Baley Colton, Andersen Sam, Anderson Clark, Dalwadi Shraddha, Saenz Daniel L
Department of Radiation Oncology, Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70114. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70114. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
Four-dimensional cone-beam CT (4D CBCT) incorporates oversampling of 3D data to reconstruct multi-phase CBCT data sets representing distinct phases of the breathing cycle based on a diaphragmatic correlate of respiratory motion. Motion artifacts and blurring can be reduced relative to three-dimensional cone-beam (3D CBCT), allowing clinicians to better visualize motion of targets. To quantitatively understand the degree to which target visualization is improved by 4D CBCT, an edge visualization metric (EVM) has been developed to describe the change in voxel intensities at the edge of targets in 4D CBCT maximum intensity projection images relative to 3D CBCT images.
The EVM describes the median distance where voxel intensities drop from 80% to 20% of target voxel values. The EVM was evaluated in a phantom study with a CIRS dynamic thorax phantom and with eleven on-treatment lung SBRT patients.
In the phantom study, the EVM was improved for 4D CBCT relative to 3D CBCT for one-cm targets (2.43 ± 0.22 mm vs. 2.67 ± 0.31 mm, p = 0.04) and for 2-cm targets (2.60 ± 0.35 mm vs. 3.46 ± 1.03 mm, p = 0.02). In patients, the EVM was 3.59 ± 1.01 mm vs. 4.25 ± 1.24 mm (p < 0.05).
When evaluating an imaging acquisition's degree of motion blurring and ability to delineate target edges, EVM may provide a less biased way to evaluate edge detection in the presence of motion when compared to traditional methods.
四维锥形束CT(4D CBCT)通过对三维数据进行过采样,基于呼吸运动的膈肌相关性重建代表呼吸周期不同阶段的多期CBCT数据集。相对于三维锥形束CT(3D CBCT),运动伪影和模糊可以减少,从而使临床医生能够更好地观察靶区运动。为了定量了解4D CBCT在多大程度上改善了靶区可视化,已开发出一种边缘可视化指标(EVM),用于描述4D CBCT最大强度投影图像中靶区边缘体素强度相对于3D CBCT图像的变化。
EVM描述了体素强度从靶区体素值的80%下降到20%时的中位数距离。在一项使用CIRS动态胸部体模和11例正在接受治疗的肺部立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)患者的体模研究中对EVM进行了评估。
在体模研究中,对于1厘米的靶区,4D CBCT相对于3D CBCT的EVM有所改善(2.43±0.22毫米对2.67±0.31毫米,p = 0.04),对于两厘米的靶区也是如此(2.60±0.35毫米对3.46±1.03毫米,p = 0.02)。在患者中,EVM为3.59±1.01毫米对4.25±1.24毫米(p < 0.05)。
在评估成像采集的运动模糊程度和描绘靶区边缘的能力时,与传统方法相比,EVM可能提供一种在存在运动时评估边缘检测偏差较小的方法。