• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Correlates and phenomenology of first and third person memories.第一人称和第三人称记忆的相关性和现象学。
Memory. 2010 Aug;18(6):625-37. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.497765. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
2
Visual imagery in autobiographical memory: The role of repeated retrieval in shifting perspective.自传体记忆中的视觉意象:重复检索在视角转换中的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 May;42:237-253. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
3
Shifting visual perspective during retrieval shapes autobiographical memories.在回忆过程中转换视觉视角会塑造自传体记忆。
Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:103-114. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.028. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
4
Autobiographical memory and psychological distress in a sample of upper-limb amputees.上肢截肢者样本中的自传体记忆与心理困扰
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e99803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099803. eCollection 2014.
5
Continuity of phenomenology and (in)consistency of content of meaningful autobiographical memories.有意义的自传体记忆的现象学连续性与内容的(不)一致性。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 May;42:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
6
Trait dissociation and the subjective affective, motivational, and phenomenological experience of self-defining memories.特质分离与自我定义记忆的主观情感、动机和现象学体验。
J Pers. 2011 Oct;79(5):939-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00708.x.
7
Vantage perspective during encoding: The effects on phenomenological memory characteristics.编码过程中的优势视角:对现象学记忆特征的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 May;42:142-149. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
8
Retrieval and phenomenology of autobiographical memories in blind individuals.盲人自传体记忆的检索和现象学。
Memory. 2015;23(3):329-39. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.886702. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
9
Manipulating the reported age in earliest memories in a Dutch community sample.操纵荷兰社区样本中最早记忆的报告年龄。
PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217436. eCollection 2019.
10
Closure of autobiographical memories: The effects of written recounting from first- or third-person visual perspective.自传体记忆的封闭:第一人称或第三人称视觉视角的书面叙述的影响。
Memory. 2010 Nov;18(8):900-17. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.524650.

引用本文的文献

1
Observer Perspective Memories May Be a Distinct Type of Memory Distortion.观察者视角记忆可能是一种独特的记忆扭曲类型。
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2024 Mar;13(1):26-29. doi: 10.1037/mac0000165.
2
Individuals who rarely adopt observer perspectives report richer scene-based autobiographical memories.很少采用观察者视角的个体报告称其具有更丰富的基于场景的自传体记忆。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 20;14(1):19310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70179-y.
3
The Subjective Experience of Autobiographical Remembering: Conceptual and Methodological Advances and Challenges.自传性记忆的主观体验:概念与方法的进展及挑战
J Intell. 2024 Feb 12;12(2):21. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12020021.
4
Examining the roles of visual imagery and working memory in the retrieval of autobiographical memories using a dual-task paradigm.使用双任务范式考察视觉意象和工作记忆在自传体记忆提取中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Mar;77(3):447-460. doi: 10.1177/17470218231200724. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
5
Do positive memory characteristics influence daily-level trajectories of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms? an exploratory daily diary study.积极记忆特征是否会影响创伤后应激障碍症状的日常水平轨迹?一项探索性的日常日记研究。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2023 May;36(3):320-338. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2022.2075856. Epub 2022 May 13.
6
Do questionnaires reflect their purported cognitive functions?问卷真能反映其声称的认知功能吗?
Cognition. 2020 Feb;195:104114. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104114. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
7
Guilt as a Motivator for Moral Judgment: An Autobiographical Memory Study.作为道德判断动机的内疚感:一项自传体记忆研究
Front Psychol. 2017 May 10;8:750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00750. eCollection 2017.
8
Time Frame Affects Vantage Point in Episodic and Semantic Autobiographical Memory: Evidence from Response Latencies.时间框架影响情景和语义自传体记忆中的有利视角:来自反应潜伏期的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 20;8:615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00615. eCollection 2017.
9
The Impact of Perspective Change As a Cognitive Reappraisal Strategy on Affect: A Systematic Review.视角转换作为一种认知重评策略对情感的影响:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 4;7:1715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01715. eCollection 2016.
10
Visual imagery in autobiographical memory: The role of repeated retrieval in shifting perspective.自传体记忆中的视觉意象:重复检索在视角转换中的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 May;42:237-253. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Distant memories: a prospective study of vantage point of trauma memories.遥远的记忆:一项关于创伤记忆视角的前瞻性研究
Psychol Sci. 2009 Sep;20(9):1049-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02393.x. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
2
Remembering as an observer: how is autobiographical memory retrieval vantage perspective linked to depression?作为观察者的记忆:自传体记忆检索的有利视角与抑郁是如何关联的?
Memory. 2009 Aug;17(6):624-34. doi: 10.1080/09658210902984526. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
3
Ostracism: how much it hurts depends on how you remember it.排斥:其伤害程度取决于你如何铭记它。
Emotion. 2009 Jun;9(3):430-4. doi: 10.1037/a0015350.
4
Genetics and personality affect visual perspective in autobiographical memory.遗传学和个性会影响自传体记忆中的视觉视角。
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Sep;18(3):823-30. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 May 6.
5
Looking at or through rose-tinted glasses? Imagery perspective and positive mood.戴着玫瑰色眼镜看?意象视角与积极情绪。
Emotion. 2008 Dec;8(6):875-9. doi: 10.1037/a0013617.
6
Asking 'why' from a distance facilitates emotional processing: a reanalysis of Wimalaweera and Moulds (2008).远距离追问“为什么”有助于情绪加工:对维马拉维拉和莫尔兹(2008年)研究的重新分析
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Jan;47(1):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.014. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
7
Asking 'why' still increases intrusions: a response to Ayduk and Kross (2008).追问“为什么”仍会增加闯入性思维:对艾杜克和克罗斯(2008年)的回应。
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Jan;47(1):93-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.10.012. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
8
When the "I" looks at the "Me": autobiographical memory, visual perspective, and the self.当“我”审视“自我”:自传体记忆、视觉视角与自我。
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Dec;17(4):1386-97. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
9
Manipulating recall vantage perspective of intrusive memories in dysphoria.操控烦躁不安中侵入性记忆的回忆优势视角。
Memory. 2008 Oct;16(7):742-50. doi: 10.1080/09658210802290453.
10
Processing memories of anger-eliciting events: the effect of asking 'why' from a distance.处理引发愤怒事件的记忆:远距离询问“为什么”的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Mar;46(3):402-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.12.006. Epub 2007 Dec 23.

第一人称和第三人称记忆的相关性和现象学。

Correlates and phenomenology of first and third person memories.

机构信息

NIH Biomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging-Intramural Research Program, 251 Bayview Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2010 Aug;18(6):625-37. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.497765. Epub 2010 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2010.497765
PMID:20665336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2933036/
Abstract

The present research addressed fundamental questions about the visual perspective of autobiographical memories: Are stable personality characteristics associated with visual perspective? Does visual perspective influence the memory's phenomenological qualities? Participants in Study 1 (N=1684) completed individual-difference measures and indicated the perspective from which they generally retrieve memories. Participants in Study 2 (N=706) retrieved a memory from their natural or manipulated perspective, rated its phenomenology, and completed the same individual-difference measures. Dissociation and anxiety were associated with third person retrieval style; the Big Five personality traits were primarily unrelated to perspective. Compared to third person memories, naturally occurring first person memories were higher on Vividness, Coherence, Accessibility, Sensory Detail, Emotional Intensity, and Time Perspective, and lower on Distancing; manipulating perspective eliminated these differences. Visual perspective is associated with clinically relevant constructs and, although associated with the memory's phenomenology, perspective does not shape it.

摘要

本研究探讨了自传体记忆的视觉视角的基本问题

稳定的个性特征是否与视觉视角相关?视觉视角是否会影响记忆的现象学质量?研究 1(N=1684)的参与者完成了个体差异测量,并指出他们通常从哪个视角检索记忆。研究 2(N=706)的参与者从自然或人为的视角检索记忆,对其现象学进行评分,并完成相同的个体差异测量。分离焦虑与第三人称检索风格相关;五大人格特质与视角主要无关。与第三人称记忆相比,自然出现的第一人称记忆在生动性、连贯性、可及性、感官细节、情绪强度和时间视角上更高,而在距离上更低;人为改变视角消除了这些差异。视觉视角与临床相关的结构有关,尽管与记忆的现象学有关,但视角不会塑造它。