Gong Tian, Yu Jia Li, Yang Hua, Tang Yu Fan, Huang Ao, Wang Yuan Xia
Department of Nursing, Second Clinical Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong, 637000, USA.
Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University Nanchong Hospital Nanchong Central Hospital, Nanchong, 637000, USA.
BMC Pediatr. 2025 May 27;25(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05700-x.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the incidence of nasal injury in preterm infants undergoing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy using nasal masks versus nasal prongs, and to explore the potential effects of prophylactic use of hydrocolloid dressings in reducing nasal injury in preterm infants.
On March 1, 2025, we searched the Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases for measures and strategies to prevent nasal injury in preterm infants undergoing positive pressure ventilation, and collected relevant randomized controlled trials. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias in the literature, and the modified Jadad score was used to assess the quality of the studies. Key information was extracted, including the characteristics of the study subjects, interventions, incidence and severity of nasal injury, and failure rate of positive pressure ventilation.
A total of 12 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 1 low-quality study and 11 high-quality studies, with a total sample size of 1,271 participants. Eight studies compared the effects of nasal prongs and nasal masks, with 3 studies investigating the effects of alternating use of nasal prongs and masks. Four studies used hydrocolloid dressings. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the overall incidence of nasal injury was 0.62 (95% CI 0.45-0.87, P = 0.006) in the nasal mask group, 0.95 (95% CI 0.27-3.29, P = 0.093) in the alternating use group, and 0.40 (95% CI 0.30-0.53, P < 0.0001) in the hydrocolloid dressing group.
The incidence of nasal injury was lower in the nasal mask group compared to the nasal prong group. However, the effect of alternating use of nasal masks and prongs on reducing the incidence of nasal injury was not significant. Prophylactic use of hydrocolloid dressings had a significant effect on reducing the incidence of nasal injury in preterm infants. However, the limited number of existing studies and the small sample sizes of the included studies restricted the generalizability of the conclusions. Future research should further optimize the standardization of interventions and conduct multicenter, large-sample randomized controlled trials to promote continuous improvement in clinical nursing practice.
进行一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较使用鼻面罩与鼻导管进行持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗的早产儿鼻损伤的发生率,并探讨预防性使用水胶体敷料对降低早产儿鼻损伤的潜在效果。
2025年3月1日,我们在Web of Science、PubMed、Cochrane和Embase数据库中搜索预防接受正压通气的早产儿鼻损伤的措施和策略,并收集相关随机对照试验。使用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具评估文献中的偏倚风险,使用改良的Jadad评分评估研究质量。提取关键信息,包括研究对象的特征、干预措施、鼻损伤的发生率和严重程度以及正压通气的失败率。
共有12项研究符合纳入和排除标准,包括1项低质量研究和11项高质量研究,总样本量为1271名参与者。8项研究比较了鼻导管和鼻面罩的效果,3项研究调查了交替使用鼻导管和面罩的效果。4项研究使用了水胶体敷料。荟萃分析结果显示,鼻面罩组鼻损伤的总体发生率为0.62(95%CI 0.45 - 0.87,P = 0.006),交替使用组为0.95(95%CI 0.27 - 3.29,P = 0.093),水胶体敷料组为0.40(95%CI 0.30 - 0.53,P < 0.0001)。
与鼻导管组相比,鼻面罩组鼻损伤的发生率较低。然而,交替使用鼻面罩和鼻导管对降低鼻损伤发生率的效果不显著。预防性使用水胶体敷料对降低早产儿鼻损伤的发生率有显著效果。然而,现有研究数量有限且纳入研究的样本量较小,限制了结论的普遍性。未来的研究应进一步优化干预措施的标准化,并开展多中心、大样本随机对照试验,以促进临床护理实践的持续改进。