Cigarán-Mendez Margarita, Pacho-Hernández Juan C, Tejera-Alonso Angela, Valera-Calero Juan A, Fernández-Palacios Francisco G, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas César
Department of Psychology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.
Department of Psychology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain; Escuela Internacional de Doctorado, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.
Pediatr Neurol. 2025 Aug;169:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2025.05.004. Epub 2025 May 9.
The aim of this study was to determine the ability of pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and muscle tenderness to differentiate children with and without tension-type headache (TTH).
A diagnostic accuracy study was conducted. PPTs (kPa) over the temporalis muscle, upper trapezius muscle, second metacarpal, and tibialis anterior muscle were bilaterally evaluated in 70 children with TTH and 70 age- and sex-matched healthy children. The total tenderness score (TTS) was also calculated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the optimal cutoff point, sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative likelihood ratios for each variable were calculated to determine the diagnostic accuracy.
Overall, children with TTH exhibited lower PPTs in all assessed points and higher TTS than children without TTH. Just tenderness showed an ROC score ≥ 0.7. Thus the ROC value (0.997) of muscle tenderness was indicative of good discriminatory power. Tenderness showed high sensitivity (97.1%) meaning that it accurately identified children with TTH, although its specificity was extremely low (2.9%), suggesting it could include children without TTH.
Although children with TTH exhibit pressure-pain hyperalgesia and muscle tenderness compared with healthy children, only muscle tenderness exhibited diagnostic accuracy to discriminate children with and without TTH. Further studies are now needed to clarify the clinical relevance of these findings.
本研究的目的是确定压力痛阈值(PPTs)和肌肉压痛鉴别紧张型头痛(TTH)患儿与非TTH患儿的能力。
开展一项诊断准确性研究。对70例TTH患儿和70例年龄及性别匹配的健康儿童双侧评估颞肌、上斜方肌、第二掌骨和胫骨前肌上的PPTs(kPa)。还计算了总压痛评分(TTS)。计算每个变量的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积、最佳截断点、敏感性、特异性以及阳性/阴性似然比,以确定诊断准确性。
总体而言,与非TTH患儿相比,TTH患儿在所有评估点的PPTs更低,TTS更高。仅压痛的ROC评分≥0.7。因此,肌肉压痛的ROC值(0.997)表明其具有良好的鉴别能力。压痛显示出高敏感性(97.1%),这意味着它能准确识别TTH患儿,尽管其特异性极低(2.9%),提示可能将非TTH患儿纳入其中。
尽管与健康儿童相比,TTH患儿存在压力性疼痛过敏和肌肉压痛,但只有肌肉压痛在鉴别TTH患儿与非TTH患儿方面具有诊断准确性。现在需要进一步研究来阐明这些发现的临床意义。