• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们应该何时开始透析?一个长期存在问题的情况以及理想研究后的当下局面。

When should we commence dialysis? The story of a lingering problem and today's scene after the IDEAL study.

作者信息

Pollock Carol A, Cooper Bruce A, Harris David C

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Jun;27(6):2162-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs125.

DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfs125
PMID:22649211
Abstract

Over the last 15-20 years, there has been an increasing trend for dialysis to be commenced earlier in the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The drivers for initiation of dialysis at higher levels of renal function are complex but were primarily based on the assumption that by improving solute and water clearances with earlier dialysis, morbidity, mortality and quality of life would be improved. The Initiating Dialysis Early and Late (IDEAL) trial definitively demonstrated that elective earlier initiation of dialysis was not associated with improved clinical outcomes or quality of life. Indeed, no subset of patients was found to benefit from earlier dialysis. Observational data suggests that patients who commence dialysis with higher levels of renal function are more likely to have significant comorbidity that results in higher mortality rates compared to patients who remain clinically well and biochemically stable and are able to defer the initiation of dialysis till later in the course of CKD. However, patients who are able to defer dialysis should have appropriate access created so as to avoid the use of temporary catheters and to facilitate initiation using the preferred dialysis modality. Estimates of glomerular filtration rates in Stage 5 CKD have been poorly validated and should not be used as the key determinant influencing the commencement of dialysis. The results of the IDEAL trial have influenced guidelines internationally and provide clinicians, patients and health care providers with important information to drive clinical decision making and rational service planning.

摘要

在过去的15至20年里,慢性肾脏病(CKD)发展过程中更早开始透析的趋势日益明显。在肾功能较高水平时开始透析的驱动因素较为复杂,但主要基于这样一种假设,即通过早期透析改善溶质和水分清除率,发病率、死亡率和生活质量将会得到改善。早期与晚期开始透析(IDEAL)试验明确表明,选择性地更早开始透析与改善临床结局或生活质量并无关联。事实上,未发现有亚组患者能从早期透析中获益。观察数据表明,与那些临床状况良好、生化指标稳定且能够将透析起始推迟至CKD病程后期的患者相比,在肾功能较高水平时开始透析的患者更有可能患有严重合并症,从而导致更高的死亡率。然而,能够推迟透析的患者应建立合适的血管通路,以避免使用临时导管,并便于采用首选的透析方式开始透析。5期CKD患者肾小球滤过率的估计值尚未得到充分验证,不应将其用作影响透析开始的关键决定因素。IDEAL试验的结果已在国际上影响了相关指南,并为临床医生、患者和医疗服务提供者提供了重要信息,以推动临床决策和合理的服务规划。

相似文献

1
When should we commence dialysis? The story of a lingering problem and today's scene after the IDEAL study.我们应该何时开始透析?一个长期存在问题的情况以及理想研究后的当下局面。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Jun;27(6):2162-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs125.
2
[When to start dialysis. The predialysis patient].[何时开始透析。透析前患者]
G Ital Nefrol. 2008 May-Jun;25 Suppl 41:S9-12, discussion S13-20.
3
Early start peritoneal dialysis.早期开始腹膜透析
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2007 Jul;14(3):e27-34. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2007.04.004.
4
Factors affecting survival in advanced chronic kidney disease patients who choose not to receive dialysis.影响选择不接受透析的晚期慢性肾病患者生存的因素。
Ren Fail. 2007;29(6):653-9. doi: 10.1080/08860220701459634.
5
When to initiate dialysis--is early start always better?何时开始透析——早期开始总是更好吗?
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Jul;26(7):2087-91. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr181. Epub 2011 May 4.
6
Repercussions of early versus late initiation of dialysis.早期与晚期开始透析的后果。
Nefrologia. 2011;31(4):392-6. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Mar.10795. Epub 2011 May 30.
7
Cost-effectiveness of initiating dialysis early: a randomized controlled trial.早期开始透析的成本效益:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 May;57(5):707-15. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.12.018. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
8
Early start of dialysis: a critical review.早期开始透析:一项批判性评价。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 May;6(5):1222-8. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09301010.
9
Optimal timing of initiation of chronic hemodialysis?慢性血液透析开始的最佳时机?
Hemodial Int. 2007 Apr;11(2):263-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2007.00178.x.
10
[The grey line of dialysis initiation: as early as possible that is, by the incremental modality].[透析开始的灰色界限:即尽早开始,采用递增模式]
G Ital Nefrol. 2010 Nov-Dec;27(6):574-83.

引用本文的文献

1
How Can We Decrease Early Dialysis Initiation? An Interactive Quality Improvement Teaching Case for Health Care Providers and Narrative Review of Quality Improvement Methodology.我们如何减少早期透析的启动?一个面向医疗保健提供者的交互式质量改进教学案例及质量改进方法的叙述性综述。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2025 May 22;12:20543581251323947. doi: 10.1177/20543581251323947. eCollection 2025.
2
Abrupt Decline in Kidney Function Precipitating Initiation of Chronic Renal Replacement Therapy.肾功能急剧下降促使启动慢性肾脏替代治疗。
Kidney Int Rep. 2017 Dec 23;3(3):602-609. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.12.007. eCollection 2018 May.
3
Timing of Dialysis Initiation: What Has Changed Since IDEAL?
透析开始的时机:自IDEAL研究以来有哪些变化?
Semin Nephrol. 2017 Mar;37(2):181-193. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2016.12.008.
4
An instrumental variable approach finds no associated harm or benefit with early dialysis initiation in the United States.在美国,一种工具变量法未发现早期开始透析存在相关危害或益处。
Kidney Int. 2014 Oct;86(4):798-809. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.110. Epub 2014 Apr 30.