• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进数字健康领域的包容性共同创造。

Fostering inclusive co-creation in digital health.

作者信息

Blasimme Alessandro, Landers Constantin, Vayena Effy

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 26;8(1):311. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01724-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-025-01724-w
PMID:40419734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12106736/
Abstract

Research on responsible digital health innovation has typically focused on technical aspects such as the reliability and trustworthiness. More recently, work in responsible digital health innovation has started to recognize that, to address those concerns, stakeholder involvement is key. Aligning technological advancements with stakeholders’ needs requires deliberate and inclusive processes. Such processes must incorporate diverse perspectives, including those of the users of digital health technologies, such as healthcare practitionerss and patients.

摘要

对负责任的数字健康创新的研究通常侧重于技术方面,如可靠性和可信度。最近,负责任的数字健康创新工作开始认识到,为了解决这些问题,利益相关者的参与是关键。使技术进步与利益相关者的需求保持一致需要深思熟虑且包容各方的过程。这样的过程必须纳入不同的观点,包括数字健康技术用户的观点,如医疗从业者和患者。

相似文献

1
Fostering inclusive co-creation in digital health.促进数字健康领域的包容性共同创造。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 26;8(1):311. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01724-w.
2
Integrating patient voices in digital health research design: The ProPacient Decalogue.将患者意见纳入数字健康研究设计:ProPacient十诫。
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Sep;138:109180. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.109180. Epub 2025 May 17.
3
Equity and inclusivity in research: co-creation of a digital platform with representatives of marginalized populations to enhance the involvement in research of people with limited literacy skills.研究中的公平性与包容性:与边缘化群体代表共同创建数字平台,以提高识字能力有限人群对研究的参与度。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 5;7(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00313-x.
4
Building the Business Case for an Inclusive Approach to Digital Health Measurement With a Web App (Market Opportunity Calculator): Instrument Development Study.利用网络应用构建数字健康测量包容性方法的商业案例(市场机会计算器):工具开发研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jul 26;7:e45713. doi: 10.2196/45713.
5
The influence of patient self-efficacy on value co-creation behavior and outcomes in chronic disease management: a cross-sectional study.患者自我效能对慢性病管理中价值共创行为及结果的影响:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 8;25(1):1699. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22917-8.
6
Impact of digital inclusive finance on agricultural total factor productivity in Zhejiang Province from the perspective of integrated development of rural industries.从农村产业融合发展视角看数字包容性金融对浙江省农业全要素生产率的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 5;19(4):e0298034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298034. eCollection 2024.
7
The impact of digital inclusive finance on SMEs' technological innovation activities-Empirical analysis based on the data of new third board enterprises.数字包容性金融对中小企业技术创新活动的影响——基于新三板企业数据的实证分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 2;18(11):e0293500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293500. eCollection 2023.
8
An accessible and inclusive public transportation management response to COVID-19 through a co-creation process with people with disability. The case of Metro Barcelona.通过与残疾人共同创造的过程,对新冠疫情做出无障碍且包容的公共交通管理应对措施。巴塞罗那地铁的案例。
Res Transp Bus Manag. 2022 Dec;45:100880. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100880. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
9
Co-creating a new Charter for equitable and inclusive co-creation: insights from an international forum of academic and lived experience experts.共同制定新的公平包容共创宪章:来自学术和生活经验专家国际论坛的见解。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 19;14(3):e078950. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078950.
10
Digital storytelling to promote disability-inclusive research in Africa.通过数字叙事促进非洲包容性残疾研究。
Afr J Disabil. 2024 Sep 30;13:1495. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v13i0.1495. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of digital health technologies on moral responsibility: a scoping review.数字健康技术对道德责任的影响:一项范围综述
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Mar;28(1):17-31. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10238-3. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
2
Methods Used in Co-Creation Within the Health CASCADE Co-Creation Database and Gray Literature: Systematic Methods Overview.健康级联共创数据库与灰色文献中使用的共创方法:系统方法概述
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Nov 11;13:e59772. doi: 10.2196/59772.
3
The case for inclusive co-creation in digital health innovation.数字健康创新中包容性共同创造的理由。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Sep 16;7(1):251. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01256-9.
4
Mapping the regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence in health within the European Union.绘制欧盟范围内人工智能在医疗领域的监管格局。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Aug 27;7(1):229. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01221-6.
5
Sync fast and solve things-best practices for responsible digital health.快速同步并解决问题——负责任数字健康的最佳实践。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 May 4;7(1):113. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01105-9.
6
Establishing a Health CASCADE-Curated Open-Access Database to Consolidate Knowledge About Co-Creation: Novel Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Methodology Based on Systematic Reviews.建立一个健康 CASCADE 策划的开放获取数据库,以整合关于共同创造的知识:基于系统评价的新型人工智能辅助方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 18;25:e45059. doi: 10.2196/45059.
7
Stuck in translation: Stakeholder perspectives on impediments to responsible digital health.陷入翻译困境:利益相关者对负责任数字健康的障碍的看法
Front Digit Health. 2023 Feb 6;5:1069410. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1069410. eCollection 2023.