Parry Luke, Morello Thiago F, Fraser James A, Guerrero Natalia, Lotta Gabriela S, Martins Rodrigo C, Newton Peter, Cardoso Jessica C Pires, Souza Santos Andreza A, Torres Mauricio
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Amazonian Institute of Family Agriculture, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Conserv Biol. 2025 Jun;39(3):e70031. doi: 10.1111/cobi.70031.
Demands for territorial recognition are foundational to the claiming of rights by forest-proximate people who attempt to conserve their forests. The rights of these often-marginalized populations have been largely overlooked by conservationists, yet they are central to achieving people-centered conservation. We further developed the concept of forest citizenship as a normative framework and analytical tool based on Brazilian social environmentalism (socioambientalismo), florestania (a former political project in Acre state), Latin American scholarship on ecological citizenship, and Eurocentric political philosophy. Decades of struggle for territorial recognition and social inclusion have solidified the right to have rights for Amazonia's forest citizens. Hence, forest citizens are people who have become so through the sociopolitical dynamics of their rights claims. Forest citizenship is built on community mobilization to create legally recognized territories with participatory governance but becomes tangible only if individuals and communities can successfully claim other rights from institutions through everyday practices of citizenship. We also assessed the current number and distribution of forest citizens across Brazilian Amazonia based on gridded population data and spatial analyses to calculate the resident population in four territorial categories that meet these democratic preconditions: Indigenous lands, extractive reserves, sustainable development reserves, ecological settlement projects, and Afro-descendent Quilombola territories. The territories covered 31% of the Legal Amazon, were home to 1.05 million forest citizens, and had diverse primary policy objectives but shared goals of empowering communities and conserving forests. To be emancipatory, forest citizenship must be bottom-up, socially inclusive, and improve people's lives. We suggest that conservationists pay greater attention to power relations and decision-making structures related to forest territories. Territory-based forest citizenship may be relevant for other countries where environmentalism has intersected with struggles for land rights and democracy.
对领土承认的要求是那些试图保护自己森林的森林周边居民争取权利的基础。这些常常被边缘化的人群的权利在很大程度上被自然资源保护主义者忽视了,然而他们对于实现以人为本的保护至关重要。我们基于巴西社会环境主义(社会环境论)、弗洛雷斯塔尼亚(阿克里州以前的一个政治项目)、拉丁美洲关于生态公民身份的学术研究以及欧洲中心主义政治哲学,进一步发展了森林公民身份的概念,将其作为一个规范性框架和分析工具。几十年来为领土承认和社会包容而进行的斗争巩固了亚马逊森林公民拥有权利的权利。因此,森林公民是那些通过其权利主张的社会政治动态而成为森林公民的人。森林公民身份建立在社区动员的基础上,以创建具有参与式治理的法律认可领土,但只有当个人和社区能够通过日常公民实践从机构成功争取到其他权利时,它才会变得切实可行。我们还根据网格化人口数据和空间分析评估了巴西亚马逊地区森林公民的当前数量和分布情况,以计算符合这些民主前提条件的四类领土中的常住人口:原住民土地、采掘保留地、可持续发展保留地、生态定居项目以及非裔后裔基隆波拉社区领土。这些领土覆盖了合法亚马逊地区的31%,是105万森林公民的家园,有着不同的主要政策目标,但都有增强社区权能和保护森林的共同目标。要具有解放性,森林公民身份必须是自下而上的、社会包容的,并改善人们的生活。我们建议自然资源保护主义者更多地关注与森林领土相关的权力关系和决策结构。基于领土的森林公民身份可能与其他国家相关,在这些国家,环境主义与争取土地权利和民主的斗争相互交织。