Reduction and outcome of posterior pilon fractures with intercalary fragments: a retrospective cohort study comparing the transfibular and posteromedial approaches.

BACKGROUND

The transfibular fracture region (TFFR) approach can be utilized for managing posterior pilon fractures associated with intercalary fragments. However, its long-term outcomes remain unreported. This study aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of the TFFR approach and the posteromedial approach for posterior pilon fractures (Klammer type 2/3, Danis-Weber type B) associated with displaced intercalary fragments over an average 8 year follow-up.

METHOD

From 2012 to 2018, a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation surgery via either the TFFR approach or the posteromedial approach for posterior pilon fracture associated with intercalary fragments were enrolled for this study. Clinical outcomes were evaluated over an average 8 year (range 5-12 years) follow-up. The surgical duration, number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, and postoperative complications were recorded. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) score at last follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients were included in the final analysis, including 43 in the TFFR group and 36 in the posteromedial group. No significant differences between the two groups were observed in the FAOS (p = 0.679) or its specific components for symptoms (p = 0.264), pain (p = 0.963), activities of daily living (ADL, p = 0.102), sports (p = 0.156), or quality of life (p = 0.859). There was also no significant difference between the two groups in the FAAM-ADL (p = 0.408), FAAM-Sport (p = 0.617), and SF-36 scores (p = 0.757). Nevertheless, the surgical duration was shorter in the TFFR group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The TFFR approach is not inferior to the posteromedial approach. For posterior pilon fractures with lateral malleolar fractures in the same plane, the TFFR approach may be preferred owing to its potential to reduce surgical time and the use of a single incision. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.