• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字健康创新中包容性共同创造的理由。

The case for inclusive co-creation in digital health innovation.

作者信息

Nickel Grace C, Wang Serena, Kwong Jethro C C, Kvedar Joseph C

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Sep 16;7(1):251. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01256-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-024-01256-9
PMID:39284925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11405661/
Abstract

This piece critiques the exclusion of healthcare practitioners (HCPs) from the digital health innovation process. Drawing on “Sync fast and solve things—best practices for responsible digital health” by Landers et al., the editorial argues for the importance of inclusive co-creation, in which clinicians play an active role in developing digital health solutions. It emphasizes that without the meaningful involvement of HCPs, digital health tools risk being clinically irrelevant.

摘要

本文批评了将医疗从业者排除在数字健康创新过程之外的做法。该社论借鉴了兰德斯等人所著的《快速同步并解决问题——负责任的数字健康最佳实践》,主张包容性共同创造的重要性,即临床医生在开发数字健康解决方案中发挥积极作用。它强调,如果医疗从业者没有实质性参与,数字健康工具可能在临床上毫无意义。

相似文献

1
The case for inclusive co-creation in digital health innovation.数字健康创新中包容性共同创造的理由。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Sep 16;7(1):251. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01256-9.
2
Research on value co-creation mechanism of platform enterprises in digital innovation ecosystem: A case study on Haier HOPE platform in China.数字创新生态系统中平台企业价值共创机制研究:以中国海尔 HOPE 平台为例
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 25;13:1055932. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1055932. eCollection 2022.
3
Sync fast and solve things-best practices for responsible digital health.快速同步并解决问题——负责任数字健康的最佳实践。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 May 4;7(1):113. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01105-9.
4
Digital inclusive finance, financial mismatch and the innovation capacity of small and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from Chinese listed companies.数字普惠金融、金融错配与中小企业创新能力:来自中国上市公司的证据
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 14;9(2):e13792. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13792. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
The impact of digital inclusive finance on corporate ESG performance: based on the perspective of corporate green technology innovation.数字包容性金融对企业 ESG 绩效的影响:基于企业绿色技术创新的视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(24):65314-65327. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27057-3. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
6
Towards successful digital transformation through co-creation: a longitudinal study of a four-year implementation of digital monitoring technology in residential care for persons with dementia.通过共创实现成功的数字化转型:一项对痴呆症患者居家护理中数字监测技术四年实施情况的纵向研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4191-1.
7
The impact of digital inclusive finance on SMEs' technological innovation activities-Empirical analysis based on the data of new third board enterprises.数字包容性金融对中小企业技术创新活动的影响——基于新三板企业数据的实证分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 2;18(11):e0293500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293500. eCollection 2023.
8
Co-creation in a digital health living lab: A case study.数字健康生活实验室中的共同创造:案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;10:892930. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.892930. eCollection 2022.
9
How can technology leverage university teaching & learning innovation? A longitudinal case study of diffusion of technology innovation from the knowledge creation perspective.技术如何推动大学教学与学习创新?从知识创造视角对技术创新扩散的纵向案例研究。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 Apr 29:1-27. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11780-y.
10
Equity and inclusivity in research: co-creation of a digital platform with representatives of marginalized populations to enhance the involvement in research of people with limited literacy skills.研究中的公平性与包容性:与边缘化群体代表共同创建数字平台,以提高识字能力有限人群对研究的参与度。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 5;7(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00313-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Fostering inclusive co-creation in digital health.促进数字健康领域的包容性共同创造。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 26;8(1):311. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01724-w.
2
Usability testing a web application to support evidence-based commissioning decisions for implementing mobile stroke units.对一个网络应用程序进行可用性测试,以支持关于实施移动卒中单元的循证委托决策。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 9;8(1):264. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01691-2.
3
Digital twin assisted surgery, concept, opportunities, and challenges.数字孪生辅助手术:概念、机遇与挑战
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jan 15;8(1):32. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01413-0.
4
An umbrella review on how digital health intervention co-design is conducted and described.关于数字健康干预协同设计如何开展及描述的一项伞状综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Dec 23;7(1):374. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01385-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Sync fast and solve things-best practices for responsible digital health.快速同步并解决问题——负责任数字健康的最佳实践。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 May 4;7(1):113. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01105-9.
2
The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review.利用共同生产、共同设计和共同创作来调动健康状况管理中的知识:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):877. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y.
3
Assessing the Clinical Robustness of Digital Health Startups: Cross-sectional Observational Analysis.评估数字健康创业公司的临床稳健性:横断面观察性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 20;24(6):e37677. doi: 10.2196/37677.
4
The Rise of the Empowered Physician in the Digital Health Era: Viewpoint.数字健康时代赋能医生的崛起:观点
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 26;21(3):e12490. doi: 10.2196/12490.