Morris Patricia, Moore Jennifer, McCloskey Rose, Furlong Karen
Faculty of Nursing, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada.
Long Term Care Simulation Lab, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB E2K 5E2, Canada.
Nurs Rep. 2025 Apr 26;15(5):140. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15050140.
Person-centered care (PCC) approaches are widely recognized for improving the quality of life of residents living with dementia in long-term care (LTC). However, residents are only one part of the care dyad, and it remains unclear whether PCC also impacts nursing care aides in similarly adventitious ways. Care aides in this context experience significant care strain, which refers to the physical, emotional, and psychological burden experienced by caregivers. While PCC approaches are promoted as the best approach for supporting residents living with dementia, there is limited research on whether their implementation also impacts care aides. This study examined potential associations between organization-level PCC indicators and care strain among nursing care aides who work with residents living with dementia in LTC homes in New Brunswick, Canada. A cross-sectional survey design was used to explore the relationship between PCC approaches and care strain. Care strain was measured using the strain in dementia care scale, including the daily emotions subscale. A modified version of the Dementia Policy Questionnaire assessed the extent to which PCC approaches were implemented in participants' workplaces. Descriptive statistics characterized the sample, and multivariable regression analyses examined associations between PCC indicators and care strain, adjusting for demographic factors. Twenty-eight participants completed both measures. Overall, participants reported high levels of care strain but also high levels of positive daily emotions. Findings partially supported the hypothesis that PCC indicators were associated with lower care strain and more positive daily emotions. Certain PCC indicators, such as structured education and ethical support, appeared particularly beneficial. Implications for Practice: Strengthening PCC practices-especially through hands-on training and ethical support-may help reduce care strain and enhance care aides' emotional well-being. LTC facilities that prioritize these strategies over policy implementation alone may improve both staff well-being and quality of care for residents.
以人为主的护理(PCC)方法在改善长期护理(LTC)机构中痴呆症患者的生活质量方面得到了广泛认可。然而,居民只是护理二元组的一部分,目前尚不清楚PCC是否也会以类似的有利方式影响护理助理。在这种情况下,护理助理会经历巨大的护理压力,这是指护理人员所经历的身体、情感和心理负担。虽然PCC方法被推崇为支持痴呆症患者的最佳方法,但关于其实施是否也会影响护理助理的研究却很有限。本研究调查了加拿大新不伦瑞克省长期护理机构中与痴呆症患者一起工作的护理助理的组织层面PCC指标与护理压力之间的潜在关联。采用横断面调查设计来探索PCC方法与护理压力之间的关系。使用痴呆症护理压力量表(包括日常情绪子量表)来测量护理压力。一份经过修改的《痴呆症政策问卷》评估了PCC方法在参与者工作场所的实施程度。描述性统计描述了样本特征,多变量回归分析检验了PCC指标与护理压力之间的关联,并对人口统计学因素进行了调整。28名参与者完成了这两项测量。总体而言,参与者报告了高水平的护理压力,但也有高水平的积极日常情绪。研究结果部分支持了以下假设:PCC指标与较低的护理压力和更积极的日常情绪相关。某些PCC指标,如结构化教育和道德支持,似乎特别有益。对实践的启示:加强PCC实践——特别是通过实践培训和道德支持——可能有助于减轻护理压力,提高护理助理的情绪幸福感。仅将政策实施置于次要地位而优先考虑这些策略的长期护理机构可能会改善员工的幸福感和居民的护理质量。