• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

箭毒蛙自发任务中的数量辨别

Quantity discrimination in a spontaneous task in a poison frog.

作者信息

Khatiwada Sunil, Burmeister Sabrina S

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 27599, USA.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2022 Feb;25(1):27-32. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01528-x. Epub 2021 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-021-01528-x
PMID:34322772
Abstract

The use of quantitative information underlies a range of animal behaviors. There are thought to be two parallel systems for judging quantity: a precise representation of small numbers of objects, typically less than 4, that can be tracked visually (object tracking system) and an imprecise system for larger quantities (approximate number system) governed by Weber's law. Using a spontaneous discrimination task with live prey, we examined the ability of the poison frog Dendrobates auratus to discriminate quantities of low (1-4) or high (4-16) numerosity over a range of ratio contrasts (0.33, 0.5, 0.67, 0.75). Similar to a previous study in treefrogs, we found that the poison frogs chose the larger quantity of flies when choosing between 1 and 3 and between 1 and 2. However, their performance was near chance when choosing between 2 and 3 and below chance when choosing between 3 and 4. When the numerosity of flies was higher, they did not discriminate between the larger and smaller quantity. Our findings are consistent with the ability of poison frogs to discriminate small quantities of objects using an object tracking system, but could also reflect a singular vs. plural discrimination. We did not find evidence of an approximate number system governed by Weber's law, nor evidence of a speed-accuracy tradeoff. However, total set size was associated with lower accuracy and longer latencies to choose. Future studies should explore quantity discrimination in additional contexts to better understand the limits of these abilities in poison frogs.

摘要

定量信息的运用是一系列动物行为的基础。人们认为存在两种判断数量的并行系统:一种是对少量物体(通常少于4个)的精确表征,这些物体可以通过视觉追踪(物体追踪系统);另一种是对大量物体的不精确系统(近似数字系统),受韦伯定律支配。我们利用对活猎物的自发辨别任务,研究了箭毒蛙金色丛蛙在一系列比例对比(0.33、0.5、0.67、0.75)下区分低数量(1 - 4)或高数量(4 - 16)的能力。与之前对树蛙的一项研究类似,我们发现箭毒蛙在1和3之间以及1和2之间进行选择时会选择数量较多的苍蝇。然而,它们在2和3之间进行选择时表现接近随机水平,在3和4之间进行选择时表现低于随机水平。当苍蝇数量较多时,它们无法区分数量多与数量少的情况。我们的研究结果与箭毒蛙利用物体追踪系统区分少量物体的能力一致,但也可能反映了单数与复数的辨别。我们没有发现受韦伯定律支配的近似数字系统的证据,也没有发现速度 - 准确性权衡的证据。然而,总集合大小与较低的准确性和更长的选择潜伏期相关。未来的研究应该在更多背景下探索数量辨别,以更好地理解箭毒蛙这些能力的局限性。

相似文献

1
Quantity discrimination in a spontaneous task in a poison frog.箭毒蛙自发任务中的数量辨别
Anim Cogn. 2022 Feb;25(1):27-32. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01528-x. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
2
Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber's law.天使鱼(Pterophyllum scalare)能数数吗?对不同鱼群大小的辨别遵循了韦伯定律。
Anim Cogn. 2011 Jan;14(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0337-6. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
3
Quantity Discrimination in Domestic Rats, Rattus norvegicus.家鼠(Rattus norvegicus)的数量辨别能力。
Animals (Basel). 2016 Aug 3;6(8):46. doi: 10.3390/ani6080046.
4
A cognitive map in a poison frog.毒蛙的认知图谱。
J Exp Biol. 2019 Jun 10;222(Pt 11):jeb197467. doi: 10.1242/jeb.197467.
5
A shared system of representation governing quantity discrimination in canids.一种共同的代表系统,用于控制犬类的数量辨别。
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 8;3:387. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00387. eCollection 2012.
6
Poison frog dietary preference depends on prey type and alkaloid load.毒蛙的食性取决于猎物类型和生物碱负荷。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0276331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276331. eCollection 2022.
7
Superior continuous quantity discrimination in a freshwater turtle.淡水龟卓越的连续数量辨别能力。
Front Zool. 2021 Sep 25;18(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12983-021-00431-y.
8
Orientation by environmental geometry and feature cues in the green and black poison frog (Dendrobates auratus).绿黑丛蛙(Dendrobates auratus)利用环境几何形状和特征线索进行定向。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Nov;26(6):2023-2030. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01820-y. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
9
Investigating signal modalities of aposematism in a poison frog.探究毒蛙警戒信号的模态。
J Evol Biol. 2023 Jul;36(7):1003-1009. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14111. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
10
Quantity Discrimination in Wolves (Canis lupus).狼(Canis lupus)的数量辨别能力。
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 16;3:505. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00505. eCollection 2012.

引用本文的文献

1
Group size affects spontaneous quantity discrimination performance in wild Western Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen dorsalis).群体规模会影响西澳大利亚野生喜鹊(Gymnorhina tibicen dorsalis)的自发数量辨别能力。
Anim Cogn. 2025 May 26;28(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01963-0.
2
Investigating the relationship between physical cognitive tasks and a social cognitive task in a wild bird.研究野生鸟类的身体认知任务与社会认知任务之间的关系。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Jul 26;27(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01892-4.
3
A perspective on neuroethology: what the past teaches us about the future of neuroethology.

本文引用的文献

1
Prosimian primates show ratio dependence in spontaneous quantity discriminations.原猴类在自发数量辨别中表现出比率依赖性。
Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 17;3:550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00550. eCollection 2012.
2
Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) sacrifice foraging speed to solve difficult colour discrimination tasks.大黄蜂(Bombus terrestris)会牺牲觅食速度来解决困难的颜色辨别任务。
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2004 Sep;190(9):759-63. doi: 10.1007/s00359-004-0547-y. Epub 2004 Aug 13.
神经行为学视角:过去对神经行为学未来的启示。
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2024 Mar;210(2):325-346. doi: 10.1007/s00359-024-01695-5. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
4
Underestimation in temporal numerosity judgments computationally explained by population coding model.群体编码模型计算解释时间数量判断中的低估现象。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 17;12(1):15632. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19941-8.
5
Zebrafish excel in number discrimination under an operant conditioning paradigm.斑马鱼在操作性条件反射范式下擅长进行数字辨别。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Aug;25(4):917-933. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01602-y. Epub 2022 Feb 18.