• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安大略省居家新冠临床初级护理路径的实施与评估。

The implementation and evaluation of the Ontario COVID@Home Clinical Primary Care Pathway.

作者信息

Mangin Dee, Salerno Jennifer, Clark Rebecca, Datta Julie, Lawson Jennifer, Dempsey Mara, Elston Dawn, Hafid Shuaib, Price David, Kaplan David, Risdon Cathy, Irvin Casey, Beaulieu Erin

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8P 1H6, Canada.

Department of General Practice, University of Otago, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2025 Apr 12;42(3). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaf022.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmaf022
PMID:40432302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12116880/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID@Home Clinical Care Pathway (the Pathway) was developed and implemented as an evidence-based remote monitoring clinical care pathway for the integrated management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the province of Ontario, Canada. We examine its effectiveness and rapid large-scale implementation.

METHODS

Using a prospective longitudinal study design, we used electronic medical record clinical data, provider and patient surveys, web analytics, healthcare and provincial utilization, and government holdings data to evaluate reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance outcomes, including patient mortality and health equity.

RESULTS

The Pathway was widely accessed (19 474 Ontario unique users), contributed 28 816 oxygen saturation monitors, and achieved coverage across income levels and geography. Two-thirds of patients had > 1 encounter, monitored for a median of 4 days (Range: 1-57). Fifty percent of patients had > 1 chronic condition. Patients receiving Pathway care were less likely to die by 0.44% (20/4556), two times lower compared to the total mortality of a population-based representative patient cohort over a parallel time period in Ontario of 0.86% (1820/212 326, P = .0023). Patients were very satisfied with their care, and felt care was accessible, safe, and clear. Providers were very satisfied with the Pathway resources and reported strengthened relationships across the health system.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care (PC) rapidly implemented a clinical care pathway during the COVID-19 crisis. The Pathway demonstrated the beneficial role and effectiveness of PC when patients are provided with timely, accessible, and comprehensive care. Public health responses should explicitly collaborate with PC to address population health.

摘要

背景

“居家抗疫临床护理路径”(以下简称“路径”)是作为一种基于证据的远程监测临床护理路径而制定和实施的,用于加拿大安大略省对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)进行综合管理。我们对其有效性和快速大规模实施情况进行了研究。

方法

采用前瞻性纵向研究设计,我们使用电子病历临床数据、提供者和患者调查、网络分析、医疗保健和省级利用情况以及政府持有数据,以评估覆盖范围、有效性、采用情况、实施情况和维持结果,包括患者死亡率和健康公平性。

结果

该“路径”被广泛访问(19474名安大略省独立用户),提供了28816台血氧饱和度监测仪,并实现了不同收入水平和地域的覆盖。三分之二的患者有超过1次就诊,监测时间中位数为4天(范围:1 - 57天)。50%的患者患有超过1种慢性病。接受“路径”护理的患者死亡可能性降低0.44%(20/4556),与安大略省同期基于人群的代表性患者队列0.86%(1820/212326)相比,降低了两倍(P = 0.0023)。患者对其护理非常满意,并认为护理可及、安全且清晰。提供者对“路径”资源非常满意,并报告称整个卫生系统内的关系得到了加强。

结论

在COVID-19危机期间,初级保健迅速实施了临床护理路径。当为患者提供及时、可及且全面的护理时,该“路径”展示了初级保健的有益作用和有效性。公共卫生应对措施应与初级保健明确协作以解决人群健康问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2952/12116880/1c2d06041102/cmaf022_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2952/12116880/4ae0f280a26a/cmaf022_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2952/12116880/b9aaf4a0471d/cmaf022_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2952/12116880/1c2d06041102/cmaf022_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2952/12116880/4ae0f280a26a/cmaf022_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2952/12116880/b9aaf4a0471d/cmaf022_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2952/12116880/1c2d06041102/cmaf022_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
The implementation and evaluation of the Ontario COVID@Home Clinical Primary Care Pathway.安大略省居家新冠临床初级护理路径的实施与评估。
Fam Pract. 2025 Apr 12;42(3). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaf022.
2
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
3
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
4
Rapid Transition to Telehealth and the Digital Divide: Implications for Primary Care Access and Equity in a Post-COVID Era.快速向远程医疗和数字鸿沟过渡:在后 COVID-19 时代对初级保健可及性和公平性的影响。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):340-368. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12509. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
5
Virtual Health Care for Community Management of Patients With COVID-19 in Australia: Observational Cohort Study.澳大利亚 COVID-19 患者社区管理中的虚拟医疗保健:观察性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 9;23(3):e21064. doi: 10.2196/21064.
6
The Utilization of Electronic Consultations (eConsults) to Address Emerging Questions Related to Long COVID-19 in Ontario, Canada: Mixed Methods Analysis.利用电子会诊(eConsults)解决加拿大安大略省与长期新冠病毒感染相关的新出现问题:混合方法分析。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Feb 28;12:e58582. doi: 10.2196/58582.
7
Clinical learnings from a virtual primary care program monitoring mild to moderate COVID-19 patients at home.从一个虚拟的初级保健项目中获得的临床经验,该项目在家中监测轻症至中度 COVID-19 患者。
Fam Pract. 2021 Sep 25;38(5):549-555. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa130.
8
Patient and provider perspectives of a new prenatal care model introduced in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.患者和提供者对 2019 冠状病毒病大流行背景下引入的新产前保健模式的看法。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):384.e1-384.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
9
Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection before and after the Omicron wave in a cohort of healthcare workers in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省一组医护人员在奥密克戎毒株浪潮前后感染新冠病毒的风险。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 7;25(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10580-8.
10
Exploring the use and challenges of implementing virtual visits during COVID-19 in primary care and lessons for sustained use.探讨在 COVID-19 期间在初级保健中实施虚拟访视的使用情况和挑战,以及持续使用的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 24;16(6):e0253665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253665. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Describing primary care patterns before and during the COVID-19 pandemic across Canada: a quasi-experimental pre-post design cohort study using national practice-based research network data.描述 COVID-19 大流行前后加拿大的初级保健模式:使用全国基于实践的研究网络数据的准实验前后设计队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 21;14(5):e084608. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084608.
2
Operationalising generalism in medical education: a narrative review of international policy and mission documents.将通才理念运用于医学教育:对国际政策和使命文件的叙述性综述。
Educ Prim Care. 2024 May-Jul;35(3-4):81-91. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2023.2275262. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
3
Use and misuse of research: Canada's response to covid-19 and its health inequalities.
研究的运用与误用:加拿大对新冠疫情及其健康不平等问题的应对
BMJ. 2023 Jul 24;382:e075666. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075666.
4
The Impact of COVID-19 on Primary Care: A Scoping Review.2019年冠状病毒病对初级保健的影响:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2023 Jan 2;15(1):e33241. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33241. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Implementation and Evaluation of COVIDCare@Home, a Family Medicine-Led Remote Monitoring Program for Patients With COVID-19: Multimethod Cross-sectional Study.COVIDCare@Home的实施与评估,一项由家庭医学主导的针对新冠肺炎患者的远程监测项目:多方法横断面研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jun 28;9(2):e35091. doi: 10.2196/35091.
6
Evaluation of the relative virulence of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants: a retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada.评估新型 SARS-CoV-2 变种的相对毒力:加拿大安大略省的回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2021 Oct 25;193(42):E1619-E1625. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.211248. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
7
Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway.一般实践中的连续性作为死亡率、急性住院和非工作时间护理使用的预测因素:挪威基于登记的观察性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jan 27;72(715):e84-e90. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0340. Print 2022 Feb.
8
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
9
The use of inhaled corticosteroids in early-stage COVID-19.吸入性糖皮质激素在新冠肺炎早期的应用。
Lancet. 2021 Sep 4;398(10303):818-819. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01809-2. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
10
Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resources.理解与应用RE-AIM框架:阐释与资源
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 May 14;5(1):e126. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.789. eCollection 2021.