Institute for Advanced Social Studies, Spanish National Research Council, Cordoba, Spain; Public Issues working group, ELPAT-ESOT, Padova, Italy.
Public Issues working group, ELPAT-ESOT, Padova, Italy; Department of Philosophy 1, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2022 Jan;36(1):100673. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100673. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
To assess public knowledge and attitudes towards the family's role in deceased organ donation in Europe.
A systematic search was conducted in CINHAL, MEDLINE, PAIS Index, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science on December 15th, 2017. Eligibility criteria were socio-empirical studies conducted in Europe from 2008 to 2017 addressing either knowledge or attitudes by the public towards the consent system, including the involvement of the family in the decision-making process, for post-mortem organ retrieval. Screening and data collection were performed by two or more independent reviewers for each record.
Of the 1482 results, 467 studies were assessed in full-text form, and 33 were included in this synthesis. When the deceased has not expressed any preference, a majority of the public support the family's role as a surrogate decision-maker. When the deceased expressly consented, the respondents' answers depend on whether they see themselves as potential donors or as a deceased's next-of-kin. Answers also depend on the relationship between the deceased and the decision-maker(s) within the family, and on their ethnic or cultural background.
Public views on the authority of the family in organ donation decision-making requiere further research. A common conceptual framework and validated well-designed questionnaires are needed for future studies. The findings should be considered in the development of Government policy and guidance regarding the role of families in deceased organ donation.
评估欧洲公众对家庭在已故器官捐献中作用的认知和态度。
2017 年 12 月 15 日,在 CINHAL、MEDLINE、PAIS Index、Scopus、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 中进行了系统检索。纳入标准为 2008 年至 2017 年在欧洲进行的社会实证研究,调查公众对同意制度的认知或态度,包括家庭在决定死后器官获取过程中的参与情况。对每篇记录进行了两次或以上的独立审查筛选和数据采集。
在 1482 项研究结果中,有 467 项研究进行了全文评估,有 33 项研究被纳入本综述。当死者没有表达任何偏好时,大多数公众支持家庭作为代理决策者的作用。当死者明确表示同意时,受访者的回答取决于他们是否认为自己是潜在的供体或死者的近亲。答案还取决于死者与家庭中决策者之间的关系,以及他们的种族或文化背景。
公众对家庭在器官捐献决策中的权威的看法需要进一步研究。未来的研究需要一个共同的概念框架和经过验证的设计良好的问卷。这些发现应在制定关于家庭在已故器官捐献中作用的政府政策和指导方针时予以考虑。