Sperber Christoph, Rosenzopf Hannah, Wawrzyniak Max, Klingbeil Julian, Saur Dorothee, Karnath Hans-Otto
Center of Neurology, Division of Neuropsychology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Neurology, Neuroimaging Laboratory, University of Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 27;15(1):18544. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01703-x.
Spatial neglect is commonly attributed to lesions of a predominantly right-hemispheric cortical network. Although spatial neglect was also repeatedly observed after lesions to the basal ganglia and the thalamus, many anatomical network models omit these structures. We investigated if disruption of functional or structural connectivity can explain spatial neglect in subcortical stroke. We retrospectively investigated data of first-ever, acute stroke patients with right-sided lesions of the basal ganglia (n = 27) or the thalamus (n = 16). Based on lesion location, we estimated (i) functional connectivity via lesion-network mapping with normative resting state fMRI data, (ii) structural white matter disconnection using a white matter atlas and (iii) tract-wise disconnection of association fibres based on normative tractography data to investigate the association of spatial neglect and disconnection measures. Apart from very small clusters of functional disconnection observed in inferior/middle frontal regions in lesion-network symptom mapping for basal ganglia lesions, our analyses found no evidence of functional or structural subcortico-cortical disconnection. Instead, the multivariate consideration of lesion load to several association fibres predicted the occurrence of spatial neglect (p = 0.0048; AUC = 0.76), which were the superior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior occipitofrontal fasciculus, superior occipitofrontal fasciculus, and the uncinate fasciculus. Disconnection of long (cortico-cortical) association fibres can explain spatial neglect in subcortical stroke. Like the competing theory of remote cortical hypoperfusion, our finding does not support a genuine role for subcortical grey matter structures in spatial neglect.
空间忽视通常被认为是主要由右侧半球皮质网络损伤所致。尽管在基底神经节和丘脑损伤后也反复观察到空间忽视,但许多解剖网络模型都忽略了这些结构。我们研究了功能或结构连接的中断是否能解释皮质下卒中后的空间忽视。我们回顾性研究了首次发生急性卒中且基底神经节右侧损伤(n = 27)或丘脑右侧损伤(n = 16)患者的数据。基于损伤位置,我们通过使用标准静息态功能磁共振成像数据的损伤网络映射来估计(i)功能连接性,(ii)使用白质图谱估计结构性白质离断,以及(iii)基于标准纤维束成像数据估计联合纤维的逐束离断,以研究空间忽视与离断测量之间的关联。除了在基底神经节损伤的损伤网络症状映射中,在下额叶/中额叶区域观察到非常小的功能离断簇外,我们的分析没有发现功能或结构皮质下 - 皮质离断的证据。相反,对多条联合纤维损伤负荷的多变量考量预测了空间忽视的发生(p = 0.0048;AUC = 0.76),这些纤维是上纵束、下枕额束、上枕额束和钩束。长(皮质 - 皮质)联合纤维的离断可以解释皮质下卒中后的空间忽视。与远程皮质灌注不足的竞争理论一样,我们的发现不支持皮质下灰质结构在空间忽视中具有真正作用的观点。