Seth Ishith, Lim Kaiyang, Chang Edmond, Rozen Warren M, Ng Sally Kiu-Huen
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Peninsula Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.
Sensors (Basel). 2025 May 21;25(10):3238. doi: 10.3390/s25103238.
: Robotic surgical systems offer enhanced precision, motion scaling, tremor filtration, and visualization, making them highly suitable for the complex anatomical demands of plastic and reconstructive surgery. While widely implemented in other specialties, their integration in plastic surgery remains limited. This systematic review evaluates the clinical applications, outcomes, and limitations of robotic-assisted techniques in plastic and reconstructive procedures. : Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between January 1980 and March 2025. Clinical studies reporting robotic applications in plastic surgery were included, while cadaveric, animal, and non-English studies were excluded. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using Covidence and validated tools including the CARE checklist, NOS, GRADE, and SYRCLE. A total of 1428 studies were screened, and 31 met the inclusion criteria. : Robotic systems were primarily applied in microsurgery (), breast reconstruction (), and craniofacial/aesthetic surgery (). Common platforms included the Symani Surgical System, Da Vinci systems, and ARTAS. Robotic-assisted approaches improved precision, aesthetic outcomes, flap survival, and patient satisfaction, particularly in procedures involving lymphaticovenous anastomosis and nipple-sparing mastectomy. However, challenges included steep learning curves, longer operative times, high equipment costs, and the lack of haptic feedback. Quality assessment rated all studies as moderate. : Robotic-assisted surgery demonstrates considerable potential in enhancing plastic and reconstructive outcomes. As systems become more compact, cost-effective, and integrated with AI and biomimetic technologies, their broader adoption is anticipated. Further high-quality studies are needed to optimize these systems and support widespread clinical implementation.
机器人手术系统具有更高的精度、运动缩放、震颤过滤和可视化功能,使其非常适合整形和重建手术复杂的解剖学要求。虽然在其他专科中广泛应用,但它们在整形手术中的整合仍然有限。本系统评价评估了机器人辅助技术在整形和重建手术中的临床应用、结果和局限性。
按照PRISMA指南,在PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science上对1980年1月至2025年3月发表的研究进行了系统检索。纳入报告机器人在整形手术中应用的临床研究,排除尸体、动物和非英语研究。使用Covidence和经过验证的工具(包括CARE清单、NOS、GRADE和SYRCLE)进行数据提取和质量评估。共筛选了1428项研究,31项符合纳入标准。
机器人系统主要应用于显微外科()、乳房重建()和颅面/美容手术()。常见平台包括Symani手术系统、达芬奇系统和ARTAS。机器人辅助方法提高了精度、美学效果、皮瓣存活率和患者满意度,特别是在涉及淋巴管静脉吻合和保留乳头的乳房切除术的手术中。然而,挑战包括学习曲线陡峭、手术时间长、设备成本高以及缺乏触觉反馈。质量评估将所有研究评为中等质量。
机器人辅助手术在改善整形和重建效果方面显示出巨大潜力。随着系统变得更加紧凑、经济高效,并与人工智能和仿生技术集成,预计它们将得到更广泛的应用。需要进一步开展高质量研究,以优化这些系统并支持其广泛的临床应用。