• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过爱婴医院倡议认证的组织中患者和员工的文化解读:一项聚焦人种志研究

Cultural Interpretations of Patients and Employees in an Organization Certified Through the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative: A Focused Ethnographic Study.

作者信息

Durocher Keri, Jackson Kimberley T, Booth Richard, Tryphonopoulos Panagiota

机构信息

Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Hum Lact. 2025 Aug;41(3):423-433. doi: 10.1177/08903344251337375. Epub 2025 May 27.

DOI:10.1177/08903344251337375
PMID:40432287
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12238666/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

When organizations are certified through the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, health care providers implement various policies that are intended to support long-term and exclusive breastfeeding. Despite the availability of evidence to support these policies, research findings are inconsistent in whether these goals are met. Exploring cultural interpretations through the lens of individuals within these organizations may reveal new evidence of breastfeeding experiences and needed support.

RESEARCH AIM

To explore organizational cultural aspects of a Baby-Friendly certified organization from the perspective of patients and employees.

METHOD

Researchers implemented a focused ethnography design in one certified organization in Ontario, Canada. One-to-one, semi-structured interviews were performed with two participant groups, including 10 patients and eight employees within intrapartum and postpartum care areas between 2023-2024. An inductive data analysis approach followed Roper and Shapira's framework, including (1) coding for descriptive labels, (2) sorting for patterns, (3) identification of outliers, (4) generalizing with constructs and theories, and (5) memoing.

RESULTS

Five core themes emerged from the data, including (1) knowledge is power, (2) community of support, (3) contextual considerations, (4) environment for breastfeeding, and (5) patient factors. Through narrative descriptions, these interrelated themes exhibit how patients and employees have experienced or provided care that is consistent with breastfeeding-supportive policies as well as additional gaps that may not be addressed through policy research.

CONCLUSION

The results provide implications for breastfeeding support within an organization certified through the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. Understanding cultural interpretations of breastfeeding can provide information for future education and interprofessional development.

摘要

背景

当医疗机构通过“爱婴医院倡议”获得认证时,医护人员会实施各种旨在支持长期纯母乳喂养的政策。尽管有证据支持这些政策,但关于这些目标是否实现的研究结果并不一致。从这些机构中个体的角度探索文化解读,可能会揭示母乳喂养经历和所需支持的新证据。

研究目的

从患者和员工的角度探索一家获得“爱婴医院倡议”认证机构的组织文化方面。

方法

研究人员在加拿大安大略省的一家认证机构实施了聚焦民族志设计。在2023年至2024年期间,对两个参与群体进行了一对一的半结构化访谈,包括10名患者和8名在产时和产后护理区域的员工。采用归纳数据分析方法,遵循罗珀和沙皮拉的框架,包括(1)为描述性标签编码,(2)分类以找出模式,(3)识别异常值,(4)用概念和理论进行概括,以及(5)做笔记。

结果

数据中出现了五个核心主题,包括(1)知识就是力量,(2)支持社区,(3)情境考虑,(4)母乳喂养环境,以及(5)患者因素。通过叙事描述,这些相互关联的主题展示了患者和员工如何经历或提供与支持母乳喂养政策一致的护理,以及政策研究可能未涉及的其他差距。

结论

研究结果为通过“爱婴医院倡议”认证的机构内的母乳喂养支持提供了启示。理解对母乳喂养的文化解读可为未来的教育和跨专业发展提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b89/12238666/5ef007b8d17b/10.1177_08903344251337375-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b89/12238666/5ef007b8d17b/10.1177_08903344251337375-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b89/12238666/5ef007b8d17b/10.1177_08903344251337375-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Cultural Interpretations of Patients and Employees in an Organization Certified Through the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative: A Focused Ethnographic Study.通过爱婴医院倡议认证的组织中患者和员工的文化解读:一项聚焦人种志研究
J Hum Lact. 2025 Aug;41(3):423-433. doi: 10.1177/08903344251337375. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
6
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Breastfeeding promotion for infants in neonatal units: a systematic review and economic analysis.新生儿病房中促进婴儿母乳喂养的系统评价与经济分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Aug;13(40):1-146, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13400.
8
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
9
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
10
A Spectrum of Understanding: A Qualitative Exploration of Autistic Adults' Understandings and Perceptions of Friendship(s).理解的光谱:对自闭症成年人对友谊的理解与认知的质性探索
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):438-450. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0051. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Doing our best and doing no harm: A focused ethnography of staff moral experiences of providing palliative care at a Médecins Sans Frontières pediatric hospital in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.尽我所能,不造成伤害:对孟加拉国考克斯巴扎尔无国界医生组织儿科医院工作人员提供姑息治疗的道德体验进行集中民族志研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 20;18(7):e0288938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288938. eCollection 2023.
2
Race/ethnicity-specific associations between breastfeeding information source and breastfeeding rates among U.S. women.美国女性中,母乳喂养信息来源与母乳喂养率之间的种族/民族特异性关联。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 17;23(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15447-8.
3
Disability and in-hospital breastfeeding practices and supports in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.
加拿大安大略省的残疾与住院母乳喂养实践和支持:基于人群的研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Jan;8(1):e47-e56. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00310-3.
4
Breastfeeding, socioeconomic status, and long-term postpartum weight retention.母乳喂养、社会经济地位与产后长期体重滞留。
Int Breastfeed J. 2023 Jan 5;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13006-022-00534-0.
5
The effectiveness of prenatal breastfeeding education on breastfeeding uptake postpartum: A systematic review.产前母乳喂养教育对产后母乳喂养率的影响:系统评价。
Midwifery. 2023 Mar;118:103579. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103579. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
Changes in Breastfeeding Exclusivity and Satisfaction During the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间母乳喂养的排他性和满意度变化。
J Hum Lact. 2022 Aug;38(3):433-442. doi: 10.1177/08903344221086974. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
7
What Women Really Think About Breastfeeding and Breast Pumping: A Qualitative Analysis of Women Who Deliver at a Baby-Friendly Hospital.女性对母乳喂养和吸奶器的真实看法:对在母婴友好医院分娩的女性的定性分析。
Breastfeed Med. 2022 Jan;17(1):65-71. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2021.0135. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
8
How the hospital context influences nurses' environmentally responsible practice: A focused ethnography.医院环境如何影响护士的环保实践:一项聚焦民族志研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Sep;77(9):3806-3819. doi: 10.1111/jan.14936. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
9
The impact of Baby Friendly Initiative accreditation: An overview of systematic reviews.《促进母乳喂养适宜技术( BFHI )认证的影响:系统评价综述》。
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Oct;17(4):e13216. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13216. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
10
#EveryGenerationMatters: Intergenerational Perceptions of Infant Feeding Information and Communication Among African American Women.每个世代都重要:非裔美国女性对婴儿喂养信息的代际认知和交流。
Breastfeed Med. 2021 Feb;16(2):131-139. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0308.