Kono M, Sei S
Jpn J Exp Med. 1977 Feb;47(1):1-7.
Serotyping of 168 clinical isolates by the slide agglutination test using TIBS (Toshiba Institute of Biological Science) serotyping sera, which were prepared from Homma's serotype strains at the request of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Serotype Committee in Japan, was performed and the results were compared with serotyping using IMSUT (Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo) serotyping sera by the tube agglutination test. When heat-killed antigen from clinical isolates were used, both sets of serotyping sera showed similar results and the slide agglutination test using TIBS serotyping sera could be substituted for the tube agglutination test using IMSUT sera. It was also discovered that serotyping by the slide agglutination test with TIBS serotyping sera could be carried out using live bacteria. However, in serotyping with live bacteria, there is some difficulty in observing the agglutination time. To solve this problem, we propose that positive agglutination should be determined within 60 sec. The authors also performed serotyping of the clinical isolates using Difco serotyping sera prepared by the Difco Company based on Liu's serotyping system, and the results were compared with those obtained with serotyping sera prepared with Homma's serotype strains. The results indicated that in serotyping of clinical isolates using Difco serotyping sera more cross reaction occurred than in serotyping with sera obtained from Homma's serotype strains.
使用由日本铜绿假单胞菌血清型委员会要求,基于本间血清型菌株制备的东芝生物科学研究所(TIBS)血清型分型血清,通过玻片凝集试验对168株临床分离株进行血清型分型,并将结果与使用东京大学医学科学研究所(IMSUT)血清型分型血清通过试管凝集试验进行的血清型分型结果进行比较。当使用临床分离株的热灭活抗原时,两组血清型分型血清显示出相似的结果,并且使用TIBS血清型分型血清的玻片凝集试验可以替代使用IMSUT血清的试管凝集试验。还发现使用TIBS血清型分型血清通过玻片凝集试验进行血清型分型可以使用活菌进行。然而,在使用活菌进行血清型分型时,观察凝集时间存在一些困难。为了解决这个问题,我们建议在60秒内确定阳性凝集。作者还使用Difco公司基于刘的血清型分型系统制备的Difco血清型分型血清对临床分离株进行血清型分型,并将结果与使用基于本间血清型菌株制备的血清型分型血清获得的结果进行比较。结果表明,在使用Difco血清型分型血清对临床分离株进行血清型分型时,比使用基于本间血清型菌株获得的血清进行血清型分型时发生更多的交叉反应。