Suppr超能文献

RECAPACITA项目:重度精神障碍患者临床、神经心理学及功能特征以及部分和全部能力改变的比较研究

The RECAPACITA PROJECT: comparative study of the clinical, neuropsychological, and functional profile of people with severe mental disorder and partial and total capacity modification.

作者信息

Marcó-García Silvia, Guilera Georgina, Ferrer-Quintero Marta, Ochoa Susana, Escuder-Romeva Gemma, Rubio-Abadal Elena, Martínez-Mondejar Arantxa, Del Cacho Núria, Montalbán-Roca Vanessa, Escanilla-Casal Ana, Balsells-Mejía Sol, Huerta-Ramos Elena

机构信息

Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.

Etiopathogenesis and Treatment of Severe Mental Disorders (MERITT), Sant Joan de Déu Research Institute, Sant Joan de Déu Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02907-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluating the decision-making capacity of individuals with Severe Mental Disorder (SMD) is essential for compliance with the 2006 Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities. In Spain, capacity was historically determined through judicial procedures, resulting in partial or total capacity modification (CM). The abolition of this procedure in 2021 has left a gap in addressing the needs of this population, creating challenges under the new legal framework.

AIM

The RECAPACITA project studied the clinical, neuropsychological, and functional profiles of individuals with SMD and CM, focusing on differences between partial (pCM) and total (tCM) modifications.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 77 adult patients with SMD and CM (47 tCM, 30 pCM) from the Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu mental health network (Spain). Sociodemographic, clinical, functional, and neuropsychological data were collected, along with an independent assessment of mental capacity.

RESULTS

Around 87% of sample had a schizophrenia spectrum disorder; pCM patients presented more substance-related and personality disorders as a secondary diagnosis. While no statistically significant differences were observed between groups, clinically, tCM group presents greater clinical alteration, lower insight, sustained attention, coding capacity, processing speed and resistance to interference compared to pCM group. tCM group had worse social functioning, and lower scores in reasoning and appreciation when assessing mental capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with tCM show greater clinical impairment and higher support needs compared to those with pCM. With the practical and legal abolition of tCM, it is essential to ensure that these individuals' persistent challenges are adequately addressed, as their needs remain significant despite the disappearance of this legal category.

摘要

背景

评估重度精神障碍(SMD)患者的决策能力对于遵守2006年《残疾人权利公约》至关重要。在西班牙,能力历史上是通过司法程序确定的,导致部分或全部能力变更(CM)。2021年该程序的废除在满足这一人群需求方面留下了空白,在新的法律框架下带来了挑战。

目的

RECAPACITA项目研究了患有SMD和CM的个体的临床、神经心理学和功能特征,重点关注部分(pCM)和全部(tCM)变更之间的差异。

方法

对来自西班牙圣琼·德乌斯心理健康网络的77名患有SMD和CM的成年患者(47名tCM,30名pCM)进行了横断面研究。收集了社会人口统计学、临床、功能和神经心理学数据,以及对心理能力的独立评估。

结果

约87%的样本患有精神分裂症谱系障碍;pCM患者作为次要诊断表现出更多与物质相关的障碍和人格障碍。虽然两组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异,但在临床上,与pCM组相比,tCM组表现出更大的临床改变、更低的洞察力、持续注意力、编码能力、处理速度和抗干扰能力。tCM组的社会功能较差,在评估心理能力时推理和理解得分较低。

结论

与pCM患者相比,tCM患者表现出更大的临床损害和更高的支持需求。随着tCM在实践和法律上的废除,必须确保这些个体持续存在的挑战得到充分解决,因为尽管这一法律类别消失,他们的需求仍然很大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验