Lombo-Moreno Carlos, La Rotta David, Pardo-Ortiz Manuelita, Avila Fredy Alexander, Cañadas Raul Antonio, Muñoz Óscar, Hani Albis Cecilia
Internal Medicine Department, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cra 7 #40-62, Bogotá 110231, Colombia.
Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 May 22;18:17562848251340495. doi: 10.1177/17562848251340495. eCollection 2025.
BACKGROUND: In 2023, the diagnostic criteria for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were updated in the Lyon Consensus 2.0. It is important to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of complementary tests used for GERD diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of mean nocturnal basal impedance (MNBI) measured by pH-metry in patients with suspected GERD compared to the updated 2023 Lyon Consensus Diagnostic Criteria and to identify the optimal cutoff point for diagnosis. DESIGN: Diagnostic test study based on a retrospective cohort of patients with suspected GERD. METHODS: Diagnosis was confirmed using the updated Lyon criteria as the gold standard. We evaluated sensitivity, specificity, and discriminatory ability via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). The best cutoff point was determined using Liu's method for MNBI, number of reflux episodes, number of acid reflux episodes, DeMeester score, and bolus exposure time. ROC curves were compared using DeLong's method. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were included, with 26 diagnosed positive and 29 negative for GERD. MNBI yielded an AUC-ROC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64-0.89); at 1590 ohms, sensitivity and specificity were 69.2% and 72.4%, respectively. The DeMeester score demonstrated superior discriminatory ability over MNBI ( = 0.03), with an AUC-ROC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-1.00), sensitivity of 92%, and specificity of 93% at a cutoff of 15.6. No significant differences in discriminatory ability were observed when comparing MNBI with other complementary tests ( < 0.05). CONCLUSION: MNBI and other complementary tests showed suboptimal characteristics for GERD diagnosis. These tests should be interpreted alongside clinical, endoscopic, and pH-metry findings. The DeMeester score seems promising, but further prospective studies are needed to prove its utility.
背景:2023年,《里昂共识2.0》更新了胃食管反流病(GERD)的诊断标准。研究用于GERD诊断的补充检查的诊断准确性很重要。 目的:与2023年更新的里昂共识诊断标准相比,确定通过pH值测定法测量的平均夜间基础阻抗(MNBI)在疑似GERD患者中的诊断准确性,并确定诊断的最佳截断点。 设计:基于疑似GERD患者的回顾性队列的诊断试验研究。 方法:以更新后的里昂标准作为金标准来确诊。我们通过受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)评估敏感性、特异性和鉴别能力。使用刘法确定MNBI、反流发作次数、酸反流发作次数、DeMeester评分和团块暴露时间的最佳截断点。使用DeLong法比较ROC曲线。 结果:共纳入55例患者,其中26例GERD诊断为阳性,29例为阴性。MNBI的AUC-ROC为0.77(95%置信区间(CI):0.64-0.89);在1590欧姆时,敏感性和特异性分别为69.2%和72.4%。DeMeester评分显示出比MNBI更好的鉴别能力(P=0.03),AUC-ROC为0.90(95%CI:0.80-1.00),在截断值为15.6时,敏感性为92%,特异性为93%。将MNBI与其他补充检查进行比较时,未观察到鉴别能力的显著差异(P<0.05)。 结论:MNBI和其他补充检查在GERD诊断中表现出次优特征。这些检查应结合临床、内镜和pH值测定结果进行解释。DeMeester评分似乎很有前景,但需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证明其效用。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025-5-20
World J Gastroenterol. 2024-7-14
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025-2
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021-7-29
Gastroenterology. 2014-10-16
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013-2
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012-7-10