Martinez-Cajas Jorge L, Jolly Ann, Gong Yanping, Evans Gerald, Perez-Patrigeon Santiago, Stoner Bradley, Guan T Hugh, Alvarado Beatriz
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Ottawa Public Health, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 7;25(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10580-8.
Longitudinal healthcare worker (HCW) cohorts throughout the COVID-19 pandemic provide a unique opportunity to study the relative contributions of various exposures to infection risk over time. This study aimed to examine how demographic, health, occupational, household and community factors influenced the SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in a cohort of HCWs in Southeastern Ontario, Canada, during the early pandemic and the Omicron waves. We compared the contribution of these factors to infection risk and explored the implications for future epidemic preparedness and the protection of HCWs.
We conducted a longitudinal analysis using data from a cohort of HCWs recruited from one acute care hospital and four long-term care homes. The analysis was divided into two periods: the initial phase of the pandemic (period #1) and the first three Omicron waves (period #2). We employed Poisson regression for period #1 and Cox regression for period #2 to examine associations of demographic factors (age, sex, ethnicity, migration status, income insufficiency), health factors (chronic conditions, smoking history, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status), household factors (exposure to COVID-19), occupational factors (work role, exposure to COVID-19 patients, personal protective equipment access, aerosol-generating procedures) and community exposures (use of masks, distance, hand-washing) with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
At period #1, 17/208 (8.2%) HCWs reported having had SARS-CoV-2 infection. At period #2, 65/167 (38.3%) reported at least one SARS-CoV-2 infection. In period #1, factors associated with increased risk of infection included working in a long-term care home, exposure to more COVID-19-positive patients, working as a nurse or therapist, and inadequate use of personal protective equipment. In period #2, the hazard of infection was higher among HCWs who had COVID-19-infected children at home, whereas the use of protective measures in the community (maintaining social distance, mask-wearing) and receiving a vaccine booster were associated with reduced risk. Providing care to COVID-19 patients was not associated with the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection at period #2.
During the Omicron wave, community and household exposures, but not occupational exposure to COVID-19 cases, were the primary factors contributing to infection risk in HCWs. This contrasts with the early waves of the pandemic where occupational exposures played a significant role. These findings may be explained by the effectiveness of institutional interventions in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in healthcare settings, alongside the failure of community-level interventions to mitigate risk during the Omicron period.
在整个新冠疫情期间,对医护人员进行纵向队列研究,为随时间推移研究各种暴露因素对感染风险的相对贡献提供了独特机会。本研究旨在探讨人口统计学、健康、职业、家庭和社区因素如何影响加拿大安大略省东南部一组医护人员在疫情早期和奥密克戎毒株流行期间的新冠病毒感染风险。我们比较了这些因素对感染风险的贡献,并探讨了其对未来疫情防范和医护人员保护的影响。
我们使用从一家急症护理医院和四家长期护理机构招募的医护人员队列数据进行纵向分析。分析分为两个阶段:疫情初始阶段(第1阶段)和前三次奥密克戎毒株流行期(第2阶段)。我们在第1阶段采用泊松回归,在第2阶段采用Cox回归,以研究人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、种族、移民身份、收入不足)、健康因素(慢性病、吸烟史、新冠病毒疫苗接种状况)、家庭因素(接触新冠病毒)、职业因素(工作角色、接触新冠病毒患者、获得个人防护装备、产生气溶胶的操作)和社区暴露因素(佩戴口罩、保持距离、洗手)与新冠病毒感染之间的关联。
在第1阶段,208名医护人员中有17名(8.2%)报告感染了新冠病毒。在第2阶段,167名医护人员中有65名(38.3%)报告至少感染过一次新冠病毒。在第1阶段,与感染风险增加相关的因素包括在长期护理机构工作、接触更多新冠病毒检测呈阳性的患者、担任护士或治疗师以及个人防护装备使用不足。在第2阶段,家中有感染新冠病毒儿童的医护人员感染风险更高,而在社区采取防护措施(保持社交距离、佩戴口罩)和接种加强针与感染风险降低相关。在第2阶段,为新冠病毒患者提供护理与感染新冠病毒的风险无关。
在奥密克戎毒株流行期间,社区和家庭暴露而非职业性接触新冠病毒病例是医护人员感染风险的主要因素。这与疫情早期职业暴露起重要作用形成对比。这些发现可能是由于机构干预措施在降低医疗环境中新冠病毒传播风险方面的有效性,以及社区层面干预措施在奥密克戎毒株流行期间未能降低风险所致。