Siedlecki Karen L, Falzarano Francesca B
Department of Psychology, Fordham University, United States.
Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, United States.
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2024 Mar;13(1):26-29. doi: 10.1037/mac0000165.
Variations in visual perspective in autobiographical memory recall exemplify memory as a malleable and dynamic construct. Research examining variations in vantage point during autobiographical memory retrieval has identified a distinction between first-person (recalling a memory through one's own eyes) and third-person (recalling a memory as an observer) perspectives. In her target article, St. Jacques (2024) reviews the lack of consensus regarding whether memories retrieved from a third-person perspective are considered versus . In this commentary, we begin with a brief discussion highlighting the distinction between false and distorted memories. We then present findings derived from secondary data analyses examining the relationship between visual perspective and memory distortions on two different "false memory" measures in ( = 112) participants. Study findings underscore that recalling autobiographical memories with an observer perspective may be a distinct type of memory distortion.
自传体记忆回忆中视觉视角的变化体现了记忆是一种可塑且动态的结构。研究自传体记忆检索过程中视角变化的研究已经确定了第一人称(通过自己的眼睛回忆记忆)和第三人称(作为观察者回忆记忆)视角之间的区别。在她的目标文章中,圣雅克(2024年)回顾了关于从第三人称视角检索的记忆是否被视为[此处原文缺失相关内容]存在的共识缺失。在这篇评论中,我们首先进行简要讨论,突出虚假记忆和扭曲记忆之间的区别。然后我们展示从二次数据分析中得出的结果,该分析考察了112名参与者在两种不同“错误记忆”测量方法上视觉视角与记忆扭曲之间的关系。研究结果强调,从观察者视角回忆自传体记忆可能是一种独特的记忆扭曲类型。