Suppr超能文献

一些潜在植物性蛋白质来源的营养成分与消化率概况

Nutritional Components and Digestibility Profiles of Some Potential Plant-Based Protein Sources.

作者信息

Anyiam Paul Ndubuisi, Phongthai Suphat, Sai-Ut Samart, Kingwascharapong Passakorn, Jung Young Hoon, Zhang Wanli, Rawdkuen Saroat

机构信息

Innovative Food Science and Technology Program, School of Agro-Industry, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand.

Department of Biochemistry, College of Natural Science, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Umuahia P.M.B 7262, Abia State, Nigeria.

出版信息

Foods. 2025 May 16;14(10):1769. doi: 10.3390/foods14101769.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The dominance of soybeans as the primary plant protein source has hindered the exploration of potential sources, limiting dietary diversity and innovation.

OBJECTIVE/METHODS: This study evaluated six plant protein sources-mung bean (MB), bambara bean (BN), jack bean (JB), sesame seed (SS), moringa seed (MS), and rice bran (RB)-compared to soybean (SB) for their chemical composition and biological qualities using standard methods.

RESULTS

Protein composition (14.98-30.29 g/100 g), fiber (2.90-8.18 g/100 g), and fat (5.19-33.30 g/100 g) varied across plants. Bulk density (0.49-0.74 g/mL), swelling capacity (0.25-0.55%), and yellowness (13.07-38.76) were comparable to SB. Electropherograms showed major protein bands at 20, 48, 75, and 100 kDa across plant proteins under non-reducing conditions. Phytate levels were highest in RB, while MS showed lower tannic acid composition (6.64 mg/100 g) compared to SB. Protein solubility (24.64-45.65%) increased with pH, while in vitro protein digestibility (74.86-87.64%) varied and was slightly below SB (91.07%); however, a similar pattern of protein digestion was observed under no reducing condition. MS and BN contained 31.17% and 42.47% of total essential amino acids with PDCAAS values of 41.42% and 58.46%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, MS and BN exhibited superior potential as sustainable protein sources, showing properties comparable to soybean.

摘要

背景

大豆作为主要植物蛋白来源的主导地位阻碍了对潜在来源的探索,限制了饮食多样性和创新。

目的/方法:本研究使用标准方法评估了六种植物蛋白来源——绿豆(MB)、 bambara豆(BN)、 刀豆(JB)、 芝麻籽(SS)、 辣木籽(MS)和米糠(RB)——与大豆(SB)相比的化学成分和生物学特性。

结果

不同植物的蛋白质组成(14.98 - 30.29克/100克)、 纤维(2.90 - 8.18克/100克)和脂肪(5.19 - 33.30克/100克)各不相同。 堆积密度(0.49 - 0.74克/毫升)、 膨胀能力(0.25 - 0.55%)和黄度(13.07 - 38.76)与大豆相当。 电泳图谱显示在非还原条件下,不同植物蛋白在20、 48、 75和100 kDa处有主要蛋白条带。 植酸水平在米糠中最高,而与大豆相比,辣木籽中的单宁酸组成较低(6.64毫克/100克)。 蛋白质溶解度(24.64 - 45.65%)随pH值升高而增加,而体外蛋白质消化率(74.86 - 87.64%)各不相同,略低于大豆(91.07%);然而,在非还原条件下观察到类似的蛋白质消化模式。 辣木籽和bambara豆分别含有31.17%和42.47%的总必需氨基酸,其蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分(PDCAAS)值分别为41.42%和58.46%。

结论

总体而言,辣木籽和bambara豆作为可持续蛋白质来源具有卓越潜力,其特性与大豆相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/715a/12111800/d414603287b8/foods-14-01769-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验