Khouja Bashayer A, Mathias Hina, Joshi Mayura, Fay Megan L, Korade Supriya, Wong Catherine W Y, Stewart Diana S, Zhou Xinyi, Zhang Wei, Salazar Joelle K
Division of Food Processing Science and Technology, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Bedford Park, IL 60501, USA.
Illinois Institute of Technology, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Bedford Park, IL 60501, USA.
Foods. 2025 May 14;14(10):1744. doi: 10.3390/foods14101744.
Fresh produce, such as peaches and apples, are agricultural commodities, making them susceptible to contamination by foodborne pathogens such as and . Traditional methods, such as chlorine washes, have limitations related to antimicrobial efficacy, prompting interest in alternative techniques, such as power ultrasound. This study evaluated the use of power ultrasound, alone and combined with organic acids (citric, lactic, and malic), to reduce pathogen populations on whole apples and peaches. Pathogen cocktails of and were spot-inoculated on fruit surfaces at an initial population level of 8-9 log CFU/fruit. The fruits were then submerged in water or citric, malic, or lactic acid at concentrations of 1%, 2%, or 5% alone or with power ultrasound treatment at 40 kHz for 2, 5, or 10 min. Results revealed that treatment conditions on apples exhibited significantly greater pathogen reduction than on peaches, likely due to the smoother surface topology on apples compared to the rougher, trichome-covered peach surfaces. Between the two pathogens, exhibited significantly greater resistance to treatments, resulting in maximum reductions of approximately 4 log CFU/fruit. In contrast, treatments were more effective against as lactic acid alone reduced populations by >6 log CFU/fruit. Malic acid was the second-most effective organic acid against Synergistic antimicrobial effects were observed when organic acids were used in combination with power ultrasound. For instance, an additional reduction of 2-3 log CFU/fruit was achieved for compared to the use of organic acid treatments alone. These findings support the use of organic acid and power ultrasound in hurdle as an effective strategy to mitigate foodborne pathogen risks on whole fruits such as apples and peaches. Further research would be helpful to optimize and validate such hurdle treatments for inactivating a broader spectrum of microbial pathogens on diverse produce surfaces.
新鲜农产品,如桃子和苹果,属于农产品,因此容易受到食源性病原体如[具体病原体1]和[具体病原体2]的污染。传统方法,如氯洗,在抗菌效果方面存在局限性,这促使人们对替代技术,如功率超声产生兴趣。本研究评估了单独使用功率超声以及将其与有机酸(柠檬酸、乳酸和苹果酸)联合使用,以减少完整苹果和桃子上病原体数量的效果。将[具体病原体1]和[具体病原体2]的病原体混合物以初始菌量8 - 9 log CFU/果实的水平点接种在果实表面。然后将果实分别浸泡在浓度为1%、2%或5%的水、柠檬酸、苹果酸或乳酸中,单独处理或结合40 kHz的功率超声处理2、5或10分钟。结果显示,苹果上的处理条件对病原体的减少效果显著大于桃子,这可能是因为与表面粗糙且覆盖有毛状体的桃子表面相比,苹果表面拓扑结构更光滑。在这两种病原体中,[具体病原体1]对处理的抗性显著更强,导致最大减少量约为4 log CFU/果实。相比之下,处理对[具体病原体2]更有效,因为仅乳酸就能使[具体病原体2]的菌量减少>6 log CFU/果实。苹果酸是对抗[具体病原体2]的第二有效有机酸。当有机酸与功率超声联合使用时,观察到了协同抗菌作用。例如,与单独使用有机酸处理相比,[具体病原体1]的菌量额外减少了2 - 3 log CFU/果实。这些发现支持将有机酸和功率超声作为一种有效的策略,用于降低苹果和桃子等完整水果上食源性病原体风险的障碍技术。进一步的研究将有助于优化和验证这种障碍处理方法,以灭活不同农产品表面更广泛的微生物病原体。