Suppr超能文献

酒精滥用:整合人格特质与决策风格进行剖析

Alcohol Misuse: Integrating Personality Traits and Decision-Making Styles for Profiling.

作者信息

García Luis F, Cuevas Lara, García Oscar, Balada Ferran, Aluja Anton

机构信息

Department Psicología Biológica y de la Salud, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.

Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research, Dr. Pifarré Foundation, 25198 Lleida, Spain.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 2;15(5):622. doi: 10.3390/bs15050622.

Abstract

The literature has described how different and independent personality profiles (pathways or motives) lead to the same outcome: alcohol misuse. In addition, decision-making styles could also play a role in understanding alcohol misuse better, although the evidence is much more scarce compared to personality traits. The present paper aims to test how personality traits and decision-making styles could be integrated to better understand different pathways/profiles of alcohol misuse. Measures of alcohol misuse (AUDIT and RAPI), structural personality models (ZKA-PQ/SF), impulsivity (BIS-11 and UPPS-P), and decision-making styles (GDMS) were applied to a sample of 988 individuals from the Spanish general population (446 of them also completed the NEO-PI-R). Exploratory factor analyses support the identification of different pathways to alcohol misuse, and regression analyses suggest that decision-making styles add little variance to personality traits to account for differences in alcohol misuse, although the spontaneous style is consistently associated with alcohol misuse. The conclusions highlight the need to consider different aetiologies of alcohol misuse, especially an antisocial/disinhibited profile, and claim for the assessment of decision-making styles and, especially, personality traits to facilitate more successful treatment and prevention programs for alcohol misuse.

摘要

文献描述了不同且独立的人格特征(路径或动机)如何导致相同的结果:酒精滥用。此外,决策风格在更好地理解酒精滥用方面也可能发挥作用,尽管与人格特质相比,相关证据要少得多。本文旨在测试人格特质和决策风格如何整合,以更好地理解酒精滥用的不同路径/特征。对来自西班牙普通人群的988名个体应用了酒精滥用测量工具(AUDIT和RAPI)、结构化人格模型(ZKA-PQ/SF)、冲动性测量工具(BIS-11和UPPS-P)以及决策风格测量工具(GDMS)(其中446人还完成了NEO-PI-R)。探索性因素分析支持识别出酒精滥用的不同路径,回归分析表明,决策风格对解释酒精滥用差异的人格特质方差贡献不大,尽管自发风格始终与酒精滥用相关。结论强调需要考虑酒精滥用的不同病因,尤其是反社会/抑制不足型特征,并主张评估决策风格,特别是人格特质,以促进更成功的酒精滥用治疗和预防项目。

相似文献

1
Alcohol Misuse: Integrating Personality Traits and Decision-Making Styles for Profiling.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 2;15(5):622. doi: 10.3390/bs15050622.
2
Testing the four-factor model of personality vulnerability to alcohol misuse: a three-wave, one-year longitudinal study.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Dec;28(4):1000-12. doi: 10.1037/a0037244. Epub 2014 Aug 18.

本文引用的文献

1
The Alternative Model of Personality Disorders: Assessment, Convergent and Discriminant Validity, and a Look to the Future.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2024 Jul;20(1):431-455. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081122-010709. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
3
Emotional (in)stability: Neuroticism is associated with increased variability in negative emotion after all.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 6;120(23):e2212154120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212154120. Epub 2023 May 30.
4
Personality traits and alcohol consumption: Secondary analysis of the Self-Match Study.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Jun;46(6):1110-1120. doi: 10.1111/acer.14841. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
Decision Making and Alcohol: Health Policy Implications.
Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Mar 1;6(1):64-71. doi: 10.1177/2372732218818587. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
7
Type I and Type II Alcoholism: An Update.
Alcohol Health Res World. 1996;20(1):18-23.
8
Impulsivity in Gambling Disorder and problem gambling: a meta-analysis.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Jul;44(8):1354-1361. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0393-9. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验