Mao Ting, Yorke Janelle, Shi Yan, Shen Nanping, Wang Haixia, Wong Frances-Kam-Yuet, Lam Katherine Ka Wai, Tang Lai Ngo, Liu Qi, Abu-Odah Hammoda, Belay Getaneh Mulualem, Yang Funa, Wang Li, Cheng Frankie Wai Tsoi, Zhang Xiaoju, Ho Ka Yan
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong SAR , China.
JC STEM Lab of Digital Oncology Care Enhancement (DOCE), The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 29;33(6):514. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09515-5.
To update the systematic review of assessment tools on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) for pediatric oncology patients based on the evidence available after the published review in 2020.
Seven English-language databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched for studies published from Nov 9, 2018, to May 20, 2024.
Studies that contained subjects who had a cancer diagnosis and were aged under 18 years and discussed the development of a tool to measure CIPN or assessed all test items and response categories for CIPN were included.
Data were screened and extracted independently using predesigned tables. The quality of each study was assessed based on Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools for analytical cross-sectional studies and case control studies. The quality of identified instruments for CIPN was evaluated by the modified version of Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool.
A total of 5 studies (with 633 patients) were included in the systematic review. Only one study was rated as high quality. We newly identified two patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), one objective assessment and a pain scale, and three new studies about the previous identified CIPN assessment measures.
Based on the current evidence, the pediatric-modified Total Neuropathy Score (ped-mTNS) and the Total Neuropathy Score-Pediatric Vincristine (TNS-PV) are still the two most appropriate tools for healthcare professionals to use in clinical settings. Our results also addressed the gap in existing literature by showing two newly PROMs for CIPN in pediatric oncology patients with acceptable quality. The combination of physician-based assessment tools and PROMs are recommended to evaluate the patients' CIPN-related symptoms.
基于2020年发表的综述之后可得的证据,更新针对儿科肿瘤患者化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)评估工具的系统综述。
检索了7个英文数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、Scopus和Web of Science),以查找2018年11月9日至2024年5月20日发表的研究。
纳入的研究需包含癌症诊断且年龄在18岁以下的受试者,并讨论了用于测量CIPN的工具的开发,或评估了CIPN的所有测试项目和反应类别。
使用预先设计的表格独立筛选和提取数据。根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所针对分析性横断面研究和病例对照研究的批判性评价工具评估每项研究的质量。通过诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS)工具的修改版评估已识别的CIPN工具的质量。
该系统综述共纳入5项研究(633例患者)。只有1项研究被评为高质量。我们新识别出两项患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)、一项客观评估和一个疼痛量表,以及三项关于先前已识别的CIPN评估指标的新研究。
基于当前证据,儿科改良总神经病变评分(ped-mTNS)和总神经病变评分 - 儿科长春新碱(TNS-PV)仍然是医疗保健专业人员在临床环境中使用的两个最合适的工具。我们的结果还通过展示两项质量可接受的、针对儿科肿瘤患者CIPN的新PROMs,填补了现有文献中的空白。建议结合基于医生的评估工具和PROMs来评估患者与CIPN相关的症状。