Luo Yudong, Miao Yonghong, Wang Peng, Gai Panpan, Yang Jingwei, Zhang Guiyu
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Materials (Basel). 2025 May 12;18(10):2242. doi: 10.3390/ma18102242.
When using supplementary cementitious materials to replace cement partially, the carbon emissions of cement products can be reduced, but it often leads to reduced strength. This study explores the application potential of carbide slag (CS) and calcined coal gangue (CCG), byproducts of acetylene production, to partially replace cement. The effects of these two materials on the macroscopic properties and microstructure of cement-based materials were analyzed through systematic experiments. The compressive strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, and electrical resistivity test results showed that replacing 20% of cement with CCG did not cause significant changes in the test results of the specimens. An X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis showed that these two materials can produce additional hydration products. Scanning electron microscopy images (SEM) further revealed that CCG produces hydration products to fill microscopic pores. Thermogravimetric analysis (TG) results after 28 days showed that with the addition of supplementary cementitious materials, calcium hydroxide (CH) in CS reacts with CCG, resulting in the consumption of CS. Finally, the environmental impact of CS and CCG was assessed. It was found that CS is more favorable for reducing carbon emissions compared to CCG. However, when considering the effect of cement replacement on compressive strength, combining these two materials is more advantageous for sustainable development. Overall, the use of CS and CCG demonstrated good performance in promoting sustainable development.
当使用辅助胶凝材料部分替代水泥时,水泥产品的碳排放可以减少,但这往往会导致强度降低。本研究探讨了乙炔生产副产品电石渣(CS)和煅烧煤矸石(CCG)部分替代水泥的应用潜力。通过系统实验分析了这两种材料对水泥基材料宏观性能和微观结构的影响。抗压强度、超声脉冲速度和电阻率测试结果表明,用CCG替代20%的水泥不会使试件的测试结果发生显著变化。X射线衍射(XRD)分析表明,这两种材料可以产生额外的水化产物。扫描电子显微镜图像(SEM)进一步显示,CCG产生水化产物填充微观孔隙。28天后的热重分析(TG)结果表明,随着辅助胶凝材料的加入,CS中的氢氧化钙(CH)与CCG发生反应,导致CS的消耗。最后,评估了CS和CCG的环境影响。发现与CCG相比,CS在减少碳排放方面更具优势。然而,考虑到水泥替代对抗压强度的影响,将这两种材料结合起来对可持续发展更有利。总体而言,CS和CCG的使用在促进可持续发展方面表现出良好的性能。