• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Emergency department's patient safety culture perceived by healthcare workers: A scoping review protocol.医护人员对急诊科患者安全文化的认知:一项范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0325049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325049. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient-Reported Incident Measure (PRIM) tools for reporting patient safety incidents: protocol for a scoping review.用于报告患者安全事件的患者报告事件测量(PRIM)工具:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 23;15(6):e096983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096983.
3
Engaging Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment in Digital Health Technologies: Protocol for a Scoping Review.让认知障碍老年人参与数字健康技术:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 3;14:e65515. doi: 10.2196/65515.
4
Medical complexity in emergency and urgent care settings: a scoping review protocol.急诊和紧急护理环境中的医疗复杂性:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e086984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086984.
5
Hospital at home digital twin for the management of patients with frailty: a scoping review protocol.用于虚弱患者管理的居家医院数字孪生:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 17;15(6):e093418. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093418.
6
Functional Elements of Entrusted Professional Activities for Dental Educators: Protocol for a Scoping Review.牙科教育工作者委托专业活动的功能要素:范围审查方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 25;14:e74225. doi: 10.2196/74225.
7
Clinical Nurse Educators' Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions: Protocol for a Scoping Review.临床护士教育工作者的工作满意度与离职意向:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 20;14:e66712. doi: 10.2196/66712.
8
Congenital colour vision deficiency in healthcare professionals: a scoping review protocol of the impact on clinical practice and patient safety.医疗保健专业人员的先天性色觉缺陷:对临床实践和患者安全影响的范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e088563. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088563.
9
Influence of religion and spirituality on head and neck cancer patients and their caregivers: a protocol for a scoping review.宗教与精神信仰对头颈癌患者及其照护者的影响:一项范围综述方案
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 28;14(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02768-5.
10
Strategies and Tools for Electronic Health Records and Physician Workflow Alignment: Protocol for a Scoping Review.电子健康记录与医生工作流程协调的策略和工具:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 2;14:e60464. doi: 10.2196/60464.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing the classification accuracy of triage nurses in emergency department: analysis of triage nurses' characteristics.影响急诊科分诊护士分类准确性的因素:分诊护士特征分析
BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 17;23(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02334-9.
2
Patient safety culture in home healthcare centres: protocol for a scoping review.家庭医疗保健中心的患者安全文化:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 5;14(9):e082604. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082604.
3
Status of Patient Safety Culture in Community Pharmacy Settings: A Systematic Review.社区药学环境中的患者安全文化状况:系统评价。
J Patient Saf. 2023 Oct 1;19(6):353-361. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001147.
4
Predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A nursing perspective.沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城患者安全文化的预测因素与结果。护理视角。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jul 3;22(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01391-w.
5
Factors contributing to patient safety during triage process in the emergency department: A systematic review.导致急诊科分诊过程中患者安全的因素:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Sep;32(17-18):5461-5477. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16622. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
6
Patient Safety Culture in Latin American Hospitals: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.拉美医院的患者安全文化:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 3;19(21):14380. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114380.
7
Steps for Conducting a Scoping Review.进行范围综述的步骤。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):565-567. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00621.1.
8
Overcrowding in Emergency Department: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions-A Narrative Review.急诊科过度拥挤:原因、后果及解决方案——一篇叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;10(9):1625. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091625.
9
Methodological quality, guidance, and tools in scoping reviews: a scoping review protocol.综述研究中的方法学质量、指南及工具:一项综述研究方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Apr 1;20(4):1098-1105. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00570.
10
How the hospital context influences nurses' environmentally responsible practice: A focused ethnography.医院环境如何影响护士的环保实践:一项聚焦民族志研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Sep;77(9):3806-3819. doi: 10.1111/jan.14936. Epub 2021 Jun 17.

医护人员对急诊科患者安全文化的认知:一项范围综述方案

Emergency department's patient safety culture perceived by healthcare workers: A scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Kim Min Ji

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0325049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325049. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325049
PMID:40424264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12111689/
Abstract

A strong patient safety culture is critical for ensuring effective healthcare systems, particularly in high-risk environments such as emergency departments. Assessing patient safety culture requires the identification of strengths and weaknesses within clinical departments to enable targeted improvement. Patient safety in emergency departments is especially vulnerable due to overcrowding, necessity for rapid decision-making, and high pressure. However, the existing literature has not been systematically mapped to understand how healthcare workers perceive the patient safety culture in these settings. This scoping review aims to synthesize and map available evidence on patient safety culture as perceived by healthcare workers in emergency departments. This review will be conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology designed explicitly for scoping reviews, and the results will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The inclusion criteria will be based on the Population (healthcare workers), Concept (patient safety culture), and Context (emergency department settings) framework. A comprehensive search will be conducted in PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, KISS, and grey literature sources, such as ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global and Google Scholar. Study selection and data extraction will be performed independently by two researchers, with a third researcher resolving discrepancies. Descriptive analysis will summarize the study characteristics, while content and thematic analyses will identify key themes related to patient safety culture. The findings will be presented at academic conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

摘要

强大的患者安全文化对于确保有效的医疗保健系统至关重要,尤其是在急诊科等高风险环境中。评估患者安全文化需要识别临床科室的优势和劣势,以便进行有针对性的改进。由于过度拥挤、需要快速决策和高压环境,急诊科的患者安全尤其脆弱。然而,现有文献尚未进行系统梳理,以了解医护人员如何看待这些环境中的患者安全文化。本综述旨在综合和梳理关于急诊科医护人员所感知的患者安全文化的现有证据。本综述将按照专门为综述设计的乔安娜·布里格斯研究所方法进行,结果将按照系统评价和Meta分析扩展的范围综述报告规范(PRISMA-ScR)进行报告。纳入标准将基于人群(医护人员)、概念(患者安全文化)和背景(急诊科环境)框架。将在PubMed、CINAHL(EBSCOhost)、科学网、Embase、考科蓝图书馆、KISS以及灰色文献来源(如ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global和谷歌学术)中进行全面搜索。研究选择和数据提取将由两名研究人员独立进行,第三名研究人员解决分歧。描述性分析将总结研究特征,而内容和主题分析将确定与患者安全文化相关的关键主题。研究结果将在学术会议上展示,并发表在同行评审期刊上。