• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导致急诊科分诊过程中患者安全的因素:系统评价。

Factors contributing to patient safety during triage process in the emergency department: A systematic review.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

Emergency Department, University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2023 Sep;32(17-18):5461-5477. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16622. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.16622
PMID:36653922
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Triage is a dynamic environment in which large numbers of people can present. It presents a vulnerable assessment point, as a triage nurse must assess a patient's urgency level and analyse their health status and expected resource needs. Given the critical nature of triage, it is necessary to understand the factors contributing to patient safety.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and examine the factors contributing to patient safety during the triage process.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken, and a thematic analysis of the factors contributing to patient safety during the triage process. PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Sciences, Science Direct, SAGE, EMBASE and reference lists of relevant studies published in English until March 2022 were searched for relevant studies. The search protocol has been registered at the PROSPERO (CRD42019146616), and the review was conducted using the PRISMA criteria.

RESULTS

Out of 5366 records, we included 11 papers for thematic synthesis. Identified factors contributing to patient safety in triage are related to the emergency's work environment, such as patient assessment, high workload, frequent interruptions and staffing, and personal factors such as nurse traits, experience, knowledge, triage fatigue and work schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that patient safety is influenced by the attitude, capabilities and experiences of triage nurses, the time when nurses can dedicate themselves to the patient and triage the patient without disruption. It is necessary to raise awareness among nursing administrators and healthcare professionals to provide a safe triage environment for patients.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review highlights the evidence on the factors contributing to patient safety in the triage process. Further research is needed for this cohort of triage nurses in the emergency department concerning ensuring patient safety.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution was required to design or undertake this review.

摘要

背景

分诊是一个人员众多的动态环境。这是一个脆弱的评估点,因为分诊护士必须评估患者的紧急程度,分析他们的健康状况和预期的资源需求。鉴于分诊的关键性,有必要了解导致患者安全的因素。

目的

确定并研究导致分诊过程中患者安全的因素。

方法

对文献进行系统回顾,并对导致分诊过程中患者安全的因素进行主题分析。检索了 PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Sciences、Science Direct、SAGE、EMBASE 以及截至 2022 年 3 月以英文发表的相关研究的参考文献,以寻找相关研究。检索方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42019146616)上注册,该综述按照 PRISMA 标准进行。

结果

在 5366 条记录中,我们纳入了 11 篇论文进行主题综合。确定的导致分诊中患者安全的因素与急诊工作环境有关,如患者评估、工作量大、频繁中断和人员配备以及护士特质、经验、知识、分诊疲劳和工作安排等个人因素。

结论

本综述表明,患者安全受到分诊护士的态度、能力和经验的影响,护士能够投入时间为患者服务并在不受干扰的情况下对患者进行分诊。有必要提高护理管理人员和医疗保健专业人员的认识,为患者提供安全的分诊环境。

临床相关性

本综述强调了导致分诊过程中患者安全的因素的证据。需要对急诊科的这一组分诊护士进行进一步的研究,以确保患者安全。

患者或公众贡献

设计或进行这项综述不需要患者或公众的参与。

相似文献

1
Factors contributing to patient safety during triage process in the emergency department: A systematic review.导致急诊科分诊过程中患者安全的因素:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Sep;32(17-18):5461-5477. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16622. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.注册护士在养老院的管理和领导经验:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
4
Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care.护士在初级保健中替代医生的角色。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 16;7(7):CD001271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001271.pub3.
5
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare workers' sustainable employability in relation to quality of care: an umbrella review.医护人员的可持续就业能力与医疗质量的关系:一项综合综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 8;15(9):e095126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095126.
2
Healthcare workers' perceptions of patient safety culture in emergency departments: a scoping review.医护人员对急诊科患者安全文化的认知:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e097086. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097086.
3
Emergency department's patient safety culture perceived by healthcare workers: A scoping review protocol.
医护人员对急诊科患者安全文化的认知:一项范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0325049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325049. eCollection 2025.
4
Code Not-So-Blue: Burden and Predictors of Non-urgent Visits to the Surgical Emergency Room in Peshawar, Pakistan.并非“蓝色”代码:巴基斯坦白沙瓦外科急诊室非紧急就诊的负担及预测因素
Cureus. 2025 Apr 25;17(4):e82973. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82973. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Effects of Critical Thinking Disposition, Clinical Judgement, and Nurse-Physician Collaboration on Triage Competency Among Triage Nurses.批判性思维倾向、临床判断及医护协作对分诊护士分诊能力的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 13;13(4):405. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040405.
6
Root causes behind patient safety incidents in the emergency department and suggestions for improving patient safety - an analysis in a Finnish teaching hospital.急诊科患者安全事件的根本原因及改善患者安全的建议——芬兰教学医院的分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 7;24(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01120-9.
7
Nurses' Perception on the Hindrances of Triage System in Emergency Unit.护士对急诊科分诊系统障碍的认知
Nurs Res Pract. 2024 Oct 25;2024:8621065. doi: 10.1155/2024/8621065. eCollection 2024.
8
Factors influencing the classification accuracy of triage nurses in emergency department: analysis of triage nurses' characteristics.影响急诊科分诊护士分类准确性的因素:分诊护士特征分析
BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 17;23(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02334-9.
9
Activity, triage levels and impact of the pandemic on hospital emergency departments: A multicentre cross-sectional study.疫情对医院急诊科的活动、分诊级别及影响:一项多中心横断面研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Mar;81(3):1332-1342. doi: 10.1111/jan.16332. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
10
Triage Performance Across Large Language Models, ChatGPT, and Untrained Doctors in Emergency Medicine: Comparative Study.分诊表现比较:大型语言模型、ChatGPT 和未经训练的急诊医生:一项对比研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 14;26:e53297. doi: 10.2196/53297.