efforts of health care professionals and other stakeholders to encourage the provision of evidence-based clinical care. Most clinicians understand the principles of QI but may lack the training necessary to undertake individual projects.
An educational, nephrology-oriented clinical case was created based on the IDEAL study on timing of dialysis initiation, a prioritized quality indicator in several provinces. The case illustrates how to utilize commonly employed QI methodology and to provide a pragmatic framework for both developing and running a QI project. Core concepts addressed in this review include how to perform a QI chart audit, identification of a quality-of-care problem, engaging stakeholders, and how to conduct a root cause analysis that leads to selection of QI measures and change solutions. Last, plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles and interpretation of data using run charts are highlighted.
PubMed and Google scholar were used as sources of published QI methodology.
This nephrology-oriented QI case highlights how a core set of QI principles and tools can be used to improve clinical care. This review demonstrates that determining clear goals, utilizing evidence-based guidance to improve timing of dialysis initiation, engaging the appropriate stakeholders, identifying a feasible and measurable change, and tracking if that change leads to improvement are essential components of all QI initiatives. The above framework can be utilized in a variety of clinical areas both within and beyond nephrology-specific care.
Considerations regarding QI-specific data analysis were not addressed as they were beyond the scope of this review.
质量改进(QI)举措采用基于团队的方法来解决临床和卫生系统问题。所有QI举措都需要医护人员和其他利益相关者的协同努力,以鼓励提供循证临床护理。大多数临床医生理解QI的原则,但可能缺乏开展个人项目所需的培训。
基于一项关于透析起始时机的IDEAL研究创建了一个以肾脏病学为导向的教育性临床案例,该研究是多个省份的优先质量指标。该案例说明了如何运用常用的QI方法,并为开展和运行QI项目提供一个实用框架。本综述涉及的核心概念包括如何进行QI图表审核、识别护理质量问题、让利益相关者参与进来,以及如何进行根本原因分析以选择QI措施和变革解决方案。最后,重点介绍了计划-实施-研究-改进(PDSA)循环以及使用运行图对数据进行解读。
PubMed和谷歌学术被用作已发表的QI方法的信息来源。
这个以肾脏病学为导向的QI案例突出了一套核心的QI原则和工具如何用于改善临床护理。本综述表明,确定明确目标、利用循证指南改善透析起始时机、让合适的利益相关者参与、识别可行且可衡量的变革,以及追踪该变革是否带来改善,是所有QI举措的重要组成部分。上述框架可用于肾脏病专科护理内外的各种临床领域。
由于超出了本综述的范围,未涉及有关QI特定数据分析的考量。