• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗难治性良性食管狭窄的可生物降解支架:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Biodegradable Stents for the Treatment of Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Tyč Daniel, Vaněčková Nina, Hanuš Josef, Selke Krulichová Iva

机构信息

Department of Medical Biophysics, Charles University - Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czechia.

ELLA-CS, s.r.o., Hradec Kralove, Czechia.

出版信息

Digestion. 2025 May 27:1-12. doi: 10.1159/000546377.

DOI:10.1159/000546377
PMID:40425006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12215169/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Refractory benign esophageal strictures (RBES) pose significant clinical challenges. Biodegradable (BD) stents have emerged as alternatives to traditional stenting methods, offering the possibility of reducing the need for multiple procedures. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BD stents in the treatment of RBES.

METHODS

The PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Science Direct databases were searched according to the PRISMA statement. Studies that focused on the clinical outcomes of BD stents used in adult patients with RBES were included. Data on technical success and complication rates were analyzed using random-effects models. Efficacy data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The review included 15 studies with 241 BD stent implantations. The technical success rates were consistently high in all studies. The median time to restenosis was 21 weeks, with survival rates of 38.4% at 26 weeks and 27.0% at 52 weeks. The rate of complications requiring intervention was relatively low, but significant hyperplasia and pain occurred in 16.4% and 8.8% of the cases, respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed in hyperplasia-related outcomes, which required a detailed subgroup analysis to investigate the underlying causes.

CONCLUSION

BD stents provide acceptable results in terms of efficacy and safety for the treatment of RBES. However, the evidence is limited owing to the lack of randomized controlled trials and comparative studies. Future research should focus on these areas to strengthen the clinical evidence regarding BD stents.

摘要

引言

难治性良性食管狭窄(RBES)带来了重大的临床挑战。可生物降解(BD)支架已成为传统支架置入方法的替代方案,为减少多次手术的需求提供了可能。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估BD支架治疗RBES的疗效和安全性。

方法

根据PRISMA声明检索PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane和Science Direct数据库。纳入关注BD支架在成年RBES患者中临床结局的研究。使用随机效应模型分析技术成功率和并发症发生率数据。使用Kaplan-Meier分析方法分析疗效数据。

结果

该评价纳入了15项研究,共241例BD支架植入病例。所有研究的技术成功率均持续较高。再狭窄的中位时间为21周,26周时生存率为38.4%,52周时为27.0%。需要干预的并发症发生率相对较低,但分别有16.4%和8.8%的病例出现明显增生和疼痛。在增生相关结局方面观察到显著的异质性,这需要进行详细的亚组分析以探究潜在原因。

结论

BD支架在治疗RBES的疗效和安全性方面提供了可接受的结果。然而,由于缺乏随机对照试验和比较研究,证据有限。未来的研究应聚焦于这些领域,以加强关于BD支架的临床证据。

相似文献

1
Biodegradable Stents for the Treatment of Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.用于治疗难治性良性食管狭窄的可生物降解支架:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Digestion. 2025 May 27:1-12. doi: 10.1159/000546377.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
5
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
Pivotal trial of a biodegradable stent for patients with refractory benign esophageal stricture.治疗难治性良性食管狭窄患者的可生物降解支架的关键试验。
Esophagus. 2022 Jul;19(3):516-524. doi: 10.1007/s10388-022-00909-6. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Esophageal stenting for benign and malignant disease: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021.良性和恶性疾病的食管支架置入术:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南-2021 更新。
Endoscopy. 2021 Jul;53(7):751-762. doi: 10.1055/a-1475-0063. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Oesophageal stents for the treatment of radiation and anastomotic oesophageal strictures.用于治疗放射性和吻合口食管狭窄的食管支架
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2018 Jul-Sep;81(3):361-365.
5
Dilation or biodegradable stent placement for recurrent benign esophageal strictures: a randomized controlled trial.扩张或可生物降解支架置入治疗复发性良性食管狭窄:一项随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2018 Dec;50(12):1146-1155. doi: 10.1055/a-0602-4169. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
6
Endoscopically placed stents: a useful alternative for the management of refractory benign cervical esophageal stenosis.内镜下放置支架:治疗难治性良性颈段食管狭窄的一种有效替代方法。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2017 Jul;109(7):510-515. doi: 10.17235/reed.2017.4795/2016.
7
Biodegradable Stents for Caustic Esophageal Strictures: Do They Work?用于腐蚀性食管狭窄的可生物降解支架:它们有效吗?
Dysphagia. 2017 Aug;32(4):575-582. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9800-8. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
8
Prospective trial of biodegradable stents for refractory benign esophageal strictures after curative treatment of esophageal cancer.前瞻性研究可生物降解支架治疗食管癌根治性治疗后难治性良性食管狭窄。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Sep;86(3):492-499. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
9
Biodegradable esophageal stents in benign and malignant strictures - a single center experience.生物可降解食管支架治疗良恶性狭窄——单中心经验
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Jun;4(6):E618-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-105433. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
10
Clinical outcomes following stent placement in refractory benign esophageal stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.难治性良性食管狭窄支架置入后的临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endoscopy. 2016 Feb;48(2):141-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393331. Epub 2015 Nov 3.