• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情境危险评估任务主观决策中的前额叶氧合作用:人格特质与决策风格的影响

Prefrontal Oxygenation in a Subjective Decision on a Situational Danger Assessment Task: Personality Traits and Decision-Making Styles Involvement.

作者信息

Balada Ferran, Aymamí Neus, García Óscar, García Luis F, Aluja Anton

机构信息

Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research, Dr. Pifarré Foundation, 25198 Lleida, Spain.

Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 9;15(5):647. doi: 10.3390/bs15050647.

DOI:10.3390/bs15050647
PMID:40426425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12109266/
Abstract

This study investigated prefrontal cortex activity during the viewing and evaluation of pictures depicting scenarios with varying levels of danger, with a focus on the modulatory effects of personality traits and decision-making styles. The study sample included 120 male participants (44.4 ± 12.9 years) and 87 female participants (38.9 ± 10.5 years). Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure prefrontal oxygenation during the period of looking at pictures and the subsequent period of judging how dangerous they looked. Psychometric assessments included the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ) and the Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire (MDMQ). The results revealed significant time-by-region ( = 2.9, = 0.013) and danger level by region interactions ( = 2.8, = 0.021) during the viewing period. During the evaluation period, a significant time-by-region interaction was observed ( = 8.7, < 0.001). High sensation seekers exhibited reduced oxygenation levels in specific right prefrontal regions, reflecting a differential neural response to varying danger levels. Similarly, individuals with higher Aggressiveness and Extraversion displayed distinct oxygenation patterns during the evaluation phase, suggesting that personality traits influence prefrontal activity. However, no significant effects of decision-making styles were detected in either phase. These findings emphasise the pivotal role of the prefrontal cortex in assessing scene safety and highlight how neural responses are modulated by personality traits, rather than by decision-making styles.

摘要

本研究调查了在观看和评估描绘不同危险程度场景的图片时前额叶皮层的活动,重点关注人格特质和决策风格的调节作用。研究样本包括120名男性参与者(44.4±12.9岁)和87名女性参与者(38.9±10.5岁)。功能性近红外光谱技术(fNIRS)用于测量观看图片期间以及随后判断图片危险程度期间的前额叶氧合情况。心理测量评估包括祖克曼-库尔曼-阿卢亚人格问卷(ZKA-PQ)和墨尔本决策问卷(MDMQ)。结果显示,在观看期间存在显著的时间×区域交互作用(F = 2.9,p = 0.013)以及危险程度×区域交互作用(F = 2.8,p = 0.021)。在评估期间,观察到显著的时间×区域交互作用(F = 8.7,p < 0.001)。高感觉寻求者在右侧特定前额叶区域的氧合水平降低,这反映了对不同危险程度的差异性神经反应。同样,具有较高攻击性和外向性的个体在评估阶段表现出独特的氧合模式,表明人格特质会影响前额叶活动。然而,在两个阶段均未检测到决策风格的显著影响。这些发现强调了前额叶皮层在评估场景安全性中的关键作用,并突出了神经反应是如何由人格特质而非决策风格调节的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5676/12109266/08f4b2679949/behavsci-15-00647-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5676/12109266/02a778887d9e/behavsci-15-00647-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5676/12109266/f2be79c5e0db/behavsci-15-00647-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5676/12109266/7c93b4d21063/behavsci-15-00647-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5676/12109266/08f4b2679949/behavsci-15-00647-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5676/12109266/02a778887d9e/behavsci-15-00647-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5676/12109266/f2be79c5e0db/behavsci-15-00647-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5676/12109266/7c93b4d21063/behavsci-15-00647-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5676/12109266/08f4b2679949/behavsci-15-00647-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Prefrontal Oxygenation in a Subjective Decision on a Situational Danger Assessment Task: Personality Traits and Decision-Making Styles Involvement.情境危险评估任务主观决策中的前额叶氧合作用:人格特质与决策风格的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 9;15(5):647. doi: 10.3390/bs15050647.
2
Short form of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire: Its trait and facet relationships with personality disorder functioning styles in Chinese general and clinical samples.《Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷短式简表中文版:在中国一般人群和临床样本中与人格障碍功能紊乱模式的特质和因子关系》
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Jan;271:438-445. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.028. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
3
The psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja personality questionnaire.祖克曼-库尔曼-阿卢亚人格问卷泰语版的心理测量特性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):2511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85824-3.
4
Uncovering the neural basis of risk preferences in cooperative Dyads: A fNIRS study.揭示合作二元组中风险偏好的神经基础:一项近红外光谱研究。
Neuroimage. 2025 Apr 15;310:121167. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121167. Epub 2025 Mar 23.
5
Decision-Making and the Alternative Five Factor Personality Model: Exploring the Role of Personality Traits, Age, Sex and Social Position.决策与替代性五因素人格模型:探索人格特质、年龄、性别和社会地位的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 27;12:717705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717705. eCollection 2021.
6
Structural analysis of the facets and domains of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ) and the NEO PI-R.对 Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷(ZKA-PQ)和 NEO PI-R 的面和域进行结构分析。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(2):156-63. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.645935.
7
Locating the Dark Triad in a Multidimensional Personality Space.在多维人格空间中定位暗黑三因素。
Span J Psychol. 2022 Mar 24;25:e14. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2022.11.
8
Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ) and Cloninger's Temperament and Character Inventory Revised (TCI-R): a comparative study.祖克曼-库尔曼-阿卢亚人格问卷 (ZKA-PQ) 和克隆宁格气质与性格量表修订版 (TCI-R):一项比较研究。
Scand J Psychol. 2012 Jun;53(3):247-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00943.x. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
9
Alcohol Misuse: Integrating Personality Traits and Decision-Making Styles for Profiling.酒精滥用:整合人格特质与决策风格进行剖析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 2;15(5):622. doi: 10.3390/bs15050622.
10
Relationship between Personality Traits and the Inner Strengths.人格特质与内在力量的关系。
Psychiatr Danub. 2021 Spring-Summer;33(Suppl 4):844-849.

本文引用的文献

1
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays causal role in probability weighting during risky choice.背外侧前额叶皮层在风险选择中的概率加权中起因果作用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 27;12(1):16115. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18529-6.
2
Medial and orbital frontal cortex in decision-making and flexible behavior.决策和灵活行为中的额中回和眶额皮层。
Neuron. 2022 Sep 7;110(17):2743-2770. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.05.022. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
3
Use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy to evaluate cognitive change when using healthcare simulation tools.
使用功能性近红外光谱技术评估使用医疗模拟工具时的认知变化。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Nov 1;6(6):360-364. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000517. eCollection 2020.
4
Lesions in different prefrontal sectors are associated with different types of acquired personality disturbances.不同前额叶区域的损伤与不同类型的获得性人格障碍有关。
Cortex. 2022 Feb;147:169-184. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
5
Risk-taking in humans and the medial orbitofrontal cortex reward system.人类的冒险行为与内侧眶额皮质奖励系统。
Neuroimage. 2022 Apr 1;249:118893. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118893. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
6
Decision-Making and the Alternative Five Factor Personality Model: Exploring the Role of Personality Traits, Age, Sex and Social Position.决策与替代性五因素人格模型:探索人格特质、年龄、性别和社会地位的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 27;12:717705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717705. eCollection 2021.
7
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex on risk-taking behavior.前额叶皮层经颅直流电刺激对冒险行为的影响。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Sep;74(9):455-465. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13025. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
8
Personality traits, emotional intelligence and decision-making styles in Lebanese universities medical students.黎巴嫩大学医学生的人格特质、情绪智力和决策风格。
BMC Psychol. 2020 May 5;8(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00406-4.
9
Risk proneness modulates the impact of impulsivity on brain functional connectivity.风险倾向调节冲动性对大脑功能连接的影响。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Mar;41(4):943-951. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24851. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
10
The effect of emotion regulation on risk-taking and decision-related activity in prefrontal cortex.情绪调节对前额叶皮层风险决策相关活动的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Oct 1;14(10):1109-1118. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz078.