• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导管定向溶栓与抗凝治疗深静脉血栓形成的比较研究

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis vs. Anticoagulation in Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Saricaoglu Mehmet Cahit, Hasde Ali Ihsan, Karacuha Ali Fuat, Kayan Ahmet, Buyukcakır Onur, Akca Fatma, Ozcinar Evren, Baran Cagdas, Inan Mustafa Bahadir, Sirlak Mustafa, Yazicioglu Levent, Akar Ahmet Ruchan, Eryilmaz Sadik

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, Cebeci Hospitals, Ankara University School of Medicine, 06340 Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Trabzon Kanuni Education and Research Hospital, 61250 Trabzon, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 May 9;14(10):3298. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103298.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14103298
PMID:40429294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12112383/
Abstract

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an important component of venous thromboembolism and can lead to pulmonary embolism with high morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulant therapy alone (AC) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) are commonly used strategies for the management of DVT. Although CDT has been reported to be effective in reducing the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), it remains unclear in which patient groups it should be preferred due to the risk of bleeding. This retrospective study included 175 patients diagnosed with DVT between 2015 and 2024 (98 AC, 77 CDT). Patients with a diagnosis of proximal DVT, aged ≥18 years, and with at least 30 days of follow-up data were included. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and secondary endpoints were the length of hospitalization, pulmonary embolism, and bleeding complications. The CDT group was superior to AC in thrombus clearance rates, especially in iliac vein thrombosis (97.7% vs. 78%, = 0.003). Clinical symptoms improved faster in the CDT group, but total hospitalization was longer. There were no significant differences in bleeding complications and mortality rates between the two groups. The optimal approach to DVT treatment should be based on the patient's individual risk factors. Although CDT provides a higher thrombus clearance rate, especially in iliac vein thrombosis, it may not be suitable for all patients. Future large-scale studies will contribute to a better understanding of the long-term outcomes of interventional therapies.

摘要

深静脉血栓形成(DVT)是静脉血栓栓塞的重要组成部分,可导致具有高发病率和死亡率的肺栓塞。单纯抗凝治疗(AC)和导管定向溶栓(CDT)是DVT治疗中常用的策略。尽管据报道CDT在降低血栓后综合征(PTS)风险方面有效,但由于出血风险,在哪些患者群体中应优先选择CDT仍不清楚。这项回顾性研究纳入了2015年至2024年间诊断为DVT的175例患者(98例接受AC治疗,77例接受CDT治疗)。纳入诊断为近端DVT、年龄≥18岁且有至少30天随访数据的患者。主要终点是30天死亡率,次要终点是住院时间、肺栓塞和出血并发症。CDT组在血栓清除率方面优于AC组,尤其是在髂静脉血栓形成方面(97.7%对78%,P = 0.003)。CDT组临床症状改善更快,但总住院时间更长。两组在出血并发症和死亡率方面无显著差异。DVT治疗的最佳方法应基于患者的个体风险因素。尽管CDT提供了更高的血栓清除率,尤其是在髂静脉血栓形成方面,但它可能并不适用于所有患者。未来的大规模研究将有助于更好地了解介入治疗的长期结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c02/12112383/340b1b68db0f/jcm-14-03298-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c02/12112383/340b1b68db0f/jcm-14-03298-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c02/12112383/340b1b68db0f/jcm-14-03298-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis vs. Anticoagulation in Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Comparative Study.导管定向溶栓与抗凝治疗深静脉血栓形成的比较研究
J Clin Med. 2025 May 9;14(10):3298. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103298.
2
Catheter-directed thrombolysis of deep vein thrombosis: literature review and practice considerations.导管定向溶栓治疗深静脉血栓形成:文献综述与实践考量
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Dec;7(Suppl 3):S228-S237. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.09.15.
3
Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.导管溶栓与 AngioJet 机械溶栓导管治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓的疗效比较。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jan;12(1):101669. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
Evaluation of thrombolysis using tissue plasminogen activator in lower extremity deep venous thrombosis with concomitant femoral-popliteal venous segment involvement.下肢深静脉血栓形成伴股腘静脉段受累患者应用组织型纤溶酶原激活物溶栓的评估。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 Sep;5(5):613-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
5
Coagulation-monitored, dose-adjusted catheter-directed thrombolysis or pharmaco-mechanical thrombus removal in deep vein thrombosis.在深静脉血栓形成中,进行监测凝血功能、剂量调整的导管直接溶栓或药物机械血栓清除。
Vasa. 2023 Nov;52(6):416-422. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a001097. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
6
Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis, with or without Iliac Vein Stenting, in the Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis.药物机械性血栓切除术和导管定向溶栓术,联合或不联合髂静脉支架置入术,用于治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓形成
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jul 9;11(7):214. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11070214.
7
Thrombolytic strategies versus standard anticoagulation for acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb.下肢急性深静脉血栓形成的溶栓策略与标准抗凝治疗的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 19;1(1):CD002783. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002783.pub5.
8
Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Versus Standard Anticoagulation for Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.导管定向溶栓与标准抗凝治疗急性下肢深静脉血栓形成:临床试验的荟萃分析
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Oct;24(7):1134-1143. doi: 10.1177/1076029617739703. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis.急性深静脉血栓形成的溶栓治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):CD002783. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002783.pub4.
10
Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone to treat lower-extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis.比较导管溶栓联合抗凝与单纯抗凝治疗下肢近端深静脉血栓的疗效。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Sep;174(9):1494-501. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3415.

本文引用的文献

1
Rationale and design of the DEFIANCE study: A randomized controlled trial of mechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulation alone for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.DEFIANCE研究的原理与设计:一项关于髂股深静脉血栓形成的机械血栓切除术与单纯抗凝治疗的随机对照试验。
Am Heart J. 2025 Mar;281:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.016. Epub 2024 Nov 3.
2
Global Health Burden of Venous Thromboembolism.静脉血栓栓塞症的全球健康负担
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2024 May;44(5):1007-1011. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.320151. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
3
Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: Compendium and Review of CHEST Guidelines 2012-2021.
抗血栓治疗:VTE 疾病概要和 CHEST 指南 2012-2021 综述。
Chest. 2024 Aug;166(2):388-404. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
4
A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors and Thrombophilia Evaluation in Venous Thromboembolism.静脉血栓栓塞症的危险因素及易栓症评估综合综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 9;13(2):362. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020362.
5
Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Venous Thrombosis.编辑推荐——欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2021年静脉血栓形成管理临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jan;61(1):9-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
6
Catheter-Based Therapies and Other Management Strategies for Deep Vein Thrombosis and Post-Thrombotic Syndrome.基于导管的深静脉血栓形成和血栓后综合征治疗及其他管理策略
J Clin Med. 2020 May 12;9(5):1439. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051439.
7
Prevention and Management of the Post-Thrombotic Syndrome.血栓形成后综合征的预防与管理
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 27;9(4):923. doi: 10.3390/jcm9040923.
8
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS).2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)合作制定的急性肺栓塞诊断和管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 21;41(4):543-603. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405.
9
Comparison of Treatment Result Between Anticoagulation Alone and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation in Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis.急性下肢深静脉血栓形成单纯抗凝与导管定向溶栓联合抗凝治疗效果的比较
Vasc Specialist Int. 2019 Mar;35(1):28-33. doi: 10.5758/vsi.2019.35.1.28.
10
The Attract Trial: A Step Forward for Evidence Based DVT Care.ATTRACT试验:基于证据的深静脉血栓形成护理向前迈进的一步。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Sep;56(3):320-321. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jun 5.