Cheng Cheng, Chen Xiao, Wang Junqiao, Christensen Martin
School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China.
School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 21;15(5):707. doi: 10.3390/bs15050707.
Polypharmacy is an increasing concern in healthcare due to its potential to cause adverse drug reactions and medication non-adherence. The evidence has identified a connection between psychological distress and polypharmacy, yet there is a lack of validated instruments to measure this specific type of distress. This study aims to develop and validate the Polypharmacy-related Psychological Distress Scale. This study followed a rigorous scale development procedure, encompassing item creation, scale development, and scale evaluation. A multi-method design incorporated a literature review, the Delphi method with eight experts, and a cross-sectional survey with 97 participants. A comprehensive range of psychometric tests, including content validity, face validity, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and construct validity, were utilized to assess the goodness of the instrument-the finalized scale comprised four items. Content validity results were deemed satisfactory based on CVI for item (I-CVI) and CVI for scale (S-CVI). Face validity was established through the incorporation of participant feedback. A significant correlation was found between the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 and the Polypharmacy-related Psychological Distress Scale, with a correlation coefficient of 0.444 ( < 0.001). The scale demonstrated acceptable reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.790 and a McDonald's omega of 0.937. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed a unidimensional structure. To summarize, the Polypharmacy-related Psychological Distress Scale showed satisfactory reliability and validity in this preliminary study. It holds promise for use by healthcare professionals to assess psychological distress in the target population, pending further validation.
由于多重用药可能导致药物不良反应和用药依从性差,它在医疗保健领域日益受到关注。有证据表明心理困扰与多重用药之间存在联系,但缺乏用于测量这种特定类型困扰的有效工具。本研究旨在开发并验证多重用药相关心理困扰量表。本研究遵循了严格的量表开发程序,包括项目创建、量表开发和量表评估。多方法设计纳入了文献综述、与八位专家进行的德尔菲法以及对97名参与者的横断面调查。运用了一系列全面的心理测量测试,包括内容效度、表面效度、同时效度、内部一致性和结构效度,以评估该工具的优劣——最终确定的量表包含四个项目。基于项目的内容效度指数(I-CVI)和量表的内容效度指数(S-CVI),内容效度结果被认为是令人满意的。通过纳入参与者的反馈确定了表面效度。患者健康问卷-4与多重用药相关心理困扰量表之间存在显著相关性,相关系数为0.444(<0.001)。该量表显示出可接受的信度,克朗巴哈系数为0.790,麦克唐纳ω系数为0.937。验证性因素分析揭示了单维结构。总之,在这项初步研究中,多重用药相关心理困扰量表显示出令人满意的信度和效度。在进一步验证之前,它有望供医疗保健专业人员用于评估目标人群的心理困扰。