文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

M6-C™椎间盘相关骨质溶解后颈椎翻修置换术的患者预后及手术策略

Patient outcomes and surgical strategies in revision cervical arthroplasty following M6-C™ disc-related osteolysis.

作者信息

Scott-Young Matthew, Nielsen David, Riar Sukhman, Rathbone Evelyne

机构信息

Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, 27 Garden Street, Southport, Gold Coast, QLD, 4215, Australia.

Gold Coast Spine, Gold Coast, QLD, 4215, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08926-6.


DOI:10.1007/s00586-025-08926-6
PMID:40434584
Abstract

PURPOSE: Periprosthetic osteolysis from the M6-C™ Artificial Cervical Disc (Orthofix, Lewisville, Texas) has become a significant issue, sometimes requiring revision spine surgery (RSS). This study evaluates patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and revision strategies for managing device-related wear and osteolysis. METHODS: PROMs, including the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck/arm pain and the Neck Disability Index (NDI), were analyzed at pre-index surgery (T1), pre-RSS (T2), and final follow-up (T3). Osteolysis severity was graded radiographically. A control group who underwent primary M6-C cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) without RSS was included for comparison. RESULTS: Of 53 patients with M6-C CTDR, 19 (35.9%) required RSS due to osteolysis. Osteolysis grades included Grade 1 (4 patients), Grade 2 (7 patients), Grade 3 (3 patients), and Grade 4 (5 patients). Revision strategies included removal and anterior fusion, requiring vertebrectomy for Grade 4 cases; revisions to a different CTDR prosthesis were reserved for Grades 1-3. The RSS group showed significant VAS neck pain improvement at T3 (mean = 36.2 points, p < 0.001), exceeding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). However, VAS arm pain and NDI did not meet MCID thresholds. The control group showed clinically significant improvements across all PROMs. At T2, the RSS group had a higher disability (NDI, p = 0.027) than the controls. CONCLUSION: Revision surgery for M6-C osteolysis improves neck pain, not arm pain or disability. Early detection and tailored revision strategies are crucial to optimize patient outcomes and mitigate osteolysis-related disability.

摘要

目的:M6-C™人工颈椎间盘(美国德克萨斯州刘易斯维尔市的Orthofix公司生产)引起的假体周围骨溶解已成为一个重要问题,有时需要进行翻修脊柱手术(RSS)。本研究评估患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)以及处理与器械相关的磨损和骨溶解的翻修策略。 方法:在索引手术前(T1)、翻修脊柱手术前(T2)和最终随访时(T3)分析PROMs,包括颈部/手臂疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)和颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)。通过影像学对骨溶解严重程度进行分级。纳入一组未进行RSS的初次M6-C颈椎全椎间盘置换术(CTDR)患者作为对照组进行比较。 结果:在53例行M6-C CTDR的患者中,19例(35.9%)因骨溶解需要进行RSS。骨溶解分级包括1级(4例患者)、2级(7例患者)、3级(3例患者)和4级(5例患者)。翻修策略包括取出并前路融合,4级病例需要进行椎体切除;1-3级病例则翻修为不同的CTDR假体。RSS组在T3时VAS颈部疼痛有显著改善(平均=36.2分,p<0.001),超过了最小临床重要差异(MCID)。然而,VAS手臂疼痛和NDI未达到MCID阈值。对照组在所有PROMs方面均有临床显著改善。在T2时,RSS组的功能障碍(NDI,p=0.027)高于对照组。 结论:M6-C骨溶解的翻修手术可改善颈部疼痛,但不能改善手臂疼痛或功能障碍。早期检测和定制的翻修策略对于优化患者预后和减轻骨溶解相关的功能障碍至关重要。

相似文献

[1]
Patient outcomes and surgical strategies in revision cervical arthroplasty following M6-C™ disc-related osteolysis.

Eur Spine J. 2025-5-28

[2]
Midterm osteolysis-induced aseptic failure of the M6-C™ cervical total disc replacement secondary to polyethylene wear debris.

Eur Spine J. 2022-5

[3]
Heterotopic ossification, osteolysis and implant failure following cervical total disc replacement with the M6-C™ artificial disc.

Eur Spine J. 2024-3

[4]
Surgical Hip Dislocation in the Era of Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrates High Survivorship and Improvements in Patient-reported Outcomes for Complex Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024-9-1

[5]
Effect of device constraint: a comparative network meta-analysis of ACDF and cervical disc arthroplasty.

Spine J. 2024-10

[6]
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024-12-1

[7]
Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-9-12

[8]
Do the Revision Rates of Arthroplasty Surgeons Correlate With Postoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024-1-1

[9]
Influence of Preoperative Physical Function Scores on Outcomes After Single-level Cervical Disc Replacement.

Clin Spine Surg. 2025-8-1

[10]
The lexicon for periprosthetic bone loss versus osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Eur Spine J. 2022-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025-2-15

[2]
Exploring patient ideas, concerns, and expectations in surgeon-patient consultations.

Patient Educ Couns. 2024-8

[3]
Heterotopic ossification, osteolysis and implant failure following cervical total disc replacement with the M6-C™ artificial disc.

Eur Spine J. 2024-3

[4]
Trends in use, outcomes, and revision procedures of anterior cervical disc replacement in the United States: a premiere database analysis from 2006-2019.

Eur Spine J. 2023-2

[5]
Single-Level Total Disc Replacement: Index-Level and Adjacent-Level Revision Surgery Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes.

Int J Spine Surg. 2022-7-25

[6]
Fulfillment of Patient Expectations After Spine Surgery is Critical to Patient Satisfaction: A Cohort Study of Spine Surgery Patients.

Neurosurgery. 2022-7-1

[7]
Midterm osteolysis-induced aseptic failure of the M6-C™ cervical total disc replacement secondary to polyethylene wear debris.

Eur Spine J. 2022-5

[8]
Statistical significance or clinical significance? A researcher's dilemma for appropriate interpretation of research results.

Saudi J Anaesth. 2021

[9]
Revision Surgeries at the Index Level After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty - A Systematic Review.

Neurospine. 2021-3

[10]
Revision Surgery for a Failed Artificial Disc.

Yonsei Med J. 2021-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索