Masking Ability of CAD-CAM Materials at Different Thicknesses: A Study on Color, Translucency, and Infinite Optical Thickness.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the masking ability of different thicknesses of CAD-CAM resin-matrix and feldspar porcelain materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens (Ø7.5 mm, thickness 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mm, n = 3/material) were fabricated from Lava Ultimate-LU, Grandio Blocs-GB, VITA Enamic-VE, and VITA Mark II-VM. Backgrounds were obtained from nine composite die shades (ND1-ND9, IPS Natural Die Material). Spectral reflectance was measured for samples against a black background and each ND background. CIEDE2000 color differences (ΔE), relative translucency parameter differences (ΔRTP), and infinite optical thickness (X) were calculated. ΔE data among materials were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (α = 0.05). ΔE between thicknesses and ΔRTP data were compared to perceptible and acceptable thresholds. Root mean square error (RMSE) and goodness-of-fit (GFC) were used as performance behavior of X.

RESULTS

VM exhibited the lowest ΔE (p < 0.001) and ΔRTP values across all tested conditions. Overall, LU and GB did not differ for 0.5 and 1.0 mm. Regardless of the background, when comparing 1.0-1.5 mm, acceptable ΔE were observed, with only VM showing imperceptible values. Good spectral match and good comparative values of X were found for LU-GB.

CONCLUSION

The masking effect depended on material and thickness, with VM and thicker samples demonstrating superior results. In general, the spectral behavior and values of infinite optical thickness differed among materials.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The masking ability of high-translucency CAD-CAM materials was influenced by composition, thickness, and the underlying tooth-colored background. Materials with lower translucency and greater thickness are recommended for highly discolored teeth. Vita Mark II was the most suitable material for restorations on darkened substrates.