Paton Madison C B, Griffin Alexandra R, Blatch-Williams Remy, Webb Annabel, Verter Frances, Couto Pedro S, Bersenev Alexey, Dale Russell C, Popat Himanshu, Novak Iona, Finch-Edmondson Megan
Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Institute, Speciality of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Cells. 2025 May 12;14(10):700. doi: 10.3390/cells14100700.
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been under clinical investigation for the treatment of cerebral palsy (CP) for over a decade. However, the field has been limited by study heterogeneity and variable reports of efficacy. We conducted a scoping review of published and registered reports of MSC treatment for CP, with meta-analysis of Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) outcomes to summarize research and provide future recommendations. Thirty published reports and 10 registered trials were identified, including 1292 people with CP receiving MSCs. Most received ≥2 doses (72%) of umbilical cord tissue MSCs (75%), intrathecally (40%) or intravenously (38%), and 31% were treated via compassionate/Expanded access. MSC treatment was safe and meta-analyses demonstrated that MSCs conferred significant improvements in GMFM at 3 - (1.05 (0.19-1.92), = 0.02), 6 - (0.97 (0.30-1.64), = 0.005) and 12 months (0.99 (0.30-1.67), = 0.005) post-treatment. Whilst MSCs are safe and improve GMFM outcomes in CP with large effect sizes, study and participant variability continues to confound data interpretation and limits subgroup analyses. With no published Phase 3 trials and high rates of compassionate access, the field would benefit from well-designed trials with unified outcomes. Additionally, data sharing to enable Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis would support the determination of optimal source, route and dose to progress towards regulatory approval.
间充质基质细胞(MSCs)用于治疗脑瘫(CP)的临床研究已开展了十多年。然而,该领域受到研究异质性和疗效报告不一的限制。我们对已发表和注册的MSCs治疗CP的报告进行了范围综述,并对粗大运动功能测量(GMFM)结果进行了荟萃分析,以总结研究情况并提供未来建议。共识别出30篇已发表报告和10项注册试验,其中包括1292例接受MSCs治疗的CP患者。大多数患者接受了≥2剂(72%)脐带组织间充质干细胞(75%),给药途径为鞘内注射(40%)或静脉注射(38%),31%的患者通过同情用药/扩大使用途径接受治疗。MSCs治疗是安全的,荟萃分析表明,治疗后3个月(1.05(0.19 - 1.92),P = 0.02)、6个月(0.97(0.30 - 1.64),P = 0.005)和12个月(0.99(0.30 - 1.67),P = 0.005)时,MSCs能使GMFM有显著改善。虽然MSCs是安全的,且能在CP中显著改善GMFM结果,但研究和参与者的变异性仍使数据解释复杂化,并限制了亚组分析。由于没有已发表的3期试验,且同情用药比例较高,该领域将受益于设计良好、结果统一的试验。此外,通过数据共享实现个体参与者数据荟萃分析,将有助于确定最佳来源、途径和剂量,以推动监管审批。