Chiribagula Christian, Bisimwa Ghislain, Hermans Michel P, Dramaix Michele, Makali Samuel, Ngaboyeka Gaylord, Chimanuka Christine, Lembebu Corneille, Bigirinama Rosine, Wells Jonathan C, Mwene-Batu Pacifique
Ecole Regionale de Santé Publique, Université Catholique de Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Division of Endocrinology & Nutrition, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Apr 9;3(1):e001510. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001510. eCollection 2025.
While most studies of adults with a history of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) focused on survival and long-term non-communicable diseases, few studies have examined community health. The aim of this study was to compare the overall health status and its predictors between adults with a history of SAM and healthy controls in the context of Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS).
We evaluated 257 adults in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo who were treated for SAM during childhood between 1988 and 2007. They were compared with 187 age-matched and sex-matched control adults living in the same community who had not been exposed to malnutrition as a child. The main outcome was the WHODAS summary score, measuring an individual's health status in six domains of disability (household daily tasks, cognitive, mobility, self-care, social networks and social participation). A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify the predictors of health status.
The median age of the participants in both groups was 20 years. The median (P25-P75) WHODAS score in SAM+ participants was 25.0 (14.6-33.3), whereas it was 8.3 (4.2-14.6) in SAM- participants (p<0.001). In five of the six disability domains (except individual self-care), SAM+ participants had significantly higher scores (poorer health) than SAM- participants. Consequently, 63% of SAM+ participants had a higher level of dependency compared with 16.6% of SAM- participants. Finally, being SAM+ was predictive of a higher WHODAS score (OR 8.6, 95% CI 5.4 to 13.6, p=0.002). In the multivariable logistic regression model, occupation, socioeconomic status and use of social networks, introduced separately in addition to SAM, remained significant but had no confounding effect on the association between SAM and WHODAS score.
SAM during childhood has deleterious consequences on the state of health during adulthood. It is imperative to implement interventions to prevent and treat SAM during childhood to maximise adult population health.
虽然大多数针对有严重急性营养不良(SAM)病史的成年人的研究都集中在生存情况和长期非传染性疾病上,但很少有研究关注社区健康状况。本研究旨在使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS),比较刚果民主共和国东部地区有SAM病史的成年人与健康对照者的总体健康状况及其预测因素。
我们评估了刚果民主共和国东部地区257名在1988年至2007年儿童时期接受过SAM治疗的成年人。将他们与187名年龄和性别匹配的居住在同一社区且儿童时期未经历过营养不良的对照成年人进行比较。主要结局指标是WHODAS总分,用于衡量个体在六个残疾领域(家庭日常任务、认知、行动能力、自我护理、社交网络和社会参与)的健康状况。采用多变量逻辑回归模型来确定健康状况的预测因素。
两组参与者的年龄中位数均为20岁。有SAM病史的参与者(SAM+)的WHODAS评分中位数(P25-P75)为25.0(14.6-33.3),而无SAM病史的参与者(SAM-)为8.3(4.2-14.6)(p<0.001)。在六个残疾领域中的五个领域(个体自我护理除外),SAM+参与者的得分显著高于SAM-参与者(健康状况更差)。因此,63%的SAM+参与者的依赖程度较高,而SAM-参与者中这一比例为16.6%。最后,有SAM病史是WHODAS评分较高的预测因素(比值比8.6,95%置信区间5.4至13.6,p=0.002)。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,除了SAM之外单独引入的职业、社会经济地位和社交网络的使用仍然具有显著性,但对SAM与WHODAS评分之间的关联没有混杂效应。
儿童时期的SAM对成年后的健康状况有有害影响。必须实施干预措施,在儿童时期预防和治疗SAM,以最大限度地提高成年人口的健康水平。