Koo Jihye, Redler Gage, Semenenko Vladimir, Rosenberg Stephen A, Keit Emily, Andreozzi Jacqueline M
Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70130. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70130. Epub 2025 May 29.
The 6-second cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition of the Ethos HyperSight (Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Palo Alto, CA, USA) on-board imaging system offers benefits, but could be too fast to accurately capture an average target position in a free-breathing lung cancer patient. This study aimed to ascertain whether a 6-second acquisition is appropriate for regularly breathing patients with varying respiration periods. Additionally, breathing patterns that could lead to clinically impactful inaccuracies for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) shifts were investigated.
Nine regular (sinusoidal) breathing patterns with different respiration rates (8-20 breaths-per-minute) and amplitudes, along with five irregular breathing patterns including a gasp/cough scenario, were tested using a respiratory motion phantom with a 3 cm diameter spherical target. Once the phantom was aligned using the external chassis to remove any default shifts, the 6-second CBCTs with Acuros reconstruction were acquired. Rigid registrations were performed using the 4DCT simulation average/untagged reconstructed image as reference to align to target (simulating clinical lung IGRT setup). Sixty-second CBCTs were also tested to verify the average offsets with conventional practice. The IGRT shifts were compared to 5 mm, a PTV margin typically used for lung tumors.
Minimal (<1.0 mm) shifts were observed for all regular breathing patterns with both 6-second and 60-second CBCT acquisitions. For moderately irregular breathing patterns and the gasp/cough scenario, all shifts were less than 5 mm. Shifts larger than 5 mm were observed in highly irregular breathing patterns, with both 6-second (14%) and 60-second (24%) CBCT acquisitions. Statistical tests showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the sizes of shifts made with the two CBCT durations.
The 6-second CBCT can effectively and reliably localize a mobile target for regular and moderately-irregular breathers. Cautions should be used for highly irregular breathers, regardless of the duration of CBCT acquisition.
瓦里安医疗系统公司(美国加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托)的Ethos HyperSight机载成像系统进行的6秒锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)采集有诸多益处,但对于自由呼吸的肺癌患者而言可能太快,无法准确捕捉平均靶位置。本研究旨在确定6秒采集对于呼吸周期各异的规律呼吸患者是否合适。此外,还研究了可能导致影像引导放射治疗(IGRT)位移出现具有临床影响的误差的呼吸模式。
使用带有直径3厘米球形靶的呼吸运动体模,测试了9种具有不同呼吸频率(每分钟8 - 20次呼吸)和幅度的规律(正弦)呼吸模式,以及包括喘息/咳嗽情况在内的5种不规律呼吸模式。一旦使用外部机架对齐体模以消除任何默认位移,便采集采用Acuros重建的6秒CBCT。使用4DCT模拟平均/未标记重建图像作为参考进行刚性配准,以对准靶(模拟临床肺部IGRT设置)。还测试了60秒CBCT以验证与传统做法的平均偏移。将IGRT位移与5毫米进行比较,5毫米是肺部肿瘤通常使用的计划靶体积(PTV)边界。
在6秒和60秒CBCT采集中,所有规律呼吸模式均观察到最小(<1.0毫米)位移。对于中度不规律呼吸模式和喘息/咳嗽情况,所有位移均小于5毫米。在高度不规律呼吸模式中观察到大于5毫米的位移,6秒CBCT采集时出现此类位移的比例为14%,60秒CBCT采集时为24%。统计测试表明,两种CBCT时长产生的位移大小之间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。
6秒CBCT能够有效且可靠地为规律呼吸和中度不规律呼吸者定位移动靶。对于高度不规律呼吸者,无论CBCT采集时长如何,都应谨慎使用。