• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于比较两组的协方差分析模型:一篇强调统计分布理论的教程

The Ancova model for comparing two groups: a tutorial emphasizing statistical distribution theory.

作者信息

Schwarz Wolf

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 May 15;16:1600764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1600764. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1600764
PMID:40443728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12119598/
Abstract

The analysis of covariance (Ancova) is a widely used statistical technique for the comparison of groups with respect to a quantitative dependent variable in such a way that the comparison takes into account concomitant differences in a quantitative covariate. Despite its widespread use, some of the main features of this technique have remained elusive, contentious, or misconceived in applied settings. For example, some authors claim that the validity of an Ancova depends on the assumption that the expected value of the covariate is the same for all participants, or that the adjusted mean difference evaluated in an Ancova has a useful interpretation as the difference between the mean change scores of each group, whereas these claims are disputed by other authors. I suggest that these issues are best addressed and settled in the context of the underlying exact sampling distribution theory since significance statements, effect size estimates, and statistical power all derive directly from the statistical sampling distribution theory implied by the Ancova model. The distributional approach also clarifies the central distinction between conditional and marginal means, and the way in which various study designs (controlled, randomized, observational) affect and modify conclusions derived from an Ancova. The tutorial provides an explicit distributional account of the standard Ancova model to compare two independent groups; it clarifies the assumptions underlying the Ancova model, the nature and limitations of the conclusions it provides, and corrects some common misconceptions associated with its applications.

摘要

协方差分析(Ancova)是一种广泛使用的统计技术,用于比较各群体在定量因变量方面的差异,这种比较会考虑到定量协变量中的伴随差异。尽管它被广泛使用,但在应用场景中,该技术的一些主要特征仍然难以捉摸、存在争议或被误解。例如,一些作者声称,协方差分析的有效性取决于协变量的期望值对所有参与者都相同这一假设,或者协方差分析中评估的调整后平均差异作为每组平均变化分数之间的差异具有有用的解释,而其他作者对这些说法提出了质疑。我认为,这些问题最好在基础精确抽样分布理论的背景下加以解决和定论,因为显著性声明、效应大小估计和统计功效都直接源自协方差分析模型所隐含的统计抽样分布理论。分布方法还阐明了条件均值和边际均值之间的核心区别,以及各种研究设计(对照、随机、观察性)影响和修改从协方差分析得出的结论的方式。本教程对用于比较两个独立组的标准协方差分析模型进行了明确的分布阐述;它阐明了协方差分析模型的基础假设、它所提供结论的性质和局限性,并纠正了一些与其应用相关的常见误解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aaa/12119598/5ec029d17a94/fpsyg-16-1600764-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aaa/12119598/0aeda572e1fb/fpsyg-16-1600764-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aaa/12119598/a15bb21ae32e/fpsyg-16-1600764-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aaa/12119598/b4514673bcfe/fpsyg-16-1600764-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aaa/12119598/5ec029d17a94/fpsyg-16-1600764-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aaa/12119598/0aeda572e1fb/fpsyg-16-1600764-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aaa/12119598/a15bb21ae32e/fpsyg-16-1600764-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aaa/12119598/b4514673bcfe/fpsyg-16-1600764-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aaa/12119598/5ec029d17a94/fpsyg-16-1600764-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Ancova model for comparing two groups: a tutorial emphasizing statistical distribution theory.用于比较两组的协方差分析模型:一篇强调统计分布理论的教程
Front Psychol. 2025 May 15;16:1600764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1600764. eCollection 2025.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
How to construct analysis of covariance in clinical trials: ANCOVA with one covariate in a completely randomized design structure.如何在临床试验中构建协方差分析:完全随机设计结构中含一个协变量的协方差分析。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2025 Aug;78(4):315-320. doi: 10.4097/kja.24820. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
4
A cautionary note on the use of the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in classification designs with and without within-subject factors.关于在有和没有被试内因素的分类设计中使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)的警示说明。
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 21;6:474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00474. eCollection 2015.
5
Analyzing pre-post randomized studies with one post-randomization score using repeated measures and ANCOVA models.采用重复测量和协方差分析模型分析一个后随机化评分的前后随机化研究。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Oct-Nov;28(10-11):2952-2974. doi: 10.1177/0962280218789972. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
6
Qualitative Study定性研究
7
Common Misconceptions Concerning The Analysis Of Covariance.关于协方差分析的常见误解。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1977 Apr 1;12(2):171-86. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1202_5.
8
Analyzing pre-post designs using the analysis of covariance models with and without the interaction term in a heterogeneous study population.在异质研究人群中,使用包含和不包含交互项的协方差分析模型分析前后设计。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):189-204. doi: 10.1177/0962280219827971. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
9
Analysis of covariance in parallel-group clinical trials with pretreatment baselines.具有治疗前基线的平行组临床试验中的协方差分析。
Biometrics. 1987 Dec;43(4):895-901.
10
Empirical comparison of four baseline covariate adjustment methods in analysis of continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials.在随机对照试验中分析连续结局时,四种基线协变量调整方法的实证比较。
Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul 14;6:227-35. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S56554. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Regression away from the mean: Theory and examples.
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2018 Feb;71(1):186-203. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12106. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
2
Power and Sample Size Calculations for Contrast Analysis in ANCOVA.协方差分析中对比分析的功效与样本量计算
Multivariate Behav Res. 2017 Jan-Feb;52(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1219841. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
3
A cautionary note on the use of the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in classification designs with and without within-subject factors.关于在有和没有被试内因素的分类设计中使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)的警示说明。
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 21;6:474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00474. eCollection 2015.
4
Glass shape influences consumption rate for alcoholic beverages.玻璃形状影响酒精饮料的饮用速度。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043007. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
5
Change from baseline and analysis of covariance revisited.重新审视基线变化与协方差分析。
Stat Med. 2006 Dec 30;25(24):4334-44. doi: 10.1002/sim.2682.
6
ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected].协方差分析与基线变化:随机研究中效能更高,非随机研究中偏差更大[已修正]
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;59(9):920-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.007. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
7
Statistics notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements.统计学笔记:分析具有基线和随访测量的对照试验。
BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1123-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123.
8
Misunderstanding analysis of covariance.协方差的误解分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Feb;110(1):40-8. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.110.1.40.
9
A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons.群体比较解释中的一个悖论。
Psychol Bull. 1967 Nov;68(5):304-5. doi: 10.1037/h0025105.
10
Use of analysis of covariance in clinical trials: a clarification.
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Dec;7(4):325-9. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90039-5.