• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估低剂量氯吡格雷对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。

Assessing the efficacy and safety of low dose clopidogrel in Chinese ACS patients undergoing PCI: A retrospective study.

作者信息

Cheng Biao, Kong Xianghai, Chen Jian, He Qin, Zhou Mi, Deng Aiping

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Key Laboratory for Molecular Diagnosis of Hubei Province, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 30;104(22):e42551. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042551.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000042551
PMID:40441245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12129503/
Abstract

Continuation of single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) is recommended for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). However, the optimal long-term SAPT remains unclear for these patients. The retrospective study recruited ACS patients who underwent PCI and chosen clopidogrel to SAPT after DAPT between 01/2014 and 12/2016 at the Central Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, China. Patients were divided into 2 groups after standard DAPT: low dose group (clopidogrel, 50 mg/d) and control group (clopidogrel, 75 mg/d). Among 378 enrolled patients with ACS undergoing PCI, 49/378 (14.5%) were taking 50 mg clopidogrel after DAPT. At the mean follow-up of 34 months, the cumulative incidence of the primary outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.345, 95% CI: 0.455-3.974; P = .592), secondary outcome (HR 1.483, 95% CI: 0.506-4.348; P = .473), and safety outcomes (HR 2.268, 95% CI: 0.835-6.160; P = .108) showed no significant differences between the 2 group. Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed these findings. A 50 mg maintenance dose of clopidogrel may be comparable to 75 mg clopidogrel for Chinese patients with ACS undergoing PCI after at least 12 months of DAPT in efficacy and safety.

摘要

对于接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)后行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者,推荐继续进行单药抗血小板治疗(SAPT)。然而,这些患者的最佳长期SAPT方案仍不明确。这项回顾性研究纳入了2014年1月至2016年12月在中国武汉中心医院接受PCI且在DAPT后选择氯吡格雷进行SAPT的ACS患者。在标准DAPT后,患者被分为两组:低剂量组(氯吡格雷,50mg/d)和对照组(氯吡格雷,75mg/d)。在378例接受PCI的入选ACS患者中,49/378(14.5%)在DAPT后服用50mg氯吡格雷。在平均34个月的随访中,主要结局(风险比[HR]1.345,95%可信区间:0.455 - 3.974;P = 0.592)、次要结局(HR 1.483,95%可信区间:0.506 - 4.348;P = 0.473)和安全性结局(HR 2.268,95%可信区间:0.835 - 6.160;P = 0.108)在两组之间均无显著差异。倾向评分匹配分析证实了这些结果。对于接受至少12个月DAPT后行PCI的中国ACS患者,氯吡格雷50mg维持剂量在疗效和安全性方面可能与75mg氯吡格雷相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb88/12129503/e2d243dc0540/medi-104-e42551-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb88/12129503/8e71c29f820e/medi-104-e42551-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb88/12129503/aa1628f4edd8/medi-104-e42551-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb88/12129503/25772a9de158/medi-104-e42551-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb88/12129503/e2d243dc0540/medi-104-e42551-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb88/12129503/8e71c29f820e/medi-104-e42551-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb88/12129503/aa1628f4edd8/medi-104-e42551-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb88/12129503/25772a9de158/medi-104-e42551-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb88/12129503/e2d243dc0540/medi-104-e42551-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the efficacy and safety of low dose clopidogrel in Chinese ACS patients undergoing PCI: A retrospective study.评估低剂量氯吡格雷对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 30;104(22):e42551. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042551.
2
Impact of reduced-dose prasugrel vs. standard-dose clopidogrel on in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in 62 737 patients with acute coronary syndromes: a nationwide registry study in Japan.在 62737 例急性冠脉综合征患者中,与标准剂量氯吡格雷相比,使用低剂量普拉格雷对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗住院结局的影响:一项日本全国注册研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020 Jul 1;6(4):231-238. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz056.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in East Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于东亚行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Cardiology. 2023;148(4):363-373. doi: 10.1159/000530602. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
4
Efficacy assessment of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention by data mining and machine-learning decision tree approaches.通过数据挖掘和机器学习决策树方法评估替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Oct;45(5):1076-1086. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13172. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
5
In-Hospital Outcomes of Dual Loading Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients 75 Years and Older With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings From the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome) Project.75 岁及以上急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者双联抗血小板治疗的住院结局:来自 CCC-ACS(改善中国心血管疾病治疗-急性冠状动脉综合征)项目的研究结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 30;7(7):e008100. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008100.
6
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
7
Comparison of Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1 to 2 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The STOPDAPT-2 ACS Randomized Clinical Trial.急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗 1 至 2 个月后氯吡格雷单药治疗与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗的比较:STOPDAPT-2 ACS 随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Apr 1;7(4):407-417. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.5244.
8
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
9
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Guided by CYP2C19 Polymorphisms after Implantation of Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents for Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome.第二代药物洗脱支架植入后基于CYP2C19基因多态性指导的双联抗血小板治疗用于急性冠状动脉综合征的管理
Int Heart J. 2018 Jan 27;59(1):21-26. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17-005. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
10
Ischemic and Bleeding Events Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Associated With Low-Dose Prasugrel vs Standard-Dose Clopidogrel Treatment.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中与低剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗相关的缺血和出血事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2004.

本文引用的文献

1
Ischemic and Bleeding Events Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Associated With Low-Dose Prasugrel vs Standard-Dose Clopidogrel Treatment.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中与低剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗相关的缺血和出血事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2004.
2
Efficacy and safety of standard and low dose ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in east AsianPatients with chronic total occlusion undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a single center retrospective study.标准剂量和低剂量替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在东亚经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性完全闭塞病变患者中的疗效和安全性:一项单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Mar 5;20(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-01307-0.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term and Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Comparison between Asians and Non-Asians.
长期与短期双重抗血小板治疗的疗效与安全性:亚洲人与非亚洲人比较的荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 28;9(3):652. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030652.
4
A Genotype-Guided Strategy for Oral P2Y Inhibitors in Primary PCI.一种基于基因型的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中口服 P2Y12 抑制剂的策略。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1621-1631. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907096. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
5
The comparison of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus well-managed warfarin with a lower INR target of 1.5 to 2.5 in Asians patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.亚洲非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中,新型口服抗凝剂与 INR 目标值为 1.5 至 2.5 的华法林良好管理的疗效比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 18;14(3):e0213517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213517. eCollection 2019.
6
Randomized Comparisons of Double-Dose Clopidogrel or Adjunctive Cilostazol Versus Standard Dual Antiplatelet in Patients With High Posttreatment Platelet Reactivity: Results of the CREATIVE Trial.随机比较高治疗后血小板反应性患者中双剂量氯吡格雷或辅助西洛他唑与标准双联抗血小板治疗:CREATIVE 试验结果。
Circulation. 2018 May 22;137(21):2231-2245. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030190. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
7
[2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS.].[2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗重点更新版。]
Kardiol Pol. 2017;75(12):1217-1299. doi: 10.5603/KP.2017.0224.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Over Time in Patients With Prior MI in PEGASUS-TIMI 54.替格瑞洛在既往心肌梗死患者中的疗效和安全性:PEGASUS-TIMI 54 研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Sep 12;70(11):1368-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.768.
9
2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2016美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠心病患者双联抗血小板治疗疗程的重点更新指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Nov;152(5):1243-1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.044.
10
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).2014年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)心肌血运重建特别工作组编写,欧洲经皮心血管介入协会(EAPCI)提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29.