• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎间盘置换术后索引节段的翻修手术——一项系统评价

Revision Surgeries at the Index Level After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty - A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Joaquim Andrei Fernandes, Lee Nathan J, Riew K Daniel

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Neurospine. 2021 Mar;18(1):34-44. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040454.227. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

DOI:10.14245/ns.2040454.227
PMID:33819934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8021828/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic literature review on revision surgeries at the index level after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) failure.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Prospective studies on patients who required a secondary surgery after CDA failure were included for analysis. The minimum follow-up for these studies was 5 years.

RESULTS

Out of 864 studies in the original search group, a total of 20 studies were included. From a total of 4,087 patients, 161 patients required a reoperation at the index level. A total of 170 surgeries were performed, as some patients required multiple surgeries. The most common secondary procedures were anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) (68%, N = 61) and posterior cervical fusion (15.5%, N = 14), followed by other reoperation (13.3%, N = 12). The associated outcomes for those who required a revision surgery were rarely mentioned in the included literature.

CONCLUSION

The long-term revision rate at the index level of failed CDA surgery was 3.9%, with a minimum 5-year follow-up. ACDF was the most commonly performed procedure to salvage a failed CDA. Some patients who required a new surgery after CDA failure may require a more extensive salvage procedure and even subsequent surgeries.

摘要

目的

对颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)失败后在初次手术节段进行翻修手术进行系统的文献综述。

方法

根据PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南进行系统的文献综述。纳入对CDA失败后需要二次手术的患者的前瞻性研究进行分析。这些研究的最短随访时间为5年。

结果

在最初检索组的864项研究中,共纳入20项研究。在总共4087例患者中,161例患者需要在初次手术节段再次手术。共进行了170次手术,因为一些患者需要多次手术。最常见的二次手术是颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)(68%,N = 61)和颈椎后路融合术(15.5%,N = 14),其次是其他再次手术(13.3%,N = 12)。纳入文献中很少提及需要翻修手术患者的相关结局。

结论

CDA手术失败后在初次手术节段的长期翻修率为3.9%,最短随访5年。ACDF是挽救失败的CDA最常用的手术方法。一些CDA失败后需要再次手术的患者可能需要更广泛的挽救手术甚至后续手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8289/8021828/2505b2d66654/ns-2040454-227f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8289/8021828/2505b2d66654/ns-2040454-227f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8289/8021828/2505b2d66654/ns-2040454-227f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Revision Surgeries at the Index Level After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty - A Systematic Review.颈椎间盘置换术后索引节段的翻修手术——一项系统评价
Neurospine. 2021 Mar;18(1):34-44. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040454.227. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
2
Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty-Long-Term Evidence Update.两级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术——长期证据更新
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S36-S40. doi: 10.14444/7089.
3
Trends in resource utilization and rate of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion throughout the United States from 2006 to 2013.2006 年至 2013 年期间美国颈椎间盘置换术和前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的资源利用和比率趋势。
Spine J. 2018 Jun;18(6):1022-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.10.072. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
Long-term Results Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较颈椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的长期疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):16-30. doi: 10.1111/os.12585. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
5
Multilevel cervical arthroplasty: current evidence. A systematic review.多级颈椎关节成形术:当前证据。一项系统评价。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E4. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.FOCUS16354.
6
Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?颈椎间盘置换术对先天性颈椎管狭窄症有益吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
7
Long-Term Comparison of Health Care Utilization and Reoperation Rates in Patients Undergoing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease.颈椎退变性疾病行颈椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后患者的长期医疗利用率和再手术率比较。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:e855-e865. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
8
The safety and efficacy of hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多节段颈椎退行性疾病采用杂交手术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术或颈椎间盘置换术的安全性和有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Feb;162(2):289-303. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04129-3. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
9
The change of adjacent segment after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术相比相邻节段的变化:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2017 Oct;17(10):1549-1558. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
10
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)治疗两节段颈椎间盘退变疾病的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient outcomes and surgical strategies in revision cervical arthroplasty following M6-C™ disc-related osteolysis.M6-C™椎间盘相关骨质溶解后颈椎翻修置换术的患者预后及手术策略
Eur Spine J. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08926-6.
2
Reoperation Strategy for Failure of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty at Index and Adjacent Levels.初次手术节段及相邻节段颈椎间盘置换失败后的再次手术策略
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 17;14(6):2038. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062038.
3
Risk Factors for Reoperation Following Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty as Utilized in a Representative Sample of United States Clinical Practice: A Retrospective PearlDiver Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc degenerative diseases on the basis of more than 60 months of follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于超过 60 个月随访的颈椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗颈椎间盘退行性疾病的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Neurol. 2020 Apr 20;20(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01717-0.
2
Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of rates of adjacent-level surgery to 7-year follow-up.颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:对至7年随访时相邻节段手术率的荟萃分析
J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):217-232. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.12.09.
3
美国临床实践代表性样本中使用的单节段颈椎间盘置换术后再次手术的危险因素:一项回顾性PearlDiver研究
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):1186-1192. doi: 10.1177/21925682241230965. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
4
Safety and Feasibility of Intradiscal Administration of Matrilin-3-Primed Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Spheroids for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain: Phase 1 Clinical Trial.Matrilin-3 预激活脂肪间充质基质细胞球体经椎间盘内给药治疗慢性椎间盘源性下腰痛的安全性和可行性:1 期临床试验。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 27;24(23):16827. doi: 10.3390/ijms242316827.
5
Enhanced Intervertebral Disc Repair via Genetically Engineered Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Tetracycline Regulatory System.基于四环素调控系统的基因工程间充质干细胞增强椎间盘修复。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 7;24(22):16024. doi: 10.3390/ijms242216024.
6
Clinical Effectiveness of Artificial Disc Replacement in Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Patients With Cervical Myelopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.人工椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Neurospine. 2023 Sep;20(3):1047-1060. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346498.249. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
7
Combining Virtual Surgical Planning and Patient-Specific 3D-Printing as a Solution to Complex Spinal Revision Surgery.结合虚拟手术规划和个性化3D打印作为复杂脊柱翻修手术的解决方案。
J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 22;13(1):19. doi: 10.3390/jpm13010019.
8
Cervical Radiculopathy: Focus on Factors for Better Surgical Outcomes and Operative Techniques.颈神经根病:关注改善手术效果的因素及手术技术
Asian Spine J. 2022 Dec;16(6):995-1012. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0445. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
9
The Effect of Subsidence on Segmental and Global Lordosis at Long-term Follow-up After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后长期随访中沉降对节段性和整体脊柱前凸的影响。
Neurospine. 2022 Dec;19(4):927-934. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244750.375. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
10
Anterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Radiculopathy After Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Technique Description and Case Report.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后神经根病的前路颈椎椎间孔切开术:技术描述与病例报告
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):384-392. doi: 10.14444/8219.
Clinical and radiological evaluation of cervical disc arthroplasty with 5-year follow-up: a prospective study of 384 patients.
颈椎间盘置换术的临床和影像学评估:5 年随访的前瞻性研究:384 例患者。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Oct;28(10):2371-2379. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06069-z. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
4
Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial.两级颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:一项前瞻性、随机、研究性器械豁免临床试验的10年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jun 21;31(4):508-518. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.SPINE19157. Print 2019 Oct 1.
5
Evidence-based use of arthroplasty in cervical degenerative disc disease.基于循证医学的颈椎退变性疾病关节置换术的应用。
Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):767-775. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-04281-y. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
6
Ten-year Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement With the BRYAN Cervical Disc: Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.BRYAN 颈椎间盘置换术后 10 年的结果:前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 May 1;44(9):601-608. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002907.
7
Long-Term Clinical Experience with Selectively Constrained SECURE-C Cervical Artificial Disc for 1-Level Cervical Disc Disease: Results from Seven-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial.选择性受限型SECURE-C颈椎人工椎间盘治疗单节段颈椎间盘疾病的长期临床经验:一项前瞻性、随机、对照的研究性器械豁免临床试验七年随访结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Aug 15;12(3):377-387. doi: 10.14444/5044. eCollection 2018 Jun.
8
Long-term Evaluation of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with the Mobi-C© Cervical Disc: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial with Seven-Year Follow-up.使用Mobi-C©颈椎间盘进行颈椎间盘置换术的长期评估:一项为期七年随访的随机、前瞻性、多中心临床试验
Int J Spine Surg. 2017 Nov 28;11(4):31. doi: 10.14444/4031. eCollection 2017.
9
Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc.颈椎置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的前瞻性、随机多中心研究:金属对金属人工椎间盘的5年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):252-261. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE16824. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
10
Higher reoperation rate following cervical disc replacement in a retrospective, long-term comparative study of 715 patients.在一项对715例患者的回顾性长期对照研究中,颈椎间盘置换术后再次手术率较高。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2434-2440. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5218-0. Epub 2017 Jul 17.