Sedlár Martin, Gurňáková Jitka
Institute of Experimental Psychology of the Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences.
J Psychol. 2025;159(2):71-91. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2024.2369618. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
Intuitive and deliberative styles can be considered the best-known decision-making styles, which are thought to be linked to actual workplace performance. However, there is a limited research on individual differences in these styles among individuals who provide healthcare. Therefore, adopting the self-report approach, this study examines the roles of the Big Five personality traits and socio-emotional intelligence factors in intuitive and deliberative decision-making styles among medical students and healthcare professionals. The research sample consists of 203 participants (50 medical students, 153 healthcare professionals) who completed the Big Five Inventory, the Trait Meta-Mood Scale, the Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, and the Preference for Intuition and Deliberation Scale. The regression analyses revealed that attention to one's emotions and social information processing were positively related to intuitive decision-making style, while the clarity of one's emotions and social awareness were negatively related to intuitive decision-making style. It was further shown that conscientiousness, neuroticism, repair of one's emotions, and social information processing were positively related to deliberative decision-making style. The findings highlight the importance of personality and socio-emotional intelligence in understanding decision-making. Specifically, they point out that Big Five personality traits better explain deliberative style, while socio-emotional intelligence factors better explain intuitive style.
直觉型和深思熟虑型决策风格可被视为最为人熟知的决策风格,人们认为它们与实际工作场所的表现相关。然而,对于提供医疗服务的个体在这些风格上的个体差异,研究却很有限。因此,本研究采用自我报告法,考察大五人格特质和社会情绪智力因素在医学生和医疗专业人员的直觉型和深思熟虑型决策风格中的作用。研究样本包括203名参与者(50名医学生,153名医疗专业人员),他们完成了大五人格量表、特质元情绪量表、特罗姆瑟社会智力量表以及直觉与深思熟虑偏好量表。回归分析显示,对自身情绪的关注和社会信息处理与直觉型决策风格呈正相关,而自身情绪的清晰度和社会意识与直觉型决策风格呈负相关。进一步研究表明,尽责性、神经质、情绪修复和社会信息处理与深思熟虑型决策风格呈正相关。研究结果凸显了人格和社会情绪智力在理解决策过程中的重要性。具体而言,它们指出大五人格特质能更好地解释深思熟虑型风格,而社会情绪智力因素能更好地解释直觉型风格。