Zhao Ruoxuan, Nawrocki Arkadiusz, Møller-Jensen Jakob, Liu Gang, Olsen John Elmerdahl, Thomsen Line Elnif
Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Region Syddanmark, Denmark.
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0009025. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00090-25. Epub 2025 May 28.
The SOS response is a critical DNA damage repair mechanism in bacteria, designed to counteract genotoxic stress and ensure survival. This system can be activated by different classes of antimicrobial agents, each inducing the SOS response through different mechanisms. Moreover, it has been observed that certain antibiotics can enhance conjugative plasmid transfer frequencies. However, while previous studies have suggested that the SOS response contributes to horizontal transfer of certain genes, its role in plasmid conjugation remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the SOS response and conjugation of IncI1 and IncFII plasmids harboring various resistance genes. Results showed that cefotaxime and mitomycin C induced both the SOS response and conjugation, while ciprofloxacin induced the SOS response without affecting conjugation frequencies. Further analysis of SOS mutants, ranging from constitutively inactive to hyper-induced states, revealed no correlation between SOS levels and conjugation frequencies, despite upregulation of gene expression in a SOS hyper-induced strain. Proteomic analysis revealed that cefotaxime-induced conjugation was associated with increased transfer and pilus protein expression. In contrast, the SOS hyper-induced strain displayed limited upregulation of plasmid-encoded proteins, suggesting post-transcriptional regulation. Additionally, putative LexA binding sites on the IncI1 plasmid revealed potential SOS-mediated regulation of plasmid genes, highlighting the interaction between the SOS response and plasmid, although it did not significantly affect conjugation.IMPORTANCEPlasmids play a critical role in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance through conjugation. Recent research suggests that the use of antibiotics not only selects for already resistant variants but further increases the rate of plasmid-encoded conjugative transmission by increasing expression of the conjugative system. At the same time, these antibiotics are known to induce the stress-related SOS response in bacteria. To be able to counteract an antibiotic-induced increase in conjugative transfer of resistance plasmid, there is a need for a fundamental understanding of the regulation of transmission, including whether this happens through activation of the SOS response. In this research, we show that antibiotic-induced conjugation and induction of the SOS response happen through different mechanisms, and thus that future strategies to control the spread of antibiotics cannot interfere with the SOS response as its target.
SOS反应是细菌中一种关键的DNA损伤修复机制,旨在应对基因毒性应激并确保生存。该系统可被不同种类的抗菌剂激活,每种抗菌剂通过不同机制诱导SOS反应。此外,据观察某些抗生素可提高接合质粒的转移频率。然而,尽管先前的研究表明SOS反应有助于某些基因的水平转移,但其在质粒接合中的作用仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们调查了SOS反应与携带各种耐药基因的IncI1和IncFII质粒接合之间的关系。结果显示,头孢噻肟和丝裂霉素C既诱导了SOS反应又诱导了接合,而环丙沙星诱导了SOS反应但不影响接合频率。对从组成型无活性到过度诱导状态的SOS突变体的进一步分析表明,尽管在SOS过度诱导菌株中基因表达上调,但SOS水平与接合频率之间没有相关性。蛋白质组学分析表明,头孢噻肟诱导的接合与转移和菌毛蛋白表达增加有关。相比之下,SOS过度诱导菌株显示出质粒编码蛋白的上调有限,表明存在转录后调控。此外,IncI1质粒上假定的LexA结合位点揭示了SOS介导的质粒基因潜在调控,突出了SOS反应与质粒之间的相互作用,尽管这并未显著影响接合。
重要性
质粒在通过接合传播抗生素耐药性方面起着关键作用。最近的研究表明,抗生素的使用不仅选择了已经耐药的变体,还通过增加接合系统的表达进一步提高了质粒编码的接合传播速率。同时,已知这些抗生素会在细菌中诱导与应激相关的SOS反应。为了能够对抗抗生素诱导的耐药性质粒接合转移增加,需要从根本上了解传播的调控,包括这是否通过激活SOS反应发生。在本研究中,我们表明抗生素诱导的接合和SOS反应的诱导通过不同机制发生,因此未来控制抗生素传播的策略不能以SOS反应为靶点进行干扰。