• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

价值观内化量表的编制与验证

Development and Validation of the Values Internalization Scale.

作者信息

Wu Lanting, Chen Youguo, Huang Xiting

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

Research Center for Psychology and Social Development, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 12;15(5):660. doi: 10.3390/bs15050660.

DOI:10.3390/bs15050660
PMID:40426437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12109008/
Abstract

Clarifying the stages of the values internalization process enables a more effective selection of interventions to promote targeted internalization. However, no specialized instrument currently exists to measure this process. Grounded in the four-stage model of values internalization, this study aimed to develop and validate a Values Internalization Scale (VIS) for adults. Data from Sample 1 ( = 474) were subjected to item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, yielding a scale with a four-factor structure. Subsequently, confirmatory factor analysis and reliability and validity tests were conducted using Sample 2 ( = 470). The results indicated that the four-factor model demonstrated a good model fit and that the scale exhibited satisfactory internal consistency reliability, criterion-related validity, and test-retest reliability. The final 25-item VIS comprises four dimensions: ignoring-resistance, understanding, attempt to practice, and integration stages. The 25-item VIS developed in this study performed exceptionally well regarding reliability and validity and can be utilized in subsequent research on the internalization of values.

摘要

明确价值观内化过程的阶段有助于更有效地选择干预措施,以促进目标内化。然而,目前尚无专门的工具来测量这一过程。基于价值观内化的四阶段模型,本研究旨在开发并验证一种适用于成年人的价值观内化量表(VIS)。对样本1(n = 474)的数据进行项目分析和探索性因素分析,得出一个具有四因素结构的量表。随后,使用样本2(n = 470)进行验证性因素分析以及信效度检验。结果表明,四因素模型具有良好的模型拟合度,该量表表现出令人满意的内部一致性信度、效标关联效度和重测信度。最终的25项VIS量表包括四个维度:忽视-抗拒、理解、尝试践行和整合阶段。本研究开发的25项VIS量表在信效度方面表现出色,可用于后续关于价值观内化的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f905/12109008/e78acbf4dd5c/behavsci-15-00660-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f905/12109008/4d7dcecbd3c7/behavsci-15-00660-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f905/12109008/2dcd7be08682/behavsci-15-00660-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f905/12109008/e78acbf4dd5c/behavsci-15-00660-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f905/12109008/4d7dcecbd3c7/behavsci-15-00660-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f905/12109008/2dcd7be08682/behavsci-15-00660-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f905/12109008/e78acbf4dd5c/behavsci-15-00660-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Values Internalization Scale.价值观内化量表的编制与验证
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 12;15(5):660. doi: 10.3390/bs15050660.
2
The Chinese Version of the DigiHealthCom (Digital Health Competence) Instrument for Assessing Digital Health Competence of Health Care Professionals: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study.用于评估医疗保健专业人员数字健康能力的DigiHealthCom(数字健康能力)工具中文版:翻译、改编与验证研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 21;12:e65373. doi: 10.2196/65373.
3
Digital Health Literacy Questionnaire for Older Adults: Instrument Development and Validation Study.老年人数字健康素养问卷:工具开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 19;27:e64193. doi: 10.2196/64193.
4
Development and validation of the nurses' touch comfort evaluation scale in China.中国护士触摸舒适度评估量表的研制与验证
BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 14;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02804-8.
5
A new health literacy scale for staff in preschool childcare institution: development and preliminary validation.一种针对学前儿童保育机构工作人员的新健康素养量表:编制与初步验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21233-x.
6
Patient Self-Management Scale After Total Knee Arthroplasty (PSMS-TKA): Instrument Development and Cross-Sectional Validation Study.全膝关节置换术后患者自我管理量表(PSMS-TKA):量表编制及横断面验证研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Dec;39(12):2977-2985. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.082. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
7
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Nursing Teacher Emotional Labor Scale.护理教师情绪劳动量表的编制与心理测量学评价
BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 20;24(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02832-4.
8
A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation.一个新的综合性糖尿病健康素养量表:编制与心理测量学评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Development and validation of the pain management competency scale for nurses and a nationwide survey of Chinese nurses.护士疼痛管理能力量表的编制与验证及中国护士全国性调查
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 27;24(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02733-6.
10
Development and validation of the family management scale for children with asthma (FMSCA).儿童哮喘家庭管理量表(FMSCA)的编制与验证
J Asthma. 2020 Apr;57(4):441-451. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1571085. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Are values stable throughout adulthood? Evidence from two German long-term panel studies.价值观在成年期是否稳定?来自两项德国长期面板研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0289487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289487. eCollection 2023.
2
A new understanding of the cognitive reappraisal technique: an extension based on the schema theory.对认知重评技术的新理解:基于图式理论的拓展
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Apr 17;17:1174585. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1174585. eCollection 2023.
3
Changing Personal Values through Value-Manipulation Tasks: A Systematic Literature Review Based on Schwartz's Theory of Basic Human Values.
通过价值操纵任务改变个人价值观:基于施瓦茨基本人类价值观理论的系统文献综述
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Jun 28;12(7):692-715. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12070052.
4
Parenting Styles, Internalization of Values and Self-Esteem: A Cross-Cultural Study in Spain, Portugal and Brazil.教养方式、价值观内化与自尊:西班牙、葡萄牙和巴西的跨文化研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):2370. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072370.
5
Antecedents of environmental management system internalization: Assessing managerial interpretations and cognitive framings of sustainability issues.环境管理体系内化的前因:评估管理者对可持续性问题的解释和认知框架。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 1;247:804-815. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.106. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
6
Testing and Extending Schwartz Refined Value Theory Using a Best-Worst Scaling Approach.采用最佳最差标度法检验和扩展施瓦茨精细化价值理论。
Assessment. 2019 Mar;26(2):166-180. doi: 10.1177/1073191116683799. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
7
Value development during adolescence: Dimensions of change and stability.青少年时期的价值观发展:变化和稳定的维度。
J Pers. 2019 Jun;87(3):620-632. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12420. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
8
The third wave of cognitive behavioral therapy and the rise of process-based care.认知行为疗法的第三次浪潮与基于过程的护理的兴起。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;16(3):245-246. doi: 10.1002/wps.20442.
9
Socially Desirable Responding in Web-Based Questionnaires: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Candor Hypothesis.基于网络问卷的社会赞许性反应:坦诚假设的元分析综述。
Assessment. 2017 Sep;24(6):746-762. doi: 10.1177/1073191115624547. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
10
Rebels with a cause? Adolescent defiance from the perspective of reactance theory and self-determination theory.有原因的叛逆者?从逆反理论和自我决定理论看青少年的反抗行为。
Child Dev. 2015 May-Jun;86(3):903-18. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12355. Epub 2015 Feb 23.