Toro Camilo, Eromosele Oseiwe B, Flynn David B, Wilson Andrew A, Kotton Darrell N, Hughes Timothy M, Moreira-Bouchard Jesse D, Post Wendy S, Bertoni Alain G, Benjamin Emelia J, Gopal Deepa M, Fetterman Jessica L
Evans Department of Medicine and Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Medical Sciences and Education, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2512133. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.12133.
Research biobanks of human cells and tissues, particularly tissues accessible only after death, are crucial for advancing the understanding of human pathophysiological function. Research biobanks are bereft of tissues from individuals of diverse races and ethnicities, thus limiting the generalizability of biobank findings.
To evaluate the barriers and facilitators to participation in postmortem brain donation for research among individuals from historically marginalized races and ethnicities.
The published literature in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases was searched from 1973 to January 1, 2024. Studies that were written in English that involved adult participants (aged ≥18 years) and explored attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs on solid organ donation were included. Studies in which organ donation was for transplant and not for research, studies examining pediatric organ donation, narratives or perspectives, and studies that did not examine attitudes or beliefs toward organ donation were excluded. Two authors independently coded and performed a thematic analysis of eligible studies.
Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, which involved 12 124 participants across multiple self-reported races and ethnicities (eg, Black or African American, Chinese, Hispanic or Latiné, and White). Most studies (16 [89%]) evaluated perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs among Black or African American and Hispanic or Latiné individuals toward postmortem brain donation. Five themes that informed the decision to donate were identified: information and misconceptions about the organ donation process (16 studies [89%]), mistrust of the research and medical communities (9 studies [50%]), family involvement (9 studies [50%]), religious and cultural beliefs (9 studies [50%]), and altruism (7 studies [39%]). Mistrust and religious and cultural beliefs were largely barriers to considering postmortem organ donation for research. Misconceptions were common, particularly regarding the donation process and purpose of biospecimens for research. Family involvement was both a barrier and a facilitator. Altruism, particularly understanding that organ donation would benefit the participants' family, future generations, and community, was a facilitator.
This systematic review suggests that sharing culturally sensitive information about the organ donation process, engagement of participants and family members in shared decision-making, and addressing barriers and facilitators to donor recruitment practices may increase participation in research biobanks of individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups.
人类细胞和组织研究生物样本库,尤其是那些只有在死后才能获取的组织,对于增进对人类病理生理功能的理解至关重要。研究生物样本库缺乏来自不同种族和族裔个体的组织,从而限制了生物样本库研究结果的普遍性。
评估历史上被边缘化的种族和族裔个体参与死后大脑捐赠用于研究的障碍和促进因素。
检索了1973年至2024年1月1日期间PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和PsycINFO数据库中的已发表文献。纳入了以英文撰写的、涉及成年参与者(年龄≥18岁)且探讨对实体器官捐赠的态度、看法和信念的研究。排除了器官捐赠用于移植而非研究的研究、检查儿科器官捐赠的研究、叙述或观点以及未检查对器官捐赠态度或信念的研究。两位作者独立编码并对符合条件的研究进行了主题分析。
18项研究符合纳入标准,涉及多个自我报告的种族和族裔(如黑人或非裔美国人、华裔、西班牙裔或拉丁裔以及白人)的12124名参与者。大多数研究(16项[89%])评估了黑人或非裔美国人和西班牙裔或拉丁裔个体对死后大脑捐赠的看法、态度和信念。确定了影响捐赠决定的五个主题:关于器官捐赠过程的信息和误解(16项研究[89%])、对研究和医疗界的不信任(9项研究[50%])、家庭参与(9项研究[50%])、宗教和文化信仰(9项研究[50%])以及利他主义(7项研究[39%])。不信任以及宗教和文化信仰在很大程度上是考虑死后器官捐赠用于研究的障碍。误解很常见,尤其是关于捐赠过程和生物样本用于研究的目的。家庭参与既是障碍也是促进因素。利他主义,特别是理解器官捐赠将使参与者的家庭、后代和社区受益,是一个促进因素。
这项系统评价表明,分享关于器官捐赠过程的文化敏感信息、让参与者和家庭成员参与共同决策以及解决捐赠者招募实践中的障碍和促进因素,可能会增加来自代表性不足的种族和族裔群体的个体参与研究生物样本库的比例。