Dobrowolska Beata, Chiapinotto Stefania, Cabrera Esther, Chloubová Ivana, Kane Ros, Kennedy Sara, Lovrić Robert, Stanisavljević Sanja, Riklikiene Olga, Palese Alvisa
Department of Holistic Care and Management in Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 29;25(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07407-0.
The education of healthcare professionals, including nurses, represents a critical intersection with health systems science (HSS), which is often considered the third pillar of healthcare education alongside basic and clinical sciences. Despite the amount of research on nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic, there remains a gap in analysis from an HSS perspective.
A Comparative Education Approach involving undergraduate nursing programs (UNPs) across Europe, with longitudinal data collection from 2002 to 2023. The aim of the study was threefold: (a) to summarize the overall changes in UNPs during the COVID-19 pandemic; (b) to identify the changes retained in the post-pandemic era; and (c) to identify the impact of the pandemic on nursing education as perceived by nurse educators across nine European countries.
This study compares the changes in nursing education in European countries during and after the COVID-19 pandemic using a qualitative approach with data from nine universities. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on education provision. During the first wave, government restrictions forced a complete shift to online learning for theory classes, clinical training and laboratories. In subsequent waves, a hybrid format was chosen that combined online and face-to-face sessions. A major challenge was the placement of nursing students alongside general university students. This approach neglected their need for practical clinical training, which is crucial for their future careers. To compensate for the lack of clinical hours, various alternative teaching methods were introduced. Students were also offered the opportunity to volunteer in large-scale public health initiatives such as vaccination and testing campaigns, although bedside care for COVID-19 patients remained limited. The pandemic has also left its mark in the post-pandemic period. Some UNPs have retained elements of online education, notably lectures, research seminars, meetings, consultations and even online exams. Interestingly, an initial increase in applicant numbers was observed at six of the nine participating UNPs.
The COVID-19 pandemic has widened the gap between university-educated nurses and the clinical setting, i.e. between theory and practise, underlining the importance of HSS in nursing education. Rebuilding strong partnerships is crucial, but simply returning to the pre-pandemic model is not enough. To ensure uninterrupted education during future crises, proactive planning, including the creation of predefined protocols for collaboration, is essential. The pandemic underscores the need for closer alignment between the two sectors, which would better equip future nurses with the skills they need to thrive in the nursing workforce and ensure they are prepared for the challenges of the 21st century.
包括护士在内的医疗保健专业人员的教育,是与卫生系统科学(HSS)的一个关键交叉点,卫生系统科学通常被视为医疗保健教育的第三大支柱,与基础科学和临床科学并列。尽管在新冠疫情期间对护理教育进行了大量研究,但从卫生系统科学的角度进行分析仍存在差距。
采用比较教育方法,涉及欧洲各地的本科护理项目(UNP),收集2002年至2023年的纵向数据。该研究的目的有三个:(a)总结新冠疫情期间本科护理项目的总体变化;(b)确定疫情后保留的变化;(c)确定疫情对九个欧洲国家护士教育工作者所认为的护理教育的影响。
本研究采用定性方法,利用九所大学的数据,比较了欧洲国家在新冠疫情期间及之后护理教育的变化。新冠疫情对教育提供产生了重大影响。在第一波疫情期间,政府限制措施迫使理论课程、临床培训和实验室教学完全转向在线学习。在随后的几波疫情中,选择了一种混合模式,将在线课程和面对面课程相结合。一个主要挑战是护理专业学生与普通大学生一起上课。这种方式忽视了他们对实践临床培训的需求,而实践临床培训对他们未来的职业至关重要。为了弥补临床实习时间的不足,引入了各种替代教学方法。还为学生提供了在大规模公共卫生倡议中做志愿者的机会,如疫苗接种和检测活动,不过对新冠患者的床边护理仍然有限。疫情在疫情后时期也留下了印记。一些本科护理项目保留了在线教育的元素,特别是讲座、研究研讨会、会议、咨询甚至在线考试。有趣的是,在九个参与研究的本科护理项目中有六个观察到申请人数最初有所增加。
新冠疫情扩大了受过大学教育的护士与临床环境之间的差距,即理论与实践之间的差距,凸显了卫生系统科学在护理教育中的重要性。重建牢固的伙伴关系至关重要,但仅仅回到疫情前的模式是不够的。为确保未来危机期间教育的不间断进行,积极规划,包括制定预先确定的合作协议,至关重要。疫情凸显了两个部门之间更紧密协调的必要性,这将更好地使未来的护士具备在护理队伍中茁壮成长所需的技能,并确保他们为21世纪的挑战做好准备。