• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估马尔堡心脏评分在急诊科对胸痛患者进行分诊的疗效:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究。

Evaluating the Efficacy of the Marburg Heart Score to Triage Patients Presenting With Chest Pain in an Emergency Department: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.

作者信息

Druilhe Loïc, Creusier Lucie, Pasco Jérémy, Eloi Julie, Furet Virginie, Roupie Eric, Macrez Richard

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Tours, Tours, France.

Caen University Hospital, Polyvalent Medicine Department, Caen, France.

出版信息

Emerg Med Int. 2025 May 20;2025:6085679. doi: 10.1155/emmi/6085679. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1155/emmi/6085679
PMID:40432912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12116132/
Abstract

Chest pain is a common complaint in emergency departments. Although most patients are admitted to emergency department intensive care, only 12% have acute coronary syndrome. An accurate, efficient score is needed to improve triage and prevent unnecessary referrals to emergency department intensive care. The Marburg Heart Score, validated to rule out acute coronary syndrome in primary care, is quick to administer and does not require test results. This study aims to assess whether the Marburg Heart Score is effective in a triage setting for patients presenting with chest pain in emergency departments. This prospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted with triage nurses in four hospitals in France between July 15, 2018, and May 31, 2019. The primary endpoint was the negative predictive value of the Marburg Heart Score ≤ 2 for ruling out acute coronary syndrome. Acute coronary syndrome diagnosis was made using medical record data combined with a diagnosis from the physician in charge. A total of 1045 patients were included. For a cutoff score of ≤ 2, the negative predictive value for suspected acute coronary syndrome was 95.6% (95% CI [94.0-97.2]) and the area under the curve was 0.603 (95% CI [0.521-0.685]). There were 28 false negatives, two of which were due to the score being completed incorrectly. This study reveals that the Marburg Heart Score is an efficient tool to direct patients presenting with chest pain and MHS < 2 to a conventional ED bed. This could potentially optimize triage in the emergency department to prevent overloading the emergency department intensive care.

摘要

胸痛是急诊科常见的主诉。尽管大多数患者被收入急诊科重症监护病房,但只有12%患有急性冠脉综合征。需要一个准确、有效的评分来改善分诊并避免不必要的转诊至急诊科重症监护病房。马尔堡心脏评分在基层医疗中已得到验证,可排除急性冠脉综合征,其实施快速且无需检查结果。本研究旨在评估马尔堡心脏评分在急诊科对胸痛患者进行分诊时是否有效。这项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究于2018年7月15日至2019年5月31日在法国四家医院与分诊护士共同开展。主要终点是马尔堡心脏评分≤2排除急性冠脉综合征的阴性预测值。急性冠脉综合征的诊断采用病历数据结合主管医生的诊断。共纳入1045例患者。对于截断值≤2时,疑似急性冠脉综合征的阴性预测值为95.6%(95%可信区间[94.0 - 97.2]),曲线下面积为0.603(95%可信区间[0.521 - 0.685])。有28例假阴性,其中两例是由于评分填写错误。本研究表明,马尔堡心脏评分是一种有效的工具,可将胸痛且马尔堡心脏评分<2的患者分诊至普通急诊科床位。这有可能优化急诊科分诊以防止急诊科重症监护病房过度负荷。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c750/12116132/c8a7b19cfaba/EMI2025-6085679.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c750/12116132/c8a7b19cfaba/EMI2025-6085679.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c750/12116132/c8a7b19cfaba/EMI2025-6085679.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Efficacy of the Marburg Heart Score to Triage Patients Presenting With Chest Pain in an Emergency Department: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.评估马尔堡心脏评分在急诊科对胸痛患者进行分诊的疗效:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究。
Emerg Med Int. 2025 May 20;2025:6085679. doi: 10.1155/emmi/6085679. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.
3
Prevalence, clinical characteristics, resource utilization and outcome of patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department. A multicenter, prospective, observational study in north-eastern Italy.急诊科急性胸痛患者的患病率、临床特征、资源利用及结局。意大利东北部的一项多中心、前瞻性观察性研究。
Ital Heart J. 2003 May;4(5):318-24.
4
Evaluation of the Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care.在非工作时间的初级医疗保健中,将马尔堡心脏评分和INTERCHEST评分与当前胸痛电话分诊进行比较的评估。
Neth Heart J. 2023 Apr;31(4):157-165. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01745-0. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
5
Chest pain in the emergency department: risk stratification with Manchester triage system and HEART score.急诊科的胸痛:采用曼彻斯特分诊系统和HEART评分进行风险分层
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 Jun 11;15:48. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0049-6.
6
Improving triage accuracy through a modified nurse-administered emergency department assessment of chest pain score on patients with chest pain at triage (EDACT): A prospective observational study.通过改良护士实施的胸痛分诊急诊科评估(EDACT)评分提高胸痛患者分诊准确性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2022 Mar;61:101130. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101130. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
7
Pre-hospital evaluation of chest pain patients using the modified HEART-score: rationale and design.采用改良的 HEART 评分对胸痛患者进行院前评估:原理和设计。
Future Cardiol. 2024 Apr 25;20(5-6):241-250. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2356995. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
8
Add-on tests for improving risk-stratification in emergency department patients with chest pain who are at low to moderate risk of 30-day major adverse cardiac events.用于改善急诊科胸痛患者风险分层的附加检测,这些患者30天内发生重大不良心脏事件的风险为低到中度。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.057. Epub 2016 May 14.
9
Triage of patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department: implementation of coronary CT angiography in a large urban health care system.胸痛患者在急诊科的分诊:在大型城市卫生保健系统中实施冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jan;200(1):57-65. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8808.
10
Computed tomographic coronary artery calcium assessment for evaluating chest pain in the emergency department: long-term outcome of a prospective blind study.计算机断层扫描冠状动脉钙化评估用于急诊科胸痛的评估:前瞻性盲法研究的长期结果。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Apr;85(4):314-22. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0620.

本文引用的文献

1
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
2
Evaluation of the Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score compared to current telephone triage for chest pain in out-of-hours primary care.在非工作时间的初级医疗保健中,将马尔堡心脏评分和INTERCHEST评分与当前胸痛电话分诊进行比较的评估。
Neth Heart J. 2023 Apr;31(4):157-165. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01745-0. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
3
Performance of risk scores for coronary artery disease: a retrospective cohort study of patients with chest pain in urgent primary care.
风险评分在冠心病中的表现:一项在紧急初级保健中胸痛患者的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 8;11(12):e045387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045387.
4
2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR 胸痛评估与诊断指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2021 Nov 30;144(22):e368-e454. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
5
Diagnosis and risk stratification of chest pain patients in the emergency department: focus on acute coronary syndromes. A position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association.急诊科胸痛患者的诊断和风险分层:重点关注急性冠状动脉综合征。急性心血管护理协会的立场文件。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Feb;9(1):76-89. doi: 10.1177/2048872619885346. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
6
A Nationwide Flash-Mob Study for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.全国范围内疑似急性冠状动脉综合征的闪电式调查研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jul;17(4):296-303. doi: 10.1370/afm.2401.
7
Chest pain in general practice: a systematic review of prediction rules.全科医疗中的胸痛:预测规则的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 27;9(2):e027081. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027081.
8
Description of chest pain patients in a Norwegian emergency department.挪威一家急诊科胸痛患者的描述。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2019 Feb;53(1):28-34. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2019.1583362. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
9
Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 14;40(3):237-269. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462.
10
Management of chest pain in the French emergency healthcare system: the prospective observational EPIDOULTHO study.法国急救医疗体系中胸痛的管理:前瞻性观察性 EPIDOULTHO 研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(6):404-410. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000481.